Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/366,988

ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 08, 2023
Examiner
WALKE, AMANDA C
Art Unit
1722
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1488 granted / 1681 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1681 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim15 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 15, line 12, “chamber ;.” Should not include the “;”, and just a period as it is at the end of the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Maeda et al (10,530,012). Maeda et al disclose a method of producing an electrochemical device, wherein the device housing comprises a pouch-type battery casing (instant claim 14), and a wound electrode assembly including a positive and negative electrode, and a separator (abstract). The device further comprises a double-sided tape including a pressure-sensitive adhesive for adhering to the electrode assembly (instant F2) and a surface having a heat-sensitive adhesive for adhering to the pouch-type outer casing (instant F1). The tape fixes the electrode assembly to the outer pouch-type casing and can secure it even when an external force such as a vibration is applied (column 3, lines 53-59). The reference teaches that the double-sided tape includes a substrate, preferably polypropylene (preferred by the instant specification; [0051]), with the heat-sensitive adhesive preferably acrylic, rubber, polyolefin (instant F1; column 4, line 48 to column 5, line 53), and the pressure-sensitive adhesive being rubber, acrylic, and silicone resin (instant F2; column 6, line 25 to column 7, line 39), which are similar materials as taught by the instant specification ([0051]). The reference further teaches that the adhesive force between the tape and the electrode assembly through the pressure-sensitive adhesive (F2) is preferably 10 N/15mm or more to obtain a sufficient adhesive force and prevent peeling, and that the adhesive force between the tape and the outer casing due to the heat-sensitive adhesive layer is preferably 10 N/15 mm or more at a temperature of 40 o C to 80 o C (column 8, lines 20-28; instant claim 4). Examples in Table 1 include peeling strength of the tape and the outer casing (F1) of 10 to 35, and between the tape and the electrode assembly of either the current collector (copper or aluminum) or separator is between 24 and 38 N/15 mm (reference Table 1). These values, when converted from N/ 15mm to N/ m are about 666.7 to 2,334,6 N/m and 1600. 8 to 2534.6 N/m (N/ 15mm x 66.7 = N/m). While the reference prefers at least 10 N/ 15mm, the reference comparative examples include a peel strength of 7 N/ 15 mm (466 N/m), slight outside of the “preferred” range, with capacity retention data similar to that for Ex 5. With the reference not limited to preferred embodiments, and the reference teaching materials similar to those preferred by the instant invention for the press-sensitive adhesive, substrate, and heat-sensitive adhesive, a one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated prior to the effective filing date of the instant invention to prepare a device wherein the double-sided tape had a peel strength falling within the scope of the instantly claimed range. Alternatively, given the teachings of the reference for the materials and rationale provided to achieve sufficient adhesive force, one of ordinary skill in the art would have arrived at the claimed F1 and F2 values through routine experimentation and optimization of the battery mechanical properties for the F1 and F2 values of the instant claims 1 and 3. Each examples includes the peel (adhesive) strength between a copper current collector, an aluminum current collector, and the separator. For example, Ex 1 F1/F2 is 72%, 56%, and 69%, Ex 2 is 64%, 64%, and 75%, Ex 3 is 85%, 88%, and 79%, Ex 4 is well outside of the scope, and Ex 5 is 29%, 29%, and 26%. Only Ex 5 includes all three F1/F2 falling within the claimed ranges, with only a few other materials having data points within the claimed range of 5% to 70%. However, given the teachings of the reference it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant invention to prepare the material of Maeda et al, choosing to prepare the device wherein the material of the pressure-sensitive adhesive (F2) and the heat-sensitive adhesive (F1) each have values with result in F1/F2 falling within the claimed range of 5% to 70%. With respect to the instant claim 2, given the analysis above (see example 5), given the teachings of the reference it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant invention to prepare the material of Maeda et al, choosing to prepare the device wherein the material of the pressure-sensitive adhesive (F2) and the heat-sensitive adhesive (F1) each have values with result in F1/F2 falling within the claimed range of 25% to 55%. With respect to the instant claim 5, a conventional pouch-type cell is rectangular, so a battery wound to fit in the pouch would conventionally have two flat sides, and two bent / rounded sides. The wound battery would include a first and a second bending section, and a first and second section (flat side sections), with the double-sided tape bonded to the outermost portion of one (first section; as in common in the art) to fix the electrode assembly and prevent unwinding (background, column 14, lines 40-61). Each section includes the positive electrode, negative electrode, and separator, and the first section (end) would include the separator, which as shown in the examples given the peel strength for the tape and the separator, is adhered to an end of the separator as required by the instant claim 7. With respect to the instant claims 8 and 9 the double-sides tape (first bonding piece) is adhered to the outermost layers of the wound battery, which could be a length which adheres along the side section and to the bent side section, which would including the ends of the separators and current collectors as required by the instant claims 8-10 (peel strength is provided for the current collectors and separator), and the outermost electrode plate would be present in the first and second sections, and bent/ folded sections as required by the instant claim 11. With respect to the instant claim 6, the first bonding piece has a length of 15mm per examples, which is greater than 5mm as required by the instant claim 6. The cited prior art of record fails to fairly teach or suggest the invention as set forth by the instant claims where additional bonding pieces are present in a first section, or wherein the first bonding piece (tape) is located in a projection of an electrode assembly With respect to the instant claim 12, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to include an additional tape at the first section bonded to the separator and the outermost plate to further fix and seal the electrode assembly and prevent unwinding and movement of the electrode assembly in the pouch casing, wherein according to the instant claim 13, would be covering the tabs/ ends/ protrusions extending from the first section. With respect to the instant claim 15, the reference pouch includes an interior “accommodation chamber” (see specification and drawings, item 101 and 102 [third binding piece]), and wherein one of skill in the art would have arrived at the first bonding piece which affixes the electrode assembly to the housing in any location on the wound body, and would include an additional adhesive piece to further affix the housing to the longer length portion (first section) of the assembly to the housing (wherein the accommodation chamber is the interior portion of the housing/ pouch), through routine experimentation to achieve a battery wherein the electrode assembly is secure and prevent unwinding or movement. Regarding claims 15 and its dependent claims 16 and 17, the F1/F2 values are those are discussed above for instant claims 1-3, therefore the instant claims 15-17 are also taught by the reference. The instant claims 18-20 are also dependent upon the instant independent claim 15, and present limitations are discussed above for the instant claims 4-6, and are also thereby rejected as taught by the prior art of record. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMANDA C WALKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1337. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 5:30am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at 571-272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMANDA C. WALKE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597614
HYBRID ELECTRODES FOR BATTERY CELLS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596306
PHOTOCHEMICAL AND THERMAL RELEASE LAYER PROCESSES AND USES IN DEVICE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597635
ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586855
Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584023
COMPOSITION FOR FORMING ORGANIC FILM, PATTERNING PROCESS, AND COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1681 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month