Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/338,498

DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 21, 2023
Priority
Jul 19, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0089190
Examiner
GREEN, TRACIE Y
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1119 granted / 1408 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1435
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.8%
+23.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1408 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/16/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Receipt is acknowledged of applicant' s amendment filed 04/16/2026. Claim 18 cancelled, Claims 1-17 and 19-20 are pending and an action on the merits is as follows. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection due to the applicants amendment. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim (US 20200013766 A1) in view of Jung et al. (US 20230217764 A1) (Jung, hereafter). Regarding claim 1, Kim discloses (1-17 and corresponding text) a display device (Figure 2) comprising: a display area (DA) and a non-display area(NDA); and a pixel (PXL) disposed on a substrate (SUB) in the display area (DA), (Figure 4-6 and π97-π98) wherein the pixel (PXL) includes: a first sub-pixel (SPX1)disposed in a first sub-pixel area SPA1), the first sub-pixel emitting light of a first color; a second sub-pixel (SPX2) disposed in a second sub-pixel area(SPA2), the second sub-pixel (SPX2) emitting light of a second color; and a third sub-pixel (SPX3)disposed in a third sub-pixel area(SPA3), the third sub-pixel emitting light of a third color, and each of two sub-pixels among the first sub-pixel(SPX1), the second sub-pixel (SPX2), and the third sub-pixel (SPX3) includes a light emitting element emitting light of the third color (B), and the other sub-pixel among the first sub-pixel, the second sub-pixel, and the third sub-pixel includes a light emitting element emitting light of a color different from the third color (red and green respectively) (π185). Kim fails to explicitly disclose wherein only one among the first sub-pixel, the second sub-pixel, and the third sub-pixel includes a color conversion layer and a color filter. Jung discloses (Figure 1, red pixel) the light emitting display device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure further includes a red filter( 109R) provided between the substrate (100) and the first anode (110a), a green filter (109G) provided between the substrate (100) and the second anode (110b), and a blue filter (109B) provided between the substrate (100) and the third anode (110c). Moreover, the light emitting display device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure further includes a color conversion layer (115) provided between the substrate (100) and the first anode (110a) (π28). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing dates to modify the display device of Kim as disclosed by Jung wherein only one among the first sub-pixel, the second sub-pixel, and the third sub-pixel includes a color conversion layer and a color filter the motivation being to reduce material cost and manufacturing processes. Regarding claim 2, Kim disclose wherein each of the first sub-pixel (SPX1) and the third sub-pixel (SPX3) includes a first light emitting element emitting light of the third color (third color being blue), and the second sub-pixel includes a second light emitting element emitting light of the second color (the second color being green). Regarding claim 3, Kim discloses wherein the first sub-pixel includes a first color conversion layer(CCL1) including at least one first color conversion particle(π161) and each of the second sub-pixel and the third sub-pixel includes a light scattering layer (LSL) including at least one light scattering particle(π202-π203). Regarding claim 4, Kim discloses (Figures 1-9) (Figure 7) wherein the first sub-pixel (SPX1) includes: a pixel circuit layer (PCL) disposed on the substrate (SUB), the pixel circuit layer including a transistor (π131); a display element layer (DPL) disposed on the pixel circuit layer (PCL), the display element layer (DPL) including the first light emitting element (LD1) disposed in a first emission area; a first color conversion layer(CCL1) disposed on the display element layer (DPL)to overlap the first emission area (no number) in a plan view, the first color conversion layer(CCL1) including at least one first color conversion particle (π161); and a color filter layer(CF1) disposed on the first color conversion layer (CCL1). Regarding claim 5, Kim discloses (Figures 1-10) (Figure 10) wherein the display element layer (DPL) further includes a bank (PW) provided in a first non-emission area(no label), the bank(PW) including an opening corresponding to the first emission area (no label). Regarding claim 6, Kim fails to explicitly disclose wherein the first sub-pixel further includes a dummy bank disposed on the bank, corresponding to the first non-emission area. Kim rather discloses on Partition Wall which extends upwards to the capping layer to adequately prevent light leakage in the device . One of ordinary skill in the art could readily derive before the effective filing date to modify the display device of Kim as taught by Kim wherein the first sub-pixel further includes a dummy bank