Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/384,687

DISPLAY APPARATUS WITH IMPROVED ADHESION CHARACTERISTICS IN NON-ACTIVE AREA

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Oct 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 28, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0141235
Examiner
AU, BAC H
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
684 granted / 845 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
867
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 845 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment dated May 8, 2026, in which claims 1, 12, 17, 18, and 23 were amended, and claims 2 and 16 were cancelled, has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-15, and 17-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1 and 23, the claims recite the limitation "the top surface" in lines 18 and 7, respectively, and the limitation “the side surface” in lines 18 and 8, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. Claims 3-15, 17-22, and 24 are rejected due to their dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Park et al. (U.S. Pub. 2021/0200361) [Hereafter “Park”]. Regarding claim 23 and 24, Park [Figs.1-3] discloses a display apparatus, comprising: a display apparatus, comprising: a display substrate including an active area [DA] configured to display an image and a non-active area [NDA] enclosing the active area; an organic layer [portions of bank 118 between structures 160 and 170; Fig.3] [Paras.73,145] in the non-active area configured to prevent a crack in the display apparatus; and a crack detection unit [171] configured to detect at least one crack in the display apparatus; a cover layer [145] arranged to be in direct contact with (i) a part of the top surface, and (ii) a part of the side surface of the organic layer [portions of bank 118 between structures 160 and 170; Fig.3], wherein the cover layer is formed of an organic material [Para.102]; a light emitting diode [130] in the active area [DA] [Fig.3]; an encapsulation layer [135] on the light emitting diode; and a dam [180] configured to prevent at least a part of the encapsulation layer unit from flowing to the outside of the display substrate in the non-active area [Fig.3]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 23-24 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Overall, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. The rejected claims stand rejected and the Action is made Final. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited prior art is considered analogous art and discloses at least some of the claimed subject matter of the current invention. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAC H AU whose telephone number is (571)272-8795. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BAC H AU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
May 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 08, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751333
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740040
CAPACITORLESS 3D STACKED DRAM DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733560
HYBRID BONDING WITH SELECTIVELY FORMED DIELECTRIC MATERIAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727458
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727467
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 845 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month