Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/387,483

METHOD AND SYSTEM OF DETECTING AND CLASSIFYING AN OBJECT IN REAL-TIME MEDICAL IMAGING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Examiner
FELIX, BRADLEY OBAS
Art Unit
2671
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
L&T Technology Services Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
12%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 12% of cases
12%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 17 resolved
-50.2% vs TC avg
Strong +67% interview lift
Without
With
+66.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
46
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
62.9%
+22.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 17 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3 and 12 recite the limitation “the corresponding input image frame” in pages 2 and 4 respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1, and claim 10 respectively, recites “a corresponding image frame,” but there is no mention of an “input image frame”. It is unclear what the input image frame is referring to. Claim 7 and 16 recite the limitation “the corresponding pre-processed image frames” in pages 3 and 5 respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1, and claim 10 respectively, recites “a pre-processed image frame,” however, there is no mention of a “corresponding pre-processed image frame.” Thus, it is unclear what the “corresponding pre-processed image frame” is corresponding to. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Skin lesion detection based on deep neural networks by Choudhary, Priyta. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Bradley Obas Felix whose telephone number is (703)756-1314. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vincent Rudolph can be reached at 5712728243. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRADLEY O FELIX/Examiner, Art Unit 2671 /VINCENT RUDOLPH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592076
OBJECT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12340540
AN IMAGING SENSOR, AN IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND AN IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 24, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
12%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+66.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 17 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month