Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/389,883

ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Examiner
SECK, AHMED F
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
DENSO CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
63 granted / 94 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
130
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 94 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/13/2024, and 11/12/2024 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kawasaki (JP,62-132660,U1). Claim 1 A rotating electrical machine comprising: a stator (of stator core 1) which is equipped with a stator winding (2); a rotor (of rotor core 3) which is arranged to face the stator (of stator core 1); a housing (provided by frame 8) in which the stator (of stator core 1) and the rotor (of rotor core 3) are disposed; a coolant supply unit (Fig. 4) which is arranged vertically above the stator (of stator core 1) and the rotor (of rotor core 3) in a condition where the rotating electrical machine is mounted in place, the coolant supply unit (Fig. 4) working to deliver liquid coolant into the housing (provided by frame 8); and a coolant guide (7) which serves to direct a flow of the coolant, as delivered from the coolant supply unit (7), into an air gap (gap provided between stator core and rotor core) between the stator (of stator core 1) and the rotor (of rotor core 3). PNG media_image1.png 836 560 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2/1 Claim 2 is allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for Claim 2, Kawasaki teaches the following: The rotating electrical machine as set forth in claim 1, wherein the rotating electrical machine has an outer-rotor (of rotor core 3) structure in which the rotor (of rotor core 3) is located radially outside the stator (of stator core 1) and is used with an axis thereof oriented to extend substantially in a horizontal direction; The prior art fails to teach or fairly suggest, alone or in obvious combination, inter alia: the stator winding has a winding bend defined by an axial end portion thereof which is bent radially outward, the winding bend working as the coolant guide. Claims 4-5, and 7 stand allowed over all prior art based on their virtue of depending on claim 2. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance. Claim 3/1 Claim 3 is allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for Claim 3, Kawasaki teaches the rotating electrical machine as set forth in claim 1. The prior art fails to teach or fairly suggest, alone or in obvious combination, inter alia: wherein the rotating electrical machine has an outer-rotor structure in which the rotor is located radially outside the stator and is used with an axis thereof oriented to extend substantially in a horizontal direction, the stator winding includes multi-phase windings defined by a plurality of winding segments, each of the winding segments includes a pair of intermediate conductive portions and connecting conductive portions which are located at a first axial end and a second axial end of the stator winding, the connecting conductive portions connecting the intermediate conductive portions together in an annular shape, within an interval between the intermediate conductive portions of each of the winding segments for a first phase, a corresponding one of the intermediate conductive portions of each of the winding segments for a second phase, so that the intermediate conductive portions of the multi-phase windings are arranged in a predetermined order in a circumferential direction of the stator winding, at least one of the connecting conductive portions of the winding segments overlapping each other at one of axial ends of the stator winding is bent radially outward to define a winding bend, the winding bend serves as the coolant guide.. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance. Claim 6/1 Claim 6 is allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for Claim 6, Kawasaki teaches the rotating electrical machine as set forth in claim 1. The prior art fails to teach or fairly suggest, alone or in obvious combination, inter alia: wherein the rotating electrical machine has an outer-rotor structure in which the rotor is located radially outside the stator and is used with an axis thereof oriented to extend substantially in a horizontal direction, the stator includes a stator core around which the stator winding is wound, the stator core having an annular wall which is located outside the rotor in an axial direction of the rotor on an axial end portion of the stator core and faces an axial end surface of the rotor, the annular wall serves as the coolant guide. 2. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance. Claim 8/1 Claim 8 is allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for Claim 8, Kawasaki teaches the rotating electrical machine as set forth in claim 1, wherein the coolant supply unit (Fig. 4) includes a coolant path (4) and a coolant outlet (81), the coolant path (4) extending along a wall of the housing (provided by frame 8), the coolant outlet (81) having the coolant, as delivered from the coolant path (4), drop down (as indicated by arrows curving in opposite axial direction than that of the outlet 81); The prior art fails to teach or fairly suggest, alone or in obvious combination, inter alia: the coolant path has a momentum reducer which works to decrease momentum of flow of the coolant. 2. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED F SECK whose telephone number is (571)272-4638. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED F SECK/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /CHRISTOPHER M KOEHLER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603548
POWER TOOL INCLUDING CONFIGURABLE MOTOR STATOR WINDINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603557
ROTOR WITH DIFFERENT SECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592599
STATOR, ELECTRIC MOTOR, COMPRESSOR AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592596
RELUCTANCE ASSISTED AXIAL FLUX ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587062
Electric Motor Positioning Apparatus Including Rubber pot
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+16.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 94 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month