Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/347,927

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Priority
Oct 11, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0129832 +1 more
Examiner
PAGE, STEVEN MITCHELL CHR
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
378 granted / 454 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
472
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 454 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-6, 10-13, 15-16, and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by YOON et al. (US 20220181457 A1, hereinafter Yoon) With regards to claim 1, Yoon discloses a semiconductor memory device, (FIGS. 1-17) comprising: a substrate (substrate 100) including a first source/drain region (source 130a) and a second source/drain region; (drain 130b) a trench (recess 104) in the substrate between the first source/drain region and the second source/drain region; (See FIG. 17) a cell gate insulating layer (gate insulation layer 106) on at least a portion of sidewalls and a bottom surface of the trench; a cell gate electrode (metal 112a) on at least a portion of the cell gate insulating layer; a work function control pattern (layers 116, 118, and 120a) on the cell gate electrode, the work function control pattern including N-type impurities; and a cell gate capping pattern (cap 122) on the work function control pattern, wherein; the work function control pattern includes a first region (region including 99% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 2) and a second region (“L-shaped” region, which includes pattern 116 and 1% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 1)) between the first region and the cell gate electrode, each of the first region and the second region includes a semiconductor material, (polysilicon of layer 120a, where 99% of layer 120a is in the first region, and where 1% of layer 120a is in the second region) and a concentration of the N-type impurities in the first region is greater than that of the N- type impurities in the second region. (Paragraph [0042]: “A concentration of the nitrogen included in the upper barrier interface layer pattern 118 may be higher/greater than a concentration of the nitrogen included in the barrier interface layer pattern 116, e.g. greater by several orders of magnitude.” See FIGS. 2 and 17, where the concentration of nitrogen in the first region (which comprises 99% of layer 118) would be higher than the concentration of nitrogen in the second region (which comprises 1% of layer 118), see also Response to Arguments) PNG media_image1.png 758 882 media_image1.png Greyscale With regards to claim 2, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, wherein a concentration of the N-type impurities in the work function control pattern is reduced as the work function control pattern becomes farther away from the cell gate capping pattern. (Paragraph [0042]: “A concentration of the nitrogen included in the upper barrier interface layer pattern 118 may be higher/greater than a concentration of the nitrogen included in the barrier interface layer pattern 116, e.g. greater by several orders of magnitude.” Thus, the concentration is reduced from a distance from the cap 122) With regards to claim 3, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, wherein the concentration of the N-type impurities in the first region is increased and then decreased as the first region becomes farther away from the gate capping pattern. (Paragraph [0042]-[0046]: “A concentration of the nitrogen included in the upper barrier interface layer pattern 118 may be higher/greater than a concentration of the nitrogen included in the barrier interface layer pattern 116, e.g. greater by several orders of magnitude…In some example embodiments, the second gate pattern 120a may include a semiconductor material doped with N-type impurities such as at least one of arsenic or phosphorus, or P-type impurities such as boron.” Thus, the concentration of nitrogen increases then decreases away from the cap) With regards to claim 5, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, wherein the N-type impurities type include phosphorus. (Paragraph [0046]: “In some example embodiments, the second gate pattern 120a may include a semiconductor material doped with N-type impurities such as at least one of arsenic or phosphorus, or P-type impurities such as boron.”) With regards to claim 6, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, wherein the second region further includes P-type impurities. (Paragraph [0046]: “In some example embodiments, the second gate pattern 120a may include a semiconductor material doped with N-type impurities such as at least one of arsenic or phosphorus, or P-type impurities such as boron.”) With regards to claim 10, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, further comprising a barrier layer (barrier metal 110a) between the cell gate electrode and the work function control pattern. (See FIG. 16) With regards to claim 11, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 1, wherein a work function of the first region is smaller than a work function of the second region, and the work function of the second region is smaller than a work function of the cell gate electrode. (Paragraphs [0040]-[0048]: “the barrier interface layer pattern 116 may include at least one of tungsten nitride (WNx) and tungsten oxynitride (WxOyNz)…For example, the metal pattern 112a may include tungsten, and in this case, the first work function may be about 4.58 eV…the second gate pattern 120a may have a second work function different from the first work function. The second work function may be lower than/less than the first work function.”) With regards to claim 12, Yoon discloses a semiconductor memory device, (FIGS. 1-17) comprising: a substrate (substrate 100) including an active region (active region 130) defined by an element isolation layer; (dielectric 142) a bit line (bit line 430) extending in a first direction on the substrate; an information storage element (capacitor 442) at opposing sides of the bit line and connected to the active region; and a cell gate structure (gate 114) extending in a second direction crossing the first direction in the substrate, wherein the cell gate structure includes: a trench (trench 104) in the substrate; a cell gate insulating layer (insulation layer 106) on at least a portion of sidewalls and a bottom surface of the trench; a cell gate electrode (metal 112a) on at least a portion of the cell gate insulating layer; a barrier layer (barrier 110a) on at least a portion of the cell gate electrode; and a work function control pattern (layers 116, 118, and 120a) on the barrier