Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/344,218

WAFER-LEVEL PACKAGING STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
TYNES JR., LAWRENCE C
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sj Semiconductor (Jiangyin) Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
649 granted / 763 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 763 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed November 10, 2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1,5,7,8,12 under 35USC102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Tang et al. (US 20210183794 A1; Tang). Upon further review of claims 2 and 9 it is determined the Tang in fact discloses, “wherein the 3D IPD structure comprises one or more of, a 3D capacitive IPD structure, and a 3D resistive IPD structure.” Examiner interpreted the limitation to include a plurality of 3d devices rather than the claimed one or more. US-10433425-B1 discloses a plurality of 3DIPD structures in a molding layer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,5,7,8,12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(A)(1) as being anticipated by Tang et al. (US 20210183794 A1; Tang). 8/10/22 Regarding claim 1, Tang discloses a wafer-level packaging structure, comprising a molding layer (Fig. 2A, 242; ¶71), and a 3D IPD (Integrated Passive Device) structure (Fig. 2A, I-1; ¶64) fabricated in the molding layer, wherein the molding layer includes a first surface (top or bottom) and a second surface (bottom or top) opposite to the first surface, wherein the 3D IPD structure comprises one or more of a 3D inductive IPD structure (¶64), a 3D capacitive IPD structure, and a 3D resistive IPD structure. Regarding claim 5, Tang discloses the wafer-level packaging structure according to claim 1,further comprising a first rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 244; ¶64) formed on the first surface (bottom) of the molding layer and a second rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 144; ¶64) formed on the second surface (top) of the molding layer, wherein the first rewiring layer includes a first dielectric layer (Fig. 2A,250; ¶64) and a first wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62) formed in the first dielectric layer, and wherein the second rewiring layer includes a second dielectric layer (Fig. 2A, 150; ¶64) and a second wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67) formed in the second dielectric layer and connected to the 3D IPD structure. (Fig. 2A, I-1; ¶64) Regarding claim 7, Tang discloses the wafer-level packaging structure according to claim 5, wherein the wafer-level packaging structure is an RE ASIC wafer-level packaging structure, and further comprises: an RE ASIC chip (Fig. 2A, 126; ¶97), formed on a surface of the second rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 144; ¶64) and connected to the second wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67); and solder balls (Fig. 2A, 264; ¶62), formed on a surface of the first rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 244; ¶64) surface and connected to the first wiring metal layer. (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62) Regarding claim 8, Tang discloses a method for preparing a wafer-level packaging structure , including: preparing a molding layer (Fig. 2A, 242; ¶64); and forming a 3D IPD structure (Integrated Passive Device) (Fig. 2A, I-1; ¶64) inside the molding layer, ,wherein the 3D IPD structure comprises one or more of a 3D inductive IPD structure (¶64), a 3D capacitive IPD structure, and a 3D resistive IPD structure.. Regarding claim 12, Tang discloses the method according to claim 8, further comprising: forming a first rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 244; ¶64) on a first surface of the molding layer and a second rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 144; ¶64) on a second surface of the molding layer, (Fig. 2A, 242; ¶64) wherein the first rewiring layer includes a first dielectric layer (Fig. 2A, 250; ¶64) and a first wiring metal layer, (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62) wherein the second rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 144; ¶64) includes a second dielectric layer (Fig. 2A, 150; ¶64) and a second wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67) formed in the second dielectric layer and connected to the 3D IPD structure. (Fig. 2A, I-1; ¶64) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang et al. (US 20210183794 A1; Tang) in view of Liu et al. (US 10433425 B1; Liu). Regarding claim 4, Tang discloses the wafer-level packaging structure according to claim 1, but is silent on wherein the 3D capacitive IPD structure comprises at least one pair of metal layers formed in the molding layer, wherein the at least one pair of metal layers are spaced apart and parallel to each other, wherein said one pair of metal layers are perpendicular to one of the first and second surfaces of the molding layer. Liu discloses a 3D capacitive device structure (Fig. 6, 610b; column 7 lines 58-67) that comprises at least one pair of metal layers (Fig. 6, 615ab; column 7 lines 58-67) formed in the molding layer (Fig. 6, 605; column 7 lines 58-67), wherein the at least one pair of metal layers are spaced apart and parallel to each other, wherein said one pair of metal layers are perpendicular to one of the first and second surfaces of the molding layer. Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to combine a 3d capacitor with a 3d inductor structure for forming a high quality mobile radio frequency chip. Claim(s) 6,13,14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tang et al. (US 20210183794 A1; Tang) in view of Lai et al. (US 20230137691 A1; Lai). Regarding claim 6, Tang discloses the wafer-level packaging structure according to claim 5, wherein the wafer-level packaging structure is a fan-out wafer-level packaging structure, and further comprises: metal connection pillars (Fig. 2A, 216; ¶64), formed in the molding layer (Fig. 2A, 242; ¶64) and connected to the first wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62) and the second wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67); but is silent on chips soldered to the second rewiring layer and connected to the second wiring metal layer; and solder balls, formed on a surface of the first rewiring layer and connected to the first wiring metal layer. Tang discloses chips connected to the second wiring layer but is silent on using solder. Lai discloses a package comprising an IPD structure (Fig. 1k, 54; ¶59) between two wiring layers, (Fig. 1k, 470/420; ¶61,37) and chips (Fig. 1k, 701-703; ¶66) connected to a second wiring layer by solder balls. (Fig. 1k, 490; ¶67) Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to connect the chips by the known method of solder balls for efficient alignment during the coupling process. Regarding claim 13, Tang discloses the e method according to claim 12, further comprising: forming metal connection pillars (Fig. 2A, 216; ¶64) in the molding layer(Fig. 2A, 242; ¶64, wherein the metal connection pillars are connected to the first wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62) and the second wiring metal layer; (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67)… and forming solder balls (Fig. 2A, 264; ¶62) on a surface of the first rewiring layer, (Fig. 2A, 244; ¶64) wherein the solder balls are connected to the first wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62), thereby forming a fan-out wafer-level packaging structure. Tang is silent on soldering chips to the second rewiring layer, wherein the chips are connected to the second wiring metal layer; Tang discloses chips connected to the second wiring layer but is silent on using solder. Lai discloses a package comprising an IPD structure (Fig. 1k, 54; ¶59) between two wiring layers, (Fig. 1k, 470/420; ¶61,37) and chips (Fig. 1k, 701-703; ¶66) connected to a second wiring layer by solder balls. (Fig. 1k, 490; ¶67) Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to connect the chips by the known method of solder balls for efficient alignment during the coupling process. Regarding claim 14, Tang discloses the method according to claim 12, further comprising:, wherein the RF ASIC chip (Fig. 2A, 126; ¶33,97) is connected to the second wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S1/CL1/V1; ¶67); and forming a solder ball (Fig. 2A, 264; ¶62) on a surface of the first rewiring layer (Fig. 2A, 244; ¶64) , wherein the solder balls are connected to the first wiring metal layer (Fig. 2A, S3/CL2/V2; ¶62), thereby forming an RF ASIC wafer- level packaging structure. Tang is silent on soldering an RF ASIC chip to the second rewiring layer Tang discloses RF ASIC chips connected to the second wiring layer but is silent on using solder. Lai discloses a package comprising an IPD structure (Fig. 1k, 54; ¶59) between two wiring layers, (Fig. 1k, 470/420; ¶61,37) and chips (Fig. 1k, 701-703; ¶66) connected to a second wiring layer by solder balls. (Fig. 1k, 490; ¶67) Before the effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to connect the chips by the known method of solder balls for efficient alignment during the coupling process. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 10-11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance, which paraphrases and summarizes the claimed invention without intending to be limiting, wherein the legally defined scope of the claimed invention is defined by the allowed claims themselves in view of the written description under 35 USC 112. This statement is not intended to necessarily state all the reasons for allowance or all the details why the claims are allowed and has not been written to specifically or impliedly state that all the reasons for allowance are set forth (MPEP 1302.14). The art of record discloses IPD comprising capacitors, inductors, and resistor. The art discloses IPDs combining 3D capacitors with 3D inductors. The art appears to be silent on combining 3D resistors with 3D capacitors and 3D inductors. 3D resistors are distinct from typical resistors, which can be as simple as film of resistive material. Regarding claim 3, the references of the Prior Art of record and considered pertinent to the applicant's disclosure and to the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious, at least to the skilled artisan, the instant invention regarding: " first metal solder pads, formed inside the molding layer and extending inwards from the first surface of the molding layer”, as recited in Claim 3, with the remaining features. Regarding claim 10, the references of the Prior Art of record and considered pertinent to the applicant's disclosure and to the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious, at least to the skilled artisan, the instant invention regarding: " forming first metal solder pads on a surface of the release layer, forming metal pillars over ends of the first metal solder pads: forming a molding layer over the release layer to cover the metal pillars and the first metal solder pads, and thinning the molding layer and the metal”, as recited in Claim 10, with the remaining features. Regarding claim 11, the references of the Prior Art of record and considered pertinent to the applicant's disclosure and to the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious, at least to the skilled artisan, the instant invention regarding: " forming a molding layer on a surface of the release layer; etching the molding layer to form at least one pair of parallel openings exposing the release layer, filling the openings with metal materials to form at least one pair of metal layers are spaced apart and to each other”, as recited in Claim 11, with the remaining features. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAWRENCE C TYNES JR. whose telephone number is (571)270-7606. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Zandra Smith can be reached at 571-272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAWRENCE C TYNES JR./ Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Nov 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604595
DISPLAY DEVICE AND SPLICING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593696
CHIP ON FILM PACKAGE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588494
DIE STITCHING AND HARVESTING OF ARRAYED STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575432
CHIP FINE LINE FAN-OUT PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561601
INTELLIGENT SENSOR SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND REALIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 763 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month