Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/347,723

LASER PROCESSING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Priority
Jul 08, 2022 — JP 2022-110440
Examiner
LESLIE, MICHAEL S
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
DISCO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
934 granted / 1150 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1150 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)&(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hayashi et al (JP 2021192922 A). Hayashi et al disclose a laser processing machine (e.g. 10) for applying a laser beam (e.g. L2) to a workpiece (e.g. 12) that has a plurality of intersecting streets (e.g. C), along the streets to apply processing to the workpiece, the laser processing machine comprising: a holding table (e.g. 20) that holds the workpiece; a laser beam irradiation unit (e.g. 22, 24) that applies the laser beam to the workpiece held on the holding table; an X-axis direction moving unit (e.g. 28, 30) that carries out relative processing feed of the workpiece and an image-forming point of the laser beam in an X-axis direction; and a Y-axis direction moving unit (e.g. 28, 30) that carries out relative indexing feed of the workpiece and the image-forming point of the laser beam in a Y-axis direction orthogonal to the X-axis direction, wherein the laser beam irradiation unit includes a laser oscillator (e.g. 22), an image-forming element (e.g. 40A) that focuses, on the workpiece, the laser beam emitted from the laser oscillator, and a phase modulation unit (e.g. 34) arranged between the laser oscillator and the image-forming element and configured to cause a phase difference in the laser beam such that the laser beam forms an intensity distribution along a Gaussian distribution in the X-axis direction (e.g. Fig. 26) parallel to each street set on the workpiece and forms an intensity distribution along a top-hat profile (e.g. Fig. 25) at the image-forming point in the Y-axis direction as a width direction of the each street set on the workpiece. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hayashi et al (JP 2021192922 A) in view of Moribe (JP 2003220488 A). Hayashi et al disclose a laser processing machine as described above, but do not explicitly teach that the phase modulation unit is a phase plate, and the phase plate includes a recessed portion or a protruding portion formed such that the intensity distribution is formed along the top-hat profile in the Y-axis direction as the width direction of the each street set on the workpiece. Moribe discloses a laser processing machine (e.g. Fig. 2) including a phase modulation unit being a phase plate (e.g. Fig. 2, 3; Fig. 1, 31), and the phase plate includes a recessed portion (e.g. Fig. 1, b) or a protruding portion formed such that the intensity distribution is formed along the top-hat profile in the X-axis direction as the width direction of the each street set on the workpiece. Hayashi et al and Moribe all seek to provide a laser processing machine with phase modulation, thus it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify the laser processing machine of Hayashi et al such that the phase modulation unit is a phase plate, and the phase plate includes a recessed portion or a protruding portion formed such that the intensity distribution is formed along the top-hat profile in the Y-axis direction as the width direction of the each street set on the workpiece, as taught by Moribe, for the purpose of forming the intensity distribution along the top-hat profile. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Additional references listed on form PTO-892 are cited for their relevance to the disclosed invention and demonstration of the state of the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL LESLIE whose telephone number is (571)272-4819. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8 am - 4-30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571)272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL LESLIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 September 18, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729663
POWER GENERATION FROM MOVING WATER
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729699
WORK MACHINE ACCESSORY MOTOR LOAD PROTECTION
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723605
Construction Machine
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723603
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A FLOW-ISOLATED VALVE ARRANGEMENT AND A THREE-CHAMBER CYLINDER HYDRAULIC ARCHITECTURE
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716201
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1150 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month