Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/364,585

JUNCTION FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR WITH BOTTOM GATE UNDERLYING DRAIN AND OPTIONALLY PARTIALLY UNDERLYING TOP GATE AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 03, 2023
Examiner
DIAZ, JOSE R
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Globalfoundries Singapore Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
799 granted / 922 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
948
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 922 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, e.g. claims 1-8, 17-18 and 20, in the reply filed on January 9, 2016 is acknowledged. Please note that claim 19 is withdrawn from further consideration as being drawn to a nonelected Species. See Restriction Requirement mailed on December 30, 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 17-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shepard et al. (US 2015/0214384). Regarding claim 1, Shepard discloses a structure comprising: a semiconductor layer (101) [Fig. 1]; and a transistor including, within the semiconductor layer (101): a channel region (106) [Fig. 1]; a drain region (108) and a source region (108) above the channel region [Fig. 1]; a first gate region (Bottom p-Gate 104) below the channel region [Fig. 1]; and a second gate region (107) above the channel region positioned laterally between the drain region (108) and the source region (108) [Fig. 1], wherein the first gate region (104) underlies the drain region (108) and is offset (horizontally and/or vertically offset) from the source region (108) and at least a portion of the second gate region (107) adjacent to the source region (108) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 2, Shepard discloses isolation structures (STI) between the second gate region (Top Gate p+ 107) and the source region (108) and the drain region (108) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 3, Shepard discloses wherein the first gate region (104) is completely offset (vertically offset) from the source region (108) and the second gate region (107) and has an end (interface between 104 and 105) below an isolation structure (STI) between the second gate region (consider portion of the M-shaped region 107 sandwiched between adjacent STI regions and positioned above PW 105) and the drain region (108) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 4, Shepard discloses wherein the first gate region (104) only partially underlies the second gate region (M-shaped region 107) and has an end (interface between 104 and 105) below the second gate region (consider portion of the M-shaped region 107 sandwiched between adjacent STI regions and positioned above PW 105) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 5, Shepard discloses wherein the transistor further includes a gate link-up region (PW 105) in the semiconductor layer immediately adjacent to the first gate region (104), positioned laterally immediately adjacent to the channel region (106), and further separated from the drain region (108) by an isolation structure (STI) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 17, Shepard discloses a method comprising: providing a semiconductor layer (101) [Fig. 1]; and forming a transistor that includes, within the semiconductor layer: a channel region (106) [Fig. 1]; a drain region (108) and a source region (108) above the channel region [Fig. 1]; a first gate region (104) below the channel region [Fig. 1]; and a second gate region (Top Gate p+ 107) above the channel region positioned laterally between the drain region (108) and the source region (108) [Fig. 1], wherein the first gate region (104) underlies the drain region (108) and is offset (horizontally and/or vertically offset) from the source region (108) and at least a portion of the second gate region (Top Gate p+ 107) adjacent to the source region (108) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 18, Shepard discloses: wherein the semiconductor layer (101) includes a semiconductor substrate (P-sub) [Fig. 1], wherein the method includes forming a buried well region (103) in the semiconductor substrate [Fig. 1], and wherein the forming of the transistor includes forming the transistor above the buried well region (103) [Fig. 1]. Regarding claim 20, Shepard discloses wherein the first gate region (104) has an end (interface between 104 and 105) either below an isolation structure (STI) between the drain region (108) and the second gate region (portion of the M-shaped region 107 sandwiched between adjacent STI regions and positioned above PW 105) or below the second gate region [Fig. 1]. Claims 1-5, 17-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Koga (US 2024/0332430). Regarding claim 1, Koga discloses a structure comprising: a semiconductor layer (41/42) [Fig. 3]; and a transistor including, within the semiconductor layer (41/42): a channel region (12/13) [Fig. 3 and paragraph 0061]; a drain region (11) and a source region (10) above the channel region [Fig. 3]; a first gate region (7,71,72) below the channel region [Fig. 3]; and a second gate region (8) above the channel region positioned laterally between the drain region (108) and the source region (108) [Fig. 3], wherein the first gate region (7,71,72) underlies the drain region (11) and is offset (horizontally and/or vertically offset) from the source region (7, 71,72) and at least a portion of the second gate region (8) adjacent to the source region (10) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 2, Koga discloses isolation structures (14) between the second gate region (8) and the source region (10) and the drain region (11) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 3, Koga discloses wherein the first gate region (72) is completely offset (vertically and/or horizontally offset, respectively) from the source region (10) and the second gate region (8) and has an end (interface between portion 75 and portion 73, or between portion 75 and region 13) below an isolation structure (14) between the second gate region (8) and the drain region (11) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 4, Koga discloses wherein the first gate region (71 or 72) only partially underlies the second gate region (8) and has an end (interface between 71 and 72) below the second gate region (8) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 5, Koga discloses wherein the transistor further includes a gate link-up region (77) in the semiconductor layer immediately adjacent to the first gate region (7,71,72), positioned laterally immediately adjacent to the channel region (12), and further separated from the drain region (11) by an isolation structure (14) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 17, Koga discloses a method comprising: providing a semiconductor layer (41/42) [Fig. 3]; and forming a transistor that includes, within the semiconductor layer: a channel region (12/13) [Fig. 3 and paragraph 0061]; a drain region (11) and a source region (10) above the channel region [Fig. 3]; a first gate region (7,71,72) below the channel region [Fig. 3]; and a second gate region (8) above the channel region positioned laterally between the drain region (11) and the source region (10) [Fig. 3], wherein the first gate region (7,71,72) underlies the drain region (11) and is offset (horizontally and/or vertically offset) from the source region (10) and at least a portion of the second gate region (8) adjacent to the source region (10) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 18, Koga discloses: wherein the semiconductor layer includes a semiconductor substrate (41/42) [Fig. 3], wherein the method includes forming a buried well region (6) in the semiconductor substrate [Fig. 3], and wherein the forming of the transistor includes forming the transistor above the buried well region (3) [Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 20, Koga discloses wherein the first gate region (7,71,72) has an end (interface between 71 and 72) either below an isolation structure (14) between the drain region (11) and the second gate region (8) or below the second gate region (8) [Fig. 3]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Candra et al. (US 2012/0292669) discloses a first and second gate regions (22/30), and a channel (26) in Figure 1. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE R DIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-1727. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jose R Diaz/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598759
HIGH-DENSITY METAL-INSULATOR-METAL CAPACITOR INTEGRATION WTH NANOSHEET STACK TECHNOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588251
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588226
Integrated Assemblies and Methods Forming Integrated Assemblies
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578645
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581667
MULTISTACK METAL-INSULATOR-METAL (MIM) STRUCTURE USING SPACER FORMATION PROCESS FOR HETEROGENEOUS INTEGRATION WITH DISCRETE CAPACITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 922 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month