Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/372,325

INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE INCLUDING A LATERAL DIFFUSED METAL OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 25, 2023
Priority
Dec 05, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0168131
Examiner
PHAM, LONG
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1509 granted / 1649 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1649 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-3, 6-12, and 15-20 in the reply filed on 2/2/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shibib et al. (US pub 20060038224). With respect to claim 1, Shibib et al. teach an integrated circuit device comprising (see figs. 1-6E, particularly figs. 1 and 2 and associated text): a semiconductor substrate 106,206; a first conductivity type well 104,204 and a second conductivity type well 112,212 formed in the semiconductor substrate; a source region 110,210 formed in the second conductivity type well; a drain region 108,208 formed in the first conductivity type well; a recess insulating layer disposed between the source region and the drain region, and including an upper insulating unit (121 and upper part of 120) and a lower insulating unit (lower part of 120), wherein the upper insulating unit fills an upper substrate recess that extends from an upper surface of the first conductivity type well and into the first conductivity type well, and wherein the lower insulating unit fills a lower substrate recess that extends from a bottom surface of the upper substrate recess and into the first conductivity type well; and a gate electrode layer (GATE, 216, 316) disposed between the source region and the recess insulating layer, and arranged on the first conductivity type well and the second conductivity type well, and wherein the recess insulating layer has a shape in which both sides thereof are asymmetric with respect to a center of the upper insulating unit. With respect to claim 2, Shibib et al. teach in a horizontal direction, the upper insulating unit has a first length, and the lower insulating unit has a second length that is less than the first length. See figs. 1 and 2 and associated text. With respect to claim 6, Shibib et al. teach the semiconductor substrate comprises a fin-type active region 104,204 protruding in a vertical direction, and the gate electrode layer covers an upper surface and side surfaces of the fin-type active region. See figs. 1 and 2 and associated text. With respect to claim 9, Shibib et al. teach a thickness of the lower insulating unit is greater than a thickness of the upper insulating unit. See figs. 1 and 2 and associated text. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shibib et al. (US pub 20060038224). With respect to claim 11, Shibib et al. teach an integrated circuit device comprising (see figs. 1-6E, particularly figs. 1 and 2 and associated text): a semiconductor substrate 106, 206 including a fin-type active region 104 protruding in a vertical direction; a first conductivity type well 104,204 and a second conductivity type well 112, 212 arranged in a first horizontal direction and in a portion of the semiconductor substrate that includes the fin-type active region; a source region 110,210 formed in the second conductivity type well; a drain region 108,208 formed in the first conductivity type well; a recess insulating layer disposed between the source region and the drain region, and including an upper insulating unit (121 and upper part of 120) and a lower insulating unit (lower part of 120), wherein the upper insulating unit extends from an upper surface of the first conductivity type well and into the first conductivity type well, and fills an upper substrate recess having a first length in the first horizontal direction, and wherein the lower insulating unit extends from a bottom surface of the upper substrate recess and into the first conductivity type well, and fills a lower substrate recess having a second length that is less than the first length in the first horizontal direction; and a gate electrode layer (GATE, 216, 316) disposed between the source region and the recess insulating layer, and arranged on the first conductivity type well and the second conductivity type well, wherein the gate electrode layer covers an upper surface and side surfaces of the fin-type active region, wherein the recess insulating layer has a shape in which both sides thereof are asymmetric with respect to a center of the upper insulating unit. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 7-8, 10, and 12-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 18-20 are allowed. Examiner’s Cited References The cited references generally show the similar or related structure having a substrate having a fin type region having a first well having a drain and a second well having a source, and having an isolation region having an upper portion and a lower portion having different lengths and depths between source and drain, having as presently claimed by applicant. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1714. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469-295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LONG . PHAM Examiner Art Unit 2823 /LONG PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 19, 2026
Interview Requested
May 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635524
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635359
ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY PANEL
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628692
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE, SEMICONDUCTOR BONDING STRUCTURE, AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628694
INTEGRATED BARE DIE PACKAGE, AND RELATED FABRICATION METHODS
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622317
PACKAGING ARCHITECTURE FOR MODULAR DIE INTEROPERABILITY
4y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month