Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/329,853

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 06, 2023
Examiner
MIYOSHI, JESSE Y
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
268 granted / 476 resolved
-11.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 476 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of device embodiment 1 as shown in fig. 1,2 (claims 1, 2, 15 readable thereon, claims 3-14 withdrawn) in the reply filed on 12/15/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saikaku et al. (US PGPub 2012/0025874; hereinafter “Saikaku”) in view of Shiraishi (US PGPub 2014/0003109). Re claim 1: Saikaku teaches (e.g. fig. 41) a semiconductor device comprising: a semiconductor substrate (substrate of device 100; hereinafter “S”) including a drift layer (n- drift layer 102; e.g. paragraph 263) of a first conductive type (n-type) between a first principal surface (upper surface of device 100; hereinafter “1PS”) and a second principal surface (lower surface of device 100; hereinafter “2PS”) opposed to each other; an IGBT region (IGBT region above collector 141; hereinafter “IR”) and a diode region (diode region above anode 142; hereinafter “DR”) provided on the semiconductor substrate (S); and an emitter electrode (109) provided on the first principal surface (1PS) of the semiconductor substrate (S), a base layer (p-type body 103; e.g. paragraph 264) of a second conductive type (p-type) provided on the first principal surface (1PS) side of the drift layer (102), an emitter layer (n-type emitter 104; e.g. paragraph 263) of the first conductive type (n-type) and a contact layer (p-type contact layer 105; e.g. paragraph 234) of the second conductive type (p-type) provided on the first principal surface (1PS) side of the base layer (103), a plurality of active trenches (trench for gate 108a; hereinafter “AT”) penetrating through the base layer (103) and the emitter layer (104) from the first principal surface (1PS), a gate electrode (108a) provided inside the active trenches (AT) via a gate insulating film (107), and a collector layer (P+ collector 141; e.g. paragraph 263) of the second conductive type (p-type) provided on the second principal surface (2PS) side of the drift layer (102), wherein the diode region (DR) includes an anode layer (103a) of the second conductive type (p-type) provided on the first principal surface (1PS) side of the drift layer (102), a plurality of diode trenches (trench for diode gate 108b; hereinafter “DT”) provided from the first principal surface (1PS) to the anode layer (103a), a diode electrode (108b) provided inside the diode trenches (DT) via a diode insulating film (107 in DT), and a cathode layer (N+ cathode 142; e.g. paragraph 263) of the first conductive type (n-type) provided on the second principal surface (2PS) side of the drift layer (102), wherein a depth of the anode layer (103a) is deeper than a depth of the diode trenches (DT). Saikaku is silent as to explicitly teaching wherein the IGBT region includes a carrier accumulation layer of the first conductive type provided on the first principal surface side of the drift layer; an implanted electrode provided inside the active trenches via the gate insulating film and positioned on the second principal surface side of the gate electrode. Shiraishi teaches (e.g. fig. 7) the IGBT region (IGBT region shown in fig. 7; e.g. paragraph 53) includes a carrier accumulation layer (n-type layer 123; e.g. paragraph 53) of the first conductive type (n-type) provided on the first principal surface (upper side of drift region 104) side of the drift layer (drift layer 104; e.g. paragraph 53); an implanted electrode (embedded electrode 118 connected to the emitter electrode 114; e.g. paragraph 47) provided inside the active trenches (gate trench 117; e.g. paragraph 37) via the gate insulating film (109) and positioned on the second principal surface side (bottom side of gate 110) of the gate electrode (110). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, absent unexpected results, to use the carrier accumulation layer and embedded electrode as taught by Shiraishi in the device of Saikaku in order to have the predictable result of improving device performance by improving on-resistance. Claim(s) 2 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saikaku in view of Shiraishi as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Soneda et al. (US PGPub 2021/0091216; hereinafter “Soneda”). Re claim 2: Saikaku in view of Shiraishi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the implanted electrode (118 of Shiraishi) is insulated from the gate electrode (110 of Shiraishi) and is electrically connected to the emitter electrode (118 of Shiraishi is connected to the emitter 114; e.g. paragraph 47), Saikaku in view of Shiraishi is silent as to explicitly teaching the diode electrode is electrically connected to the emitter electrode. Soneda teaches (e.g. fig. 1) the diode electrode (diode trench electrode 13c; e.g. paragraph 36) is electrically connected to the emitter electrode (13c electrically connected to emitter electrode 9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, absent unexpected results, to use the connection method for the diode trench electrode as taught by Soneda in the device of Saikaku in view of Shiraishi in order to have the predictable result of using a connection method which improves device performance by accumulating carriers and improves switching speed. Re claim 15: Saikaku in view of Shiraishi and Soneda teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor substrate (1 of Soneda) is formed of a wide-bandgap semiconductor (Silicon Carbide used to improve breakdown voltage and current capacity; e.g. paragraph 69 of Soneda). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSE Y MIYOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1629. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSE Y MIYOSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598761
DIODE INCLUDING A TRENCH ELECTRODE SUBDIVIDED INTO AT LEAST FIRST AND SECOND PARTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577099
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563888
DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ENCAPSULATED QUANTUM DOT LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563713
Memory Device With Jogged Backside Metal Lines
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557573
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+19.2%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 476 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month