Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/357,484

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Examiner
LE, THAO P
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
740 granted / 800 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 800 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/24/23 is filed after the mailing date of the application. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-12, 14-16, 19, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ko et al., U.S. Publication No. 2022/0020701. Regarding claim 1, Ko discloses: A semiconductor package, comprising (Fig. 2): a lower part having a first region and a second region horizontally offset from one another, the lower part including a connection structure 110 within the first region and a logic chip 100 within the second region (110 and 100 representing the first and second regions, respectively, are offset from each other). a memory structure 20 [0019] that overlaps the connection structure in a vertical direction, and a thermal radiation structure (600 + 700), that overlaps the logic chip in the vertical direction, wherein the logic chip and the memory structure are spaced apart in a horizontal direction parallel to a top surface of the logic chip (100 and 20 are spaced apart from each other in the horizontal direction which is parallel to the top surface of the chip 100). Regarding claim 2, Ko discloses the lower part further includes a pad layer 119 on the connection structure and the logic chip, the package further comprises a pad solder (Fig. 2) between the pad layer and the memory structure, and the pad layer includes a conductive pad that electrically connects the connection structure and the pad solder to each other (Figs. 2-3). Regarding claim 4, Ko discloses (Fig. 3) wherein the connection includes a through connector, wherein the through connector includes: a first connector 511, a second connector 150, a third connector 115, a fourth connector 113, a fifth connector 117. Regarding claim 5, Ko discloses: wherein a width of the third connector 115 is greater than a width of an upper portion of the second connector 150, and a width of an upper portion of the fourth connector 113 is less than a width of the firth connector 117 and greater than a width of a lower portion of the fourth connector 113 (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 6, Ko discloses wherein the width of the second connector decreases in a direction from top to bottom portions of the second connector (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 7, Ko discloses wherein the thermal radiation structure includes or is composed of copper [0036]. Regarding claim 8, Ko discloses wherein the thermal radiation structure 700 completely overlaps the logic chip 100 in the vertical direction, and a width of the thermal radiation structure is greater than a width of the logic chip in the horizontal direction (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 9, Ko discloses wherein the lower part further includes: a redistribution substrate that includes a redistribution pattern, and a connection solder between the connection structure and the redistribution pattern of the redistribution substrate [0023]. Regarding claim 10, Ko discloses: A semiconductor package, comprising (Fig. 2): a lower part having a first region and a second region horizontally offset from one another, the lower part including a connection structure 110 within the first region and a logic chip 100 within the second region. a memory structure 20 that overlaps the connection structure in a vertical direction, and a thermal radiation structure (600 + 700) on the second region and overlapping the semiconductor chip in the vertical direction, wherein the connection structure and the thermal radiation structure do not overlap each other in the vertical direction (Fig. 2, at least part of the thermal radiation 600 + 700 structure does not overlap connection structure 110 in the vertical direction). Regarding claim 11, Ko discloses (Fig. 3) wherein the connection includes a through connector, wherein the through connector includes: a first connector 511, a second connector 150, a third connector 115, a fourth connector 113, a fifth connector 117, wherein a width of the third connector 115 is greater than a width of an upper portion of the second connector 150, and a width of an upper portion of the fourth connector 113 is less than a width of the firth connector 117 and greater than a width of a lower portion of the fourth connector 113 (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 12, Ko discloses wherein the thermal radiation structure 700 completely overlaps the logic chip 100 in the vertical direction, and a width of the thermal radiation structure is greater than a width of the logic chip in the horizontal direction (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 14, Ko discloses wherein the thermal conductivity of the thermal radiation (copper) is greater than a thermal conductivity of the chip. Regarding claim 15, Ko discloses the lower part further includes a redistribution substrate and the package further comprises a passive element (in substrate 111) [0021]. Regarding claim 16, Ko discloses wherein the lower part further includes a connection solder between the redistribution substrate and the connection structure and the redistribution substrate (the layer that includes connection line 117) and the connection structure are electrically connected to each other through the connection solder ([0023], Fig. 2). Regarding claim 19, Ko discloses the connection structure includes a lower connection dielectric layer, and a bottom surface of the lower connection dielectric layer (the layer where connections are embedded, Fig. 3) is at a vertical lever lower than bottom surface of the chip (the chip is on top of the connection structure, therefore the connection dielectric layer is lower than the bottom surface of the chip, Fig. 2). Regarding claim 20, Ko discloses a lower part including a redistribution substrate (the substrate in Fig. 2, the other parts not considered 110, [0023, 0041]), a connection structure 110, and a semiconductor chip 100, the connection structure and the chip being electrically connected to the redistribution substrate [0023, 0041], a memory structure 20 that overlaps the connection structure 110 in a vertical direction, a thermal radiation structure 700 that overlaps an entirety of the chip in vertical direction, wherein a width of the thermal radiation structure is greater than a width of the chip in a horizontal direction (Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko et al., U.S. Publication No. 2022/0020701, in view of Kwon, U.S. Publication No. 2019/0348340. Regarding claims 3, 13, Ko fails to disclose the thermal radiation structure wherein the thermal radiation member further includes the adhesion layer, the pad layer and the thermal radiation member are attached through the adhesive layer and the adhesion layer overlaps the second region in the vertical direction. Kwon discloses the thermal radiation structure 140 further includes an adhesive layer 141 (Fig. 1I). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have adhesive layer between the chip and the thermal radiation in order to attach the thermal radiation to the chip. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko et al., U.S. Publication No. 2022/0020701, in view of Kim, U.S. Patent No. 9,978,731. Regarding claim 17, Ko fails to disclose the connection structure includes a PCB substrate. Kim discloses the semiconductor package including a connection structure wherein the connection structure includes a PCB substrate (Col. 8). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use PCB substrate in order to obtain a better thermal radiation, improve electrical connection, and to support or protect the chip. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko et al., U.S. Publication No. 2022/0020701, in view of Hwang, U.S. 2023/0105942. Regarding claim 18, Ko fails to disclose the connection includes a lower connection dielectric layer, a connection molding layer on the lower connection dielectric layer, an upper connection dielectric layer on the connection molding layer, and a through connector that penetrates the upper connection dielectric layer and the connection molding layer. Hwang discloses the connection includes a lower connection dielectric layer 310, a connection molding layer 310/320 on the lower connection dielectric layer (the layer where 122 embedded, Fig. 8), an upper connection dielectric layer on the connection molding layer 310/320, and a through connector that penetrates the upper connection dielectric layer 510 and the connection molding layer 310/320 [0017]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to apply Hwang’s in Ko’s device in order to improve electrical connectivity. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THAO P LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1785. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Natalini can be reached on 571-272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /THAO P LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 31, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604768
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599030
Power Semiconductor Module System and Method for Producing the Power Semiconductor Module System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575380
EVALUATION METHOD FOR SILICON CARBIDE SUBSTRATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568826
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557299
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICES AND FABRICATING METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (-1.3%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month