Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/365,584

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRICALLY POWERED MOWERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 04, 2023
Examiner
HARCOURT, BRAD
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
DOOSAN BOBCAT NORTH AMERICA, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1178 granted / 1402 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1402 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 12/15/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 9-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/15/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Hasegawa et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0288634). In reference to claim 1, Hasegawa discloses a mower 10 comprising: a main frame 42 that includes a first electronics bay 106 and a second electronics bay 108; a cutting assembly 30 supported by the main frame 42 to cut plant material during operation of the mower 10 (Fig. 2); one or more first power electronic devices 40 housed within the first electronic bay 106 (Fig. 2); and an electrical power source 38 and one or more second power electronic devices (par. 0037, “one or more sensors and electronic control units”; or par. 0088, an inductive coil for charging the power source 38) housed within the second electronics bay 108, wherein a flow path A1-A4 (Fig. 2, par. 0064) for a cooling airflow is defined by the mower 10 to extend from an air inlet 96, through the first electronics bay 106 to the second electronics bay 108, and from the second electronics bay 108 to an air outlet 98 (Fig. 2, par. 0053). In reference to claim 2, Hasegawa discloses that the air inlet 96 provides an upward air flow A1 along the flow path A1-A4 from outside the mower 10 to an interior space of the mower 10 (Fig. 2); and wherein the air outlet 98 provides a downward air flow A3 along the flow path A1-A4 from the second electronics bay 108 to outside the mower 10 (Fig. 2). In reference to claim 3, Hasegawa discloses that the air inlet 96 is disposed on a bottom side of the main frame 42; and wherein the air inlet 96 is separated from the first electronics bay by one or more baffle walls (Fig. 2, the wall separating inlet 96 from chamber 110) to provide the upward air flow (Fig. 2). In reference to claim 4, Hasegawa discloses an outlet fan 94 (par. 0053) supported at a bottom wall (Fig. 2, the wall associated with outlet 142) of the second electronics bay 108 and arranged to direct the downward air flow to be vented away from the mower 10 through the air outlet 98 (Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hasegawa et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0288634) in view of Allen et al. (US Patent No. 3,732,671). In reference to claim 5, Hasegawa discloses that the one or more second power electronic devices include a first charger for the electrical power source 38 (par. 0088); and wherein the outlet fan 94 is located vertically below the power source 38 to direct the downward air flow A3 past the first charger (Fig. 2, par. 0088). Hasegawa fails to disclose that the first charger is arranged to a rear side of the electrical power source. Allen discloses a first charger 98 arranged to a rear side of an electrical power source 94 (Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to dispose a charger at a rear side of an electrical power source with a reasonable expectation of success so that the charger is accessible from the rear of the mower. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sasaki et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0246281) discloses a mower 100 with a flowpath for air extending from an inlet 211 (Fig. 2); and Ullrich et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0059756) discloses a mower 1 with a flowpath for air cooling (par. 0023). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRAD HARCOURT whose telephone number is (571)272-7303. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571)272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRAD HARCOURT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 1/08/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 04, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595792
Magneto-Hydraulic Plunger Pump Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588590
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROP STABILIZATION AND MEASUREMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582034
CROP RESIDUE DISTRIBUTOR ASSEMBLY FOR A COMBINE HARVESTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575501
WINDROW PICKER WITH HOLD-DOWN DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577872
ORIENTING ENERGY TRANSFER MECHANISM CONNECTIONS HIGH SIDE IN A WELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1402 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month