Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/329,210

System and Method for Coordinating Resources in Multiplatform Environments Via Machine Learning

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 05, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, CHAU T
Art Unit
2145
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
372 granted / 549 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 549 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/05/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sohum et al. (Sohum), US Patent Application Publication No. US 2021/0117893 A1. As to independent claim 1, Sohum discloses a device for coordinating resources in multiplatform environments, the device (Figure 3, paragraphs [0047]: an interactive computing environment for switching and handover between the one or more intelligent conversational agents includes one or more communication device) comprising: a processor (paragraph [0012]: computing device includes one or more processor); a communications module coupled to the processor (Figures 3, 6, paragraphs [0047], [0121]: communication network is connected with the one or more communication devices (processor); and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory storing computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to (paragraph [0012]: the memory is coupled to the one or more processor and the memory stores instructions, which are executed by the one or more processor)): provide a first platform to receive a first query, the first query for determining one or more properties of a process of a second platform of an enterprise (paragraphs [0012] and [0056]: a user connects with the interactive computing environment through a communication device D1, i.e., a smartphone (a first platform) to access a mega bot M1 (intermediary platform), and the user sends a query for a mega bot at the chatbot switching system (second platform), wherein the query has a plurality of aspects (properties), which includes context, linguistic style, sentence construction (properties)); select a machine learning model from a plurality of machine learning models based on the first query, the selected machine learning model being associated with the second platform that interfaces with the process (paragraphs [0012] and [0064]: performing to enable selection of a suitable intelligent conversational agent (a machine learning model) from the one or more intelligent conversational agents, wherein the selection the suitable intelligent conversational agent from the one or more intelligent conversational agents having the trust score above the threshold level according to the plurality of aspect (properties) of the query); generate a second query, based on the first query, for the selected machine learning model (paragraph [0068]: the chatbot switching system (the second platform) creates a response (a second query) for the query at the mega bot using the suitable intelligent conversational agent from the one or more intelligent conversational agents); use the second query and the selected machine learning model to search the second platform to determine properties of the process and output one or more determined properties, the selected machine learning model having been trained based on queries from intermediary platforms (paragraphs [0060], [0068]: the mega bot (intermediary platform) provides response (second query) to the user, the mega bot respond to the one or more queries of the plurality of users based on selection and switching of the one or more intelligent conversational agents); and serve, via the first platform, the one or more determined properties as a response to the first query (paragraphs [0060], [0068], [0075]: the mega bot provides response to the user of the device; Also see paragraphs [0082]-[0085] for different queries, different responses according to the different queries, and different selection of chatbots (machine learning models) according to the different queries). As to dependent claim 2, Sohum discloses wherein the first query is provided by a user, and the intermediary platform is an automated platform for generating second queries from the user input first query (paragraphs [0075] and [0082]-[0085]). As to dependent claim 3, Sohum discloses wherein each of a first group of machine learning models of the plurality of machine learning modes are trained to determine properties of different platforms (paragraphs [0065]-[0066]). As to dependent claim 4, Sohum discloses wherein the second platform is an event handler that manages a plurality of processes for a plurality of platforms (paragraphs [0087], [0090]). As to dependent claim 5, Sohum discloses wherein the selected machine learning model is trained to identify properties from the plurality of processes maintained by an event handler (paragraph [0066]). As to dependent claim 6, Sohum discloses wherein the instructions cause the processor to retrain the selected machine learning model based on updating training data for the second platform (paragraph [0066]). As to dependent claim 7, Sohum discloses wherein the instructions cause the processor to: retrain another machine learning model of the plurality of machine learning models based on updating training data for another related platform (paragraph [0066]). As to dependent claim 8, Sohum discloses wherein the first platform comprises a telephonic channel or a computer-based channel for receiving input from customers or employees (paragraph [0056]). As to dependent claim 9, Sohum discloses wherein the computer-based channel is a chatbot (paragraph [0026]). As to dependent claim 10, Sohum discloses wherein the selected machine learning model is trained with reference data representing workflows of the second platform (Abstract). Claims 11-19 are method claims that contain similar limitations of claims 1-9, respectively. Therefore claims 11-19 are rejected under the same rationale. Claim 20 is a computer readable medium claim that contains similar limitations of claim 1. Therefore, claim 20 is rejected under the same rationale. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to CHAU T NGUYEN at telephone number (571)272-4092. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 8am to 5pm (PT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Cesar Paula, can be reached at telephone number 5712724128. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /CHAU T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2145
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596765
GENERATION AND USE OF CONTENT BRIEFS FOR NETWORK CONTENT AUTHORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591795
METHOD FOR PROVIDING EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585722
IMAGE GENERATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, METHODS OF OPERATING IMAGE GENERATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579356
MATHEMATICAL CALCULATIONS WITH NUMERICAL INDICATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12547825
WHITELISTING REDACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.8%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 549 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month