Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/369,614

ELECTRONIC GAMING SYSTEM EMPLOYING A PLURALITY OF DYNAMIC SIDE DISPLAY PANELS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 18, 2023
Examiner
LIM, SENG HENG
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
627 granted / 949 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 949 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to pending claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LAPALME (US 2019/0102975 A1) in view of Lee (US 2019/0392669 A1). 1. LAPALME discloses an electronic gaming system comprising: a main display including a main screen (200: Fig. 1, 2) and operable for displaying a first set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, the main display having a top, a bottom, and sides [0057]; a plurality of side display panels (220: Fig. 1, 2) arranged vertically and adjacent to and flush with only the sides of the main display such that no side display panels are situated adjacent to and flush with the top and the bottom of the main display [0060], wherein each side display panel of the plurality of side display panels includes a screen and is operable to display: (i) a second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, (ii) a third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, or (iii) the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content and the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content [0088]; and a game controller including a processor and memory storing program code including instructions executable to cause the game controller to (Fig. 7): control display of the first set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content on the main display, and coordinate display of the first set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content on the main display with (i) the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, (ii) the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, or (iii) the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content and the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content on the plurality of side display panels as a visual output [0057], [0088]. LAPALME does not expressly disclose wherein the main screen and side display panels has identical curvature. Lee disclose wherein the main screen and secondary display panels (i.e. ring area 1310) has identical curvature (Fig. 13, 14), [0231]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skilled in the art to modify LAPALME with Lee’s two identical curved displays as it’s a matter of design choice and would yield predictable results. 2. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 1, wherein the visual output is the first set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content synchronized with (i) the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, (ii) the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia contents, or (iii) the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content and the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, LAPALME [0015], [0088]. 3. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 1, further an accessory display framed by one or more accessory side display panels, wherein the instructions are executable to cause the game controller to control display of the visual output on the one or more accessory side display panels, LAPALME , [0061], [0102], [0117]. 4. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 1, further comprising an integrated candle, LAPALME [0102]. 5. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 1, further comprising a light emitting diode (LED) controller configured to synchronize the visual output with the game controller, LAPALME [0087]. 6. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 5, wherein the LED controller is configured to convert the first set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content, or the second set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content and the third set of dynamic graphics or multimedia content to a form that is displayable on the main display and the plurality of side display panels, LAPALME [0088]. 7. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming system of claim 6, wherein the LED controller is further configured to individually control LEDs on the main display and the plurality of side display panels, LAPALME [0087]-[0088]. 8. LAPALME and Lee discloses an electronic gaming machine comprising: a curved main display having a top, a bottom, and sides; a plurality of side display panels adjacent to and flush with only the sides of the curved main display such that no side display panels are situated adjacent to and flush with the top and the bottom of the curved main display; a light emitting diode (LED) controller; and a gaming controller configured to control the LED controller to coordinate a display of multimedia content across the curved main display and the plurality of side display panels based on one or more characteristics of the multimedia content and one or more characteristics of the curved main display and the plurality of side display panels as similarly discussed above. 9. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming machine of claim 8, further comprising a virtual button deck (VBD) and a VBD controller, wherein the gaming controller is further configured to control the VBD controller and the LED controller to synchronize an activation of touch inputs via the virtual button deck with the display of multimedia content across the curved main display and the plurality of side display panels, LAPALME (262, 264, 266, 268: Fig. 1), [0055], [0119] or Lee [0098], [0192], [0253]. 10. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming machine of claim 9, wherein the gaming controller is further configured to control the VBD controller to synchronize output sound to a sound bar with the activation of touch inputs via the virtual button deck and the display of multimedia content across the curved main display and the plurality of side display panels, LAPALME [0112], [0119] or Lee [0098], [0192], [0253]. 11. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming machine of claim 10, wherein the gaming controller is further configured to control the VBD controller and the LED controller to synchronize an activation of touch inputs via the VBD with the display of multimedia content across the curved main display and the plurality of side display panels, LAPALME [0112], [0119] or Lee [0098], [0192], [0253]. 12. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming machine of claim 8, further comprising an accessory display and a plurality of accessory side display panels, LAPALME [0061], [0102], [0117]. 13. LAPALME and Lee discloses the electronic gaming machine of claim 8, wherein the plurality of side display panels includes a first set of LEDs adjacent to the curved main display and a second set of LEDs perpendicular to the curved main display, LAPALME (Fig. 1-3), [0102], [0117]. 14. LAPALME and Lee discloses a method of operating an electronic gaming device comprising: providing dynamic graphics or multimedia content to a controller; determining one or more displays from a main display and one or more side lighting displays to present the dynamic graphics or multimedia content, the main display having a top, a bottom, and sides, the one or more side lighting displays adjacent to and flush with only one or more of the sides of the main display such that no side lighting displays are situated adjacent to and flush with the top and the bottom of the main display; transmitting the dynamic graphics or multimedia content to a light emitting diode (LED) controller; and controlling synchronization of a presentation of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content across the one or more displays by displaying a first portion of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content on the main display and displaying a second portion of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content on the one or more side lighting displays as similarly discussed above. 15. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 14, further comprising coordinating the presentation of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content with an activation of touch inputs at a virtual button deck (VBD), LAPALME [0088], [0093]-[0101]. 16. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 14, further comprising determining to control the main display or the one or more side lighting displays based on one or more characteristics of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content and one or more characteristics of the main display and the one or more side lighting displays, LAPALME [0088], [0093]-[0101]. 17. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 16, wherein the one or more characteristics of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content includes at least one of a format type, a minimum resolution, a minimum display size, or a message type, LAPALME [0088]. 18. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 17, wherein the one or more characteristics of the main display and the one or more side lighting displays includes at least one of a position, a size, or a resolution of the main display and the one or more side lighting displays, LAPALME [0088]. 19. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 14, further comprising coordinating the presentation of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content with sound at a sound bar, LAPALME [0112]. 20. LAPALME and Lee discloses the method of claim 14, further comprising coordinating the presentation of the dynamic graphics or multimedia content with an accessory display, LAPALME [0088], [0102], [0016], [0117]. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see attached USPTO form PTO-892. Filing of New or Amended Claims The examiner has the initial burden of presenting evidence or reasoning to explain why persons skilled in the art would not recognize in the original disclosure a description of the invention defined by the claims. See Wertheim, 541 F.2d at 263, 191 USPQ at 97 (“[T]he PTO has the initial burden of presenting evidence or reasons why persons skilled in the art would not recognize in the disclosure a description of the invention defined by the claims.”). However, when filing an amendment an applicant should show support in the original disclosure for new or amended claims. See MPEP § 714.02 and § 2163.06 (“Applicant should specifically point out the support for any amendments made to the disclosure.”). Please see MPEP 2163 (II) 3. (b) Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SENG H LIM whose telephone number is (571)270-3301. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David L. Lewis can be reached at (571) 272-7673. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Seng H Lim/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 01, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 01, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589296
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR DYNAMICALLY APPLYING EQUALIZER PROFILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569751
Somatosensory Interaction Method and Electronic Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558622
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551804
METHOD FOR PROVIDING INTERACTIVE GAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12548406
GAMING SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING DYNAMIC GAMING INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+28.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 949 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month