layer, wherein the work function control pattern includes a first region (region including 99% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 2) including N-type impurities, (nitrogen in layer 118) and a second region and a second region (“L-shaped” region, which includes pattern 116 and 1% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 2)) between the first region and the cell gate electrode, (see FIG. 17) each of the first region and the second region includes a semiconductor material, (polysilicon of layer 120a, where 99% of layer 120a is in the first region, and where 1% of layer 120a is in the second region, see also Response to Arguments) and With regards to claim 13, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 12, wherein a concentration of the N- type impurities in the first region is greater than a concentration of the N-type impurities in the second region. (Paragraph [0042]: “A concentration of the nitrogen included in the upper barrier interface layer pattern 118 may be higher/greater than a concentration of the nitrogen included in the barrier interface layer pattern 116, e.g. greater by several orders of magnitude.” See FIGS. 1 and 17, where the concentration of nitrogen in the first region (which comprises 99% of layer 118) would be higher than the concentration of nitrogen in the second region (which comprises 1% of layer 118), see also Response to Arguments) With regards to claim 15, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 12, wherein the second region includes P-type impurities. (Paragraph [0046]: “In some example embodiments, the second gate pattern 120a may include a semiconductor material doped with N-type impurities such as at least one of arsenic or phosphorus, or P-type impurities such as boron.”) With regards to claim 16, Yoon discloses the semiconductor memory device of claim 12, wherein a work function of the second region is smaller than a work function of the cell gate electrode. (Paragraphs [0040]-[0048]: “the barrier interface layer pattern 116 may include at least one of tungsten nitride (WNx) and tungsten oxynitride (WxOyNz)…For example, the metal pattern 112a may include tungsten, and in this case, the first work function may be about 4.58 eV…the second gate pattern 120a may have a second work function different from the first work function. The second work function may be lower than/less than the first work function.”) With regards to claim 18, Yoon discloses a semiconductor memory device, (FIGS. 1-17) comprising: a substrate (substrate 100) including an active region (active region 130) defined by an element isolation layer (isolation region 142) and extending in a first direction, the active region including a first portion and a second portion at opposing sides of the first portion; (130a,130b) a cell gate structure (gate 114) extending in a second direction in the substrate and the element isolation layer, crossing between the first portion of the active region and the second portion of the active region; a bit line (bit line 430) extending in a third direction on the substrate and the element isolation layer and connected to the first portion of the active region; a storage contact (contact 440) at opposing sides of the bit line and connected to the second portion of the active region; a storage pad (pad 442a) connected to the storage contact on the storage contact; and a capacitor (capacitor 442) connected to the storage pad on the storage pad, wherein the cell gate structure includes: a trench (trench 104) in the substrate; a cell gate insulating layer (insulation layer 106) on at least a portion of sidewalls and a bottom surface of the trench; a cell gate electrode (electrode 112a) on at least a portion of the cell gate insulating layer; a work function control pattern on at least a portion of the cell gate electrode, the work function control pattern including N-type impurities; a cell gate capping pattern (layers 116, 118, and 120a) on at least a portion of the work function control pattern, the work function control pattern includes a first region (region including 99% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 2) and a second region (“L-shaped” region, which includes pattern 116 and 1% of barrier 118 and pattern 120a, see annotated FIG. 2)) between the first region and the cell gate electrode, each of the first region and the second region includes a semiconductor material, (polysilicon of layer 120a, where 99% of layer 120a is in the first region, and where 1% of layer 120a is in the second region, see also Response to Arguments) a concentration of the N-type impurities in the first region is greater than a concentration of the N-type impurities in the second region. (Paragraph [0042]: “A concentration of the nitrogen included in the upper barrier interface layer pattern 118 may be higher/greater than a concentration of the nitrogen included in the barrier interface layer pattern 116, e.g. greater by several orders of magnitude.” See FIGS. 2 and 17, where the concentration of nitrogen in the first region (which comprises 99% of layer 118) would be higher than the concentration of nitrogen in the second region (which comprises 1% of layer 118), see also Response to Arguments) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 7-9, 14, 17, and 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner notes that the term “region” is incredibly broad, and Examiner can draw imaginary boundaries to represent each region. Thus, based on the annotated FIG. 1 shown above, the second region now includes a small sliver of the semiconductor of layer 120a while still meeting the criteria of having less concentration of nitrogen, as required in claims 1, 12, and 18. Therefore, claims 1, 12, and 18 are properly rejected, and claims 2-3, 5-6, 10-11, 13, and 15-16 are rejected for at least their dependencies. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. TSAI (US 20240015951 A1) – different work functions in a trench gate. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN M Page whose telephone number is (571)272-3249. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S. Kim can be reached at 571-272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN M PAGE/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685002
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685166
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677406
MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677411
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670368
TUNABLE HOMOJUNCTION FIELD EFFECT DEVICE-BASED ARTIFICIAL SYNAPSE CIRCUIT AND IMPLEMENTATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 454 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month