Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/344,363

TRANSISTORS WITH RECESSED FIELD PLATES AND METHODS OF FABRICATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
GHEYAS, SYED I
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nxp Usa Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
549 granted / 666 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
688
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 666 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on July 20, 2023, October 25, 2024, & November 25, 2024 were in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II and Species A1 (claims 9-14) in the reply filed on 12/03/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 9, 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Zhu et al. (Pub. No.: US 2023/0197839 A1) in view of Kinzer (Pub. No.: US 2016/0086938 A1). Regarding Claim 9, Zhu et al. discloses a method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: providing a semiconductor substrate (Par. 0023; Fig. 2 – semiconductor substrate 102); PNG media_image1.png 662 974 media_image1.png Greyscale forming a first dielectric layer on the semiconductor substrate (Par. 0029; Fig. 2 – first dielectric layer 115 (field plate dielectric) is formed of silicon oxide or aluminum oxide); forming a second dielectric layer on the first dielectric layer (Par. 0029; Fig. 2 – second dielectric layer 142 is formed of silicon nitride); forming a gate channel and a field plate channel by: performing a first patterned dry etch to form a first opening and a second opening in the second dielectric layer (Par. 0029; Fig. 2 – step 210; a patterned reactive ion etch process 214 is performed to form first opening 216 and second opening 218); and performing a first wet etch to form a third opening Par. 0037; Fig. 2 – step 220; an wet etch process 224 is performed to form a third opening); Par. 0039; Fig. 2 – gate structure 130); and forming a field plate overlapping the gate structure, wherein at least a portion of the field plate is disposed in the field plate channel (Par. 0042; Fig. 2 – field plate 150). Zhu et al. does not disclose a method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: performing a first wet etch to form a fourth opening in the first dielectric layer; forming a third dielectric layer directly on the second dielectric layer and directly on surfaces of the semiconductor substrate exposed through the third opening and the fourth opening; and removing a first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel. However, Kinzer discloses a method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: forming a first dielectric layer on the semiconductor substrate (Par. 0039, 0071; Fig. 5B – first dielectric layer 160); forming a gate channel and a field plate channel by: performing a first etch to form a third opening and a fourth opening in the first dielectric layer (Par. 0071; Fig. 5B); PNG media_image2.png 106 1030 media_image2.png Greyscale forming a third dielectric layer directly on the first dielectric layer and directly on surfaces of the semiconductor substrate exposed through the third opening and the fourth opening (Par. 0073; Fig. 5D – third dielectric layer 180); and removing a first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel (Par. 0073; Fig. 5D). PNG media_image3.png 102 1024 media_image3.png Greyscale In summary, although the end structure taught by Zhu et al. is the same as that taught in the instant application, there are some differences in the methods employed by the two. Whereas the instant application forms the gate structure and the field plate by i) first removing a portion of the first dielectric layer and a portion of the second dielectric layer from the gate channel region and the field plate channel region to expose a top surface of the substrate; ii) depositing a third dielectric layer in both the gate channel and the field plate channel; and iii) removing the third dielectric layer only from the gate channel region before depositing the gate structure in the gate channel, Zhu et al. omits the step of depositing the third dielectric layer entirely. Now, Kinzer teaches, similarly to the instant application, that a third dielectric layer may be deposited after the previously existing dielectric layers are removed from the gate channel region and the field plate channel and then, after such deposition, only a portion of the third dielectric layer located in the gate channel region is removed. Clearly, both methods are viable and commonly practiced ways of making the device, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. Zhu et al. discloses the claimed invention except for a method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: performing a first wet etch to form a fourth opening in the first dielectric layer; forming a third dielectric layer directly on the second dielectric layer and directly on surfaces of the semiconductor substrate exposed through the third opening and the fourth opening; and removing a first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to adapt the method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: performing a first wet etch to form a fourth opening in the first dielectric layer; forming a third dielectric layer directly on the second dielectric layer and directly on surfaces of the semiconductor substrate exposed through the third opening and the fourth opening; and removing a first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to employ/use a known technique to improve similar devices (methods, products) in the same way is obvious. KSR International Co. v Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.