disposed on the bank, corresponding to the first non-emission area the motivation being to prevent light mixing at unwanted boundaries. Regarding claim 7, Kim discloses (Figures 1-9) (Figure 7), wherein the first sub-pixel (SPX1) further includes a capping layer(CPL1) disposed between the first color conversion layer (CCL1) and the color filter (CF1). Regarding claim 8, Kim discloses (Figure 10) wherein the capping layer (CPL) is disposed directly on the first color conversion layer(CCL1) and the dummy bank (Partition Wall, PW) (see rejection claim 6). Regarding claim 9, Kim discloses (Figures 10-16) (Figure 10) wherein the second sub-pixel (SPX2) includes: a pixel circuit layer (PCL) disposed on the substrate (sub), the pixel circuit layer(PCL) including a transistor (T); a display element layer (DPL)disposed on the pixel circuit layer (PCL), the display element layer(DPL) including the second light emitting element (LD2) disposed in a second emission area; and a first light scattering layer(CCL2 and π203) disposed on the display element layer(DPL) to overlap the second emission area in a plan view, the first light scattering layer(CCL2 and π203) including at least one first light scattering particle (π203). Regarding claim 10, Kim discloses (Figures 10-16)( Figure 10) wherein the display element layer(DPL)) further includes a bank (PW, partition wall) provided in a second non-emission area, the bank (PW) including opening corresponding to the second emission area. Regarding claim 11, Kim fails to explicitly disclose wherein the second sub-pixel further includes a dummy bank disposed on the bank, corresponding to the second non-emission area. Kim rather discloses on Partition Wall which extends upwards to the capping layer to adequately prevent light leakage in the device . One of ordinary skill in the art could readily derive before the effective filing date to modify the display device of Kim as taught by Kim wherein the first sub-pixel further includes a dummy bank disposed on the bank, corresponding to the first non-emission area the motivation being to prevent light mixing at unwanted boundaries thus increasing light efficiency. Regarding claim 12 Kim discloses (Figures 10-16) wherein the second sub-pixel further includes a capping(CPL2) layer disposed on partition wall (PW)(see rejection six and 11) and the first light scattering layer (CCL2 and π203). Regarding claim 13, Kim discloses (Figures 10-16) (Figure 10) wherein the third sub-pixel (SPX3) includes: a pixel circuit layer(PCL) disposed on the substrate(SUB), the pixel circuit layer (PCL)including a transistor (T); a display element layer(DPL) disposed on the pixel circuit layer (PCL), the display element layer(DPL) including the first light emitting element (LD1 =LD3) disposed in a third emission area; and a second light scattering layer(LSL) disposed on the display element layer(DPL) to overlap the third emission area in a plan view, the second light scattering layer (LSL) including at least one second light scattering particle (π202). Regarding claim 14, Kim (Figures 10-16) (Figure 10) discloses wherein each of the second sub-pixel and the third sub-pixel includes a first light emitting element emitting light of the third color(B), and the first sub-pixel includes a third light emitting element emitting light of the first color(B)(π184) . Regarding claim 15, Kim discloses (Figures 10-16), wherein the second sub-pixel (SPX2) includes a second color conversion layer(CCL2) including at least one second color conversion particle (π193), and each of the first sub-pixel(SPX1) and the third sub-pixel (SPX3) includes a light scattering layer including at least one light scattering particle (π203). Regarding claim 16, Kim discloses wherein light of the first color is red light, light of the second color is green light, and light of the third color is blue light (π67-π68) Regarding claims 17 and 19-20, these claims the rejections of claims 1-16 apply mutatis mutandis to overcome these limitations of these claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found in the 892 provided with this office action and below: US 20230395759 A1- reads upon amendment- a display panel that has a desired display quality. US 20190096324 A1-General State of the Art - organic EL) device includes characteristics such as a reduced thickness and a high contrast ratio. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACIE Y GREEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3104. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thursday, 10am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R Greece can be reached at (571)272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TRACIE Y. GREEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2875 /TRACIE Y GREEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 18, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707776
DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707777
LIGHT-EMITTING SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, DISPLAY PANEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707783
DISPLAY DEVICE USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707820
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701890
DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1408 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month