Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/338,933

IMAGE SENSOR PACKAGE INCLUDING A CHIP STACK STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 21, 2023
Examiner
LEE, EUGENE
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
728 granted / 891 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
930
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 891 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I (claims 1-15) in the reply filed on 12/23/25 is acknowledged. Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/23/25. Claims 11-15 are further withdrawn since claims 11-15 include the limitation “a through silicon via in the logic chip”, which is a feature found exclusively in non-elected Species II. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 thru 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Adkisson et al. US 7,361,989 B1 in view of Lee et al. US 2023/0238411 A1. Adkisson discloses (see, for example, FIG. 7) an image sensor package comprising a package substrate 46, logic chip 32, image sensor chip 28, and bonding wire 52. The logic chip 32 is mounted on the package substrate 46, and the logic chip 32 includes a central region with the image sensor chip 28 being mounted on the central region of the logic chip 32, and the logic chip 32 also including an edge region with connection pads 54. Adkisson does not disclose a dam structure disposed in the edge region of the logic chip and covering a portion of the bonding wire; a cover glass disposed on the dam structure; and an encapsulation structure encapsulating the bonding wire on the package substrate. However, Lee discloses (see, for example, FIG. 4) an image sensor package 100 comprising a sensor chip 2, dam structure 4, cover glass 5, and an encapsulation structure 6. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have a dam structure disposed in the edge region of the logic chip and covering a portion of the bonding wire; a cover glass disposed on the dam structure; and an encapsulation structure encapsulating the bonding wire on the package substrate in order to protect the top of the image sensor and have an optical element for maintaining light transmission to the image sensor chip. Regarding claim 2, see, for example, FIG. 7 wherein Adkission discloses a first area of the logic chip 32 being larger than a second area of the image sensor chip 28. Regarding claim 3, see, for example, FIG. 7 of Adkisson and FIG. 4 of Lee wherein Adkission in view of Lee discloses the third area of the dam structure 4 being larger than the second area of the image sensor chip 28. Regarding claim 4, see, for example, FIG. 7 of Adkisson and FIG. 4 of Lee wherein Adkission in view of Lee discloses the fourth area of the cover glass 5 being larger than the second area of the image sensor chip 28. Regarding claim 5, see, for example, FIG. 7 of Adkisson and FIG. 4 of Lee wherein Adkission in view of Lee discloses the encapsulation structure 6 contacts the outer walls of the logic chip 32, outer walls of the dam structure 4, and outer walls of the cover glass 5. Regarding claim 6, see, for example, FIG. 7 of Adkisson and FIG. 4 of Lee wherein Adkission in view of Lee discloses the encapsulation structure 6 not contacting the image sensor chip 28. Regarding claim 7, see, for example, FIG. 7 wherein Adkission discloses a connection pad 54 disposed on the edge portion of the logic chip 32, wherein the bonding wire 52 is bonded to the connection pad 54. In FIG. 4, Lee discloses the dam structure 4 covers a connection pad 213. Regarding claim 8, see, for example, FIG. 7 wherein Adkisson discloses the logic chip 32 and the image sensor chip 28 being electrically connected to each other by a solder ball 40 disposed therebetween. Regarding claim 9, see, for example, FIG. 7 of Adkisson and FIG. 4 of Lee wherein Adkission in view of Lee discloses the dam structure 4 and the image sensor chip 28 being spaced apart from each other, wherein sidewalls of the dam structure 4 face sidewalls of the image sensor chip 28, and wherein a vertical level of a top surface of the dam structure 4 being higher than a vertical level of a top surface of the image sensor chip 28. Regarding claim 10, Adkisson in view of Lee does not expressly disclose the dam structure comprises glass attach glue; however, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have glass attach glue in order to improve stability between the cover glass and the dam structure. INFORMATION ON HOW TO CONTACT THE USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1733. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 730-330 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Eugene Lee January 3, 2026 /EUGENE LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593460
MULTI-TIER DEEP TRENCH CAPACITOR AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588397
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY DEVICE, WEARABLE DEVICE, AND DISPLAY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588194
METHOD FOR PHYSICALLY UNCLONABLE FUNCTION THROUGH GATE HEIGHT TUNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588569
Buried Seam with Kirigami Pattern for 3D Micro LED Display
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581973
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month