__, __, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007) Regarding Claim 11, modified Zhu et al., as applied to claim 9, discloses the method, further comprising: forming an interlayer dielectric layer on the gate structure and the third dielectric layer, wherein the field plate is disposed over the interlayer dielectric layer (Zhu et al. – Par. 0040; Fig. 2 (in light of rejection of claim 9) – dielectric layer 144, under BRI, could be considered as the interlayer dielectric layer). Regarding Claim 12, modified Zhu et al., as applied to claim 11, discloses the method, further comprising: performing a second patterned dry etch to form a seventh opening in the interlayer dielectric layer through which a portion of the third dielectric layer is exposed (Zhu et al. – Par. 0041; Fig. 2 (in light of rejection of claim 9) – in the device of Zhu et al. modified by Kinzer, the third dielectric layer 180 of Kinzer would be (Fig. 5D) sandwiched between the interlayer dielectric layer 144 and the first dielectric layer 115; so when the second patterned dry etch is performed to form a seventh opening in the interlayer dielectric layer in step 250, a portion of the third dielectric layer will get exposed). Claims 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Zhu et al. (Pub. No.: US 2023/0197839 A1) and Kinzer (Pub. No.: US 2016/0086938 A1), as applied to claim 9, further in view of Hua et al. (Patent No.: US 5288660 A). Regarding Claim 10, modified Zhu et al., as applied to claim 9, does not explicitly disclose the method, further comprising: forming a first patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a fifth opening overlapping the gate channel; and forming a second patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a sixth opening overlapping the gate channel, wherein removing the first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel comprises: after forming the first patterned photoresist layer and the second patterned photoresist layer, performing a second wet etch to remove the first portion of the third dielectric layer. However, Hua et al. teaches the method, further comprising: forming a first patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a fifth opening overlapping the gate channel (Col. 4; L 58 – Col. 6, L 8; Fig. 4-14 – first patterned photoresist layer 76); and forming a second patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a sixth opening overlapping the gate channel (Col. 4; L 58 – Col. 6, L 8; Fig. 4-14 – second patterned photoresist layer 78); wherein removing the first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel comprises: PNG media_image4.png 174 370 media_image4.png Greyscale after forming the first patterned photoresist layer and the second patterned photoresist layer, performing a second wet etch to remove the first portion of the third dielectric layer (Col. 4; L 58 – Col. 6, L 8; Fig. 4-14 –dielectric layer 72 could be considered as the third dielectric layer). PNG media_image5.png 204 370 media_image5.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use the teachings of Hua et al. to adapt the method, further comprising: forming a first patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a fifth opening overlapping the gate channel of modified Zhu et al.; and forming a second patterned photoresist layer over the semiconductor substrate having a sixth opening overlapping the gate channel, wherein removing the first portion of the third dielectric layer from the gate channel comprises: after forming the first patterned photoresist layer and the second patterned photoresist layer, performing a second wet etch to remove the first portion of the third dielectric layer in order to perform a clean gate electrode lift-off Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Green et al. (Pub. No.: US 2013/0341678 A1) –This prior art teaches a method of fabricating a transistor device, the method comprising: providing a semiconductor substrate (104); forming a first dielectric layer (130) on the semiconductor substrate ; forming a second dielectric layer (124) on the first dielectric layer; forming a gate channel by: performing a first patterned dry etch (step 614) to form a first opening in the second dielectric layer; and performing a first wet etch (step 616) to form a third opening in the first dielectric layer; forming a gate structure disposed at least partially in the gate channel and in contact with surfaces of the semiconductor substrate (step 618), the first dielectric layer, and the second dielectric layer; and forming a field plate overlapping the gate structure (step 628) (Figs. 6-8). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED I GHEYAS whose telephone number is (571)272-0592. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley, can be reached at telephone number (571)270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 01/27/2026 /SYED I GHEYAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593461
HIGH FREQUENCY HETEROJUNCTION BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588227
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588259
LATERAL BIPOLAR TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581796
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, LIGHT-EMITTING APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND LIGHTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575139
FET WITH MULTI-VALUE SWITCHING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.8%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month