Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/347,014

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2023
Priority
Sep 21, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0119315
Examiner
SENGDARA, VONGSAVANH
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 920 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
998
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.1%
+44.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 2, claims 1-9, 11-14, 16-18, 20-23 corresponding to Fig. 8, in the reply filed on 11/03/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. 20220173191. PNG media_image1.png 389 727 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, fig. 3 of Kim discloses a display device comprising: a base layer SUB; a first conductive layer 110 disposed on the base layer; an gate insulating layer GI1 disposed on the first conductive layer; a first semiconductor layer 210 disposed on the gate insulating layer GI1 and including a silicon semiconductor; a first insulation layer GI2 disposed on the first semiconductor layer; and a second semiconductor layer 410 including an oxide semiconductor (par [0153]) and disposed on the first insulation layer, wherein: the first conductive layer 110 is a first electrode of a first capacitor CST_1; the first semiconductor layer 210 is a second electrode of the first capacitor and a first electrode of a second capacitor (note that 210 and 410 is inherently a capacitor); and the second semiconductor layer 410 is a second electrode of the second capacitor. Kim does not disclose that the gate insulating layer GI1 is an inorganic layer. However, par [0101] of Kim discloses that a third gate insulating layer GI3 may include silicon oxide, silicon nitride, titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, or the like. As such it would have been obvious to form a device comprising wherein the gate insulating layer GI1 is an inorganic layer in order to use a desired material with a desired dielectric constant for a desired capacitance. Kim does not disclose that the first semiconductor layer is one including an oxide semiconductor. However, par [0153] of Kim discloses that a second active pattern 410′ may include an oxide semiconductor. Note that semiconductor can be silicon semiconductor or oxide semiconductor depending on the resistance and speed requirement. As such it would have obvious to form a device comprising wherein the first semiconductor layer is one including an oxide semiconductor instead of silicon semiconductor in order to obtain a desire resistance. Regarding claims 2 and 11, fig. 3 of Kim discloses wherein: the first conductive layer comprises a (1-1)th conductive pattern layer 210 and a (1-2)th conductive pattern layer 220 which are spaced apart from each other in a plan view (this is necessary the case); the first semiconductor layer comprises a (1-1)th semiconductor pattern layer 210 and a (1-2)th semiconductor pattern layer 220 which are spaced apart from each other in a plan view; the second semiconductor layer comprises a (2-1)th semiconductor pattern layer 420 and a (2-2)th semiconductor pattern layer 410 which are spaced apart from each other in a plan view; each of the (1-1)th semiconductor pattern layer 110, the (1-2)th semiconductor pattern layer 210, and the (2-2)th semiconductor pattern layer 410 overlaps the (1-1)th conductive pattern layer 210 in a plan view (this necessary the case); and the (2-1)th semiconductor pattern layer 420 overlaps the (1-2)th conductive pattern layer 220 in a plan view (this necessary the case). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-18, 20-23 allowed. Claims 16 and 20 recites "a first capacitor electrically connected between a first node and a second node; and a second capacitor electrically connected between the second voltage line and the second node ", this feature in combination with the other features of the claim, is not taught by the references of record. Claims 3-9 and 12-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VONGSAVANH SENGDARA whose telephone number is (571)270-5770. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached on (571)272-1236.. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VONGSAVANH SENGDARA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641879
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635586
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12615948
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615921
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607596
Nanostructure platform for cellular interfacing and corresponding manufacturing method
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month