Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/348,938

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 07, 2023
Priority
Jul 20, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0089500
Examiner
FAROKHROOZ, FATIMA N
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
413 granted / 851 resolved
-19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
901
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
96.7%
+56.7% vs TC avg
§102
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 851 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed by the Applicant on 3/2/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention before the effective filing date. Claims 1-4, 7-9 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 20180211979 A1) Regarding claim 1, Lee teaches a display device (at least Fig.1 and 6) comprising: a first substrate (50 to 105) comprising pixel circuit units ([0076]); a plurality of light-emitting elements (135 and DA) on the first substrate; wavelength conversion layers (340R/G/B) above the plurality of light-emitting elements; partition walls (110 and 130) filling gaps between the light-emitting elements and spaced between the wavelength conversion layers, wherein a first width of a first portion of a partition wall of the partition walls between the light-emitting elements is greater than a second width of a second portion of the partition wall (372,[0098]) between the wavelength conversion layers. Lee teaches a width of a wavelength conversion layer of the wavelength conversion layers (340R/G/B) remains substantially ([0100] in Lee) same (see the arrows that show the deviation from the width as claimed) PNG media_image1.png 312 394 media_image1.png Greyscale along a thickness direction of the first substrate, but does not teach: a width of a wavelength conversion layer of the wavelength conversion layers remains same. However, it is well known in the art to use either a slightly inclined sides or a perfectly vertical sides of a wavelength conversion layer such that the width of a wavelength conversion layer of the wavelength conversion layers remains same along a thickness direction of the first substrate and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the same width along the thickness direction of the first substrate, for the wavelength conversion layer of Lee in order to save space. Regarding claim 2, Lee teaches a display device; wherein the partition wall comprises an organic insulating material ([0070). Regarding claim 3, Lee teaches a display device; further comprising: a plurality of pixel electrodes on the pixel circuit units; and connecting electrodes between the pixel electrodes and the light-emitting elements (125 and 145, [0136]). Regarding claim 4, Lee teaches a display device; further comprising: a light-blocking member (362 in [0102]) on the partition wall; and color filters on the wavelength conversion layers. Regarding claim 7, Lee teaches a display device, further comprising first reflective layers on sides of each of the light-emitting elements ([0013], [0066], [0121]); and second reflective layers on sides of each of the wavelength conversion layers ([0102]). Regarding claim 8, Lee teaches a display device, wherein: first surfaces of the second reflective layers 362 are in contact with the sides of each of the wavelength conversion layers (although the light filtering layer 350 is in between the wavelength conversion layer and the reflective layer 362, the light filtering layer is an optional layer, as known in the art); and second surfaces of the second reflective layers 362 are in contact with the partition wall 372. Regarding claim 9, Lee teaches a display device, wherein: the wavelength conversion layers are longer than the light-emitting elements in a vertical direction perpendicular to a thickness direction; but does not teach the display device further comprises third reflective layers at bottoms of parts of the wavelength conversion layers, the third reflective layer not overlapping with the light-emitting elements. However, since Lee teaches multiple elements surrounding the light emitting elements that have reflective surfaces and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to change the location of the reflective element, to the third reflective layers at bottoms of parts of the wavelength conversion layers, the third reflective layer not overlapping with the light-emitting elements, by routine experimentation in order to enhance light. Regarding claim 13, Lee teaches a display device, wherein: the light-emitting elements comprise first, second, and third light-emitting elements configured to emit first light, second light, and third light, respectively ([0091], [0080]); and the wavelength conversion layers comprise a base resin ([0111]) and a scatterer ([0112], [0100]) configured to scatter light. Regarding claim 14, Lee teaches a display device, wherein: the light-emitting elements comprise first, second, and third light-emitting elements configured to emit first light, second light, and third light ([0091]), respectively, and are located in first, second, and third emission areas, respectively; and the wavelength conversion layers comprise a light-transmitting pattern ([0098]) in the first emission area and comprise a first base resin and a first scatterer configured to scatter light, a first wavelength conversion pattern in the second emission area and comprising a second base resin, a second scatterer configured to scatter light, and first wavelength conversion particles configured to convert the first light to the second light, and a second wavelength conversion pattern in the third emission area and comprising a third base resin, a third scatterer configured to scatter light, and second wavelength conversion particles configured to convert the first light to the third light (also see rejection in claim 13 above). Claims 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Choe (US 20200381484 A1, cited previously) Regarding claim 5, Lee teaches the invention set forth in claim 4 above, but is silent regarding lenses on the light-emitting elements in the spaces to condense light. Choe teaches a display device wherein lenses LP ([0102]) are formed on the light-emitting elements (DP-EDL in [0089],[0105]) in the spaces to condense light ([0117] and [0119]) and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use lens array, as disclosed in Choe, in the device of Lee in order to control the traveling direction. Regarding claim 6, Choe does not explicitly teach lenses on the color filters to condense light. However, Choe already teaches lens arrange facing the light emitting layer, therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to change the location of the lens from top of the light emitting layer, to the top of the color filter, since the provision of changing of location of the lenses, from the teachings of Choe, to a location of a color filter, involves only routine skill in the art. Claims 10 and 11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Jeon (US 20220115564 A1 cited previously) and further in view of Kwak (US 20200212267 A1 cited previously) Regarding claim 10, Lee teaches the invention set forth in claim 3 above, but does not teach: a first insulating layer on parts of the first substrate where the pixel electrodes are not located; and a second insulating layer on sides of each of the light-emitting elements, and parts of the first insulating layer where the light-emitting elements are located, wherein the second insulating layer includes openings on the top surfaces of the light-emitting elements. Jeon teaches display device (Fig.3,5, 12 or 13), further comprising: a first insulating layer (section PNG media_image2.png 489 373 media_image2.png Greyscale of INS as shown above) on parts of the first substrate where the pixel electrodes PXE (see in Choi: The pixel electrodes PXE may be disposed on the insulating layer ISO) are not located; and a second insulating layer (vertical section of INS surrounding the light emitting device LDC1, shown in Drawing above) on sides of each of the light-emitting elements (see in Jeon: since each of the light emitting diode devices LDC is a vertical light emitting diode device), and parts of the first insulating layer where the light-emitting elements are located, wherein the second insulating layer includes openings on the top surfaces of the light-emitting elements and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the insulating layer as disclosed in Jeon, in the device of Lee, in order to keep the electrodes insulated from one another. Lee in view of Jeon does not teach the second insulating layer on a top surface of the light emitting elements, and sides of each of the connecting electrodes. Kwak teaches connecting electrodes 131 (Fig.3M) wrapping around the light emitting element 150 ([0052]) wherein an insulating layer (171 and 172) is formed on a top surface of the light emitting elements ([0091]: For example, the first reflector 171 may be formed of an insulating material containing fine particles for reflection of light; [0095] The second reflector 172 may be formed by stacking dielectric layers having different refractive indexes) and sides of each of the connecting electrodes (horizontal portion 131) and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the insulating and connecting electrode layers as disclosed in Kwak, in the device of Lee in view of Jeon, in order to provide reflection by using the insulating layers. Regarding claim 11 Lee in view of Jeon and Kwak) teaches a display device, further comprising: a common electrode (CE, last line of [0103]) on the second insulating layer (171 and 172 of Kwak) and electrically connected to the light-emitting elements through the openings. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Park (US 20200075814 A1, herein after Park,cited previously) Regarding claim 12, Lee teaches the invention set forth in claim 1, but does not teach a width of the partition wall between the light-emitting elements is less than or equal to a width of the light-emitting elements. Park teaches a display device (Fig.3); a width of the partition wall PDL ([0087]) between the light-emitting elements is less than or equal to a width of the light-emitting elements (LD, [0088]). PNG media_image3.png 251 255 media_image3.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the dimensions, as disclosed in Park, in the device of Lee, in order to reliably connect to the electrodes. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Chen (US 20240072018 A1, cited previously) Regarding claim 15, Lee teaches the invention set forth in claim 1, but does not teach each of the light-emitting elements comprises a first semiconductor layer, an active layer on the first semiconductor layer, and a second semiconductor layer on the active layer. Chen teaches a display device (Fig.5 and 6), wherein each of the light-emitting elements comprises a first semiconductor layer S1, an active layer A1 on the first semiconductor layer, and a second semiconductor layer S2 ([0025],[0049],[0050]) on the active layer and it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the layers as disclosed in Chen, in the device of Lee, in order to improve luminous efficiency. Other art Cited previously: WO 2022050771 A1; US 20220199682 A1; KR 20220049065 A; US 20220130922 A1 US 20210376192 A1/US 20220068973 A1-insulator; US 20210367104 A1 US 20220165816 A1; CN 113841246 A Response to Arguments The arguments filed by the Applicant on 3/2/26 is acknowledged, however, they are moot in light of new grounds of rejection for the amended claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Fatima Farokhrooz whose telephone number is (571)-272-6043. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday- Friday, 9 am - 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s Supervisor, James Greece can be reached on (571) 272-3711. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Fatima N Farokhrooz/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 02, 2026
Response Filed
May 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681230
LIGHT GUIDE MEMBER FOR LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE AND LIGHT EMISSION DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681225
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677710
ALL-INORGANIC UP-CONVERSION DISPLAY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12655952
Flush Glass Adjustable Lighting Fixture
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12627118
IGNITION SYSTEM AND IGNITER HAVING RUTHENIUM GROUND ELECTRODE AND PLATINUM-IRIDIUM ALLOY CENTER ELECTRODE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+33.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 851 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month