Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/390,713

IMAGE SENSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Examiner
DINKE, BITEW A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 748 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
800
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
65.0%
+25.0% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 748 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-11 and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al. (U.S. 2023/0030489 A1, hereinