Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/357,478

ELECTRODE PLATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Priority
Jan 18, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022072475
Examiner
USYATINSKY, ALEXANDER
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
740 granted / 893 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
81.0%
+41.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) filed 07/24/2023, 03/03/2025 and 03/03/2025 have been placed in the application file and the information referred to therein has been considered. Drawings The drawings received 07/24/2023 are acceptable for examination purposes. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-3, 10, 12, 13, 15 and 16 in the reply filed on 02/13/2026 is acknowledged. Claims Status. This Office Action is responsive to the amendment filed on 02/13/2026. Claims 1-16 were pending. Claims 1-16 are now pending. Claims 2-9, 11 and 14 are withdrawn from examination as being drawn to non-elected invention Claims 1-3, 10, 12, 13, 15 and 16 are presented for examination. Applicant's arguments have been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by CN 110752345 to Du (Du machine translation). Regarding claim 1, Du discloses an electrode plate (electrode sheet, Claim 1) comprising a current collector and an electrode active material layer disposed on at least one surface of the current collector (claim 1), wherein the electrode active material layer has a maximum porosity on an outer surface side thereof (para 15, This results in an electrode sheet with gradually increasing porosity from the surface near the current collector to the surface away from the current collector, i.e., an electrode sheet with gradient porosity). Therefore, instant claim 1 is anticipated by Du. Regarding claim 2, Du discloses wherein the electrode active material layer has a minimum porosity on a bottom surface side thereof that is opposite the outer surface side (para 15). Regarding claim 3, Du discloses wherein a compacted density for the positive electrode is 2.3 g/cm3 and a compacted density for the negative electrode is 1.5 g/cm3. It is noted that a specific example in the prior art which is within a claimed range anticipates the range. See MPEP 2131.03 Regarding claim 10, Du discloses a secondary battery (para 4).\ Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 12, 13, 15 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over CN 110752345 to Du (Du machine translation) in view of US 2007/0009797 to Takami (Takami). Regarding claim 12, Du discloses the invention as discussed above as applied to claim 10 and incorporated therein. Du does not expressly disclose a battery module, battery pack or electrical apparatus comprising above mentioned battery module and battery pack. Takami teaches a secondary battery (para 81), comprising porous electrode layers ( para 49), a battery module ( para 90, re claim 12) and a battery pack (para 90, re claim 13), both used in in vehicle (para 104, claim 20, re claims 15 and 16). Therefore, a use batteries having porous electrodes in the battery packs, battery modules and electrical devices such a vehicles is well known in the art. It would have been obvious to one or ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the high energy density battery of Du within battery module and battery back for vehicles, as taught by Takami, in order to expand a field of applicability said batteries. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDER USYATINSKY whose telephone number is (571)270-7703. The examiner can normally be reached IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at (571) 270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Alexander Usyatinsky/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683175
REDOX FLOW BATTERY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING REDOX FLOW BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676388
RECHARGEABLE BATTERY WITH MOVABLE ELECTRODE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676375
BATTERY CASE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665261
CELL CONNECTOR FOR CONNECTING ROUND CELLS OF A BATTERY
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665265
APPARATUS FOR MAGNETIC FLUX GENERATION ON BUSBARS OF A RECONFIGURABLE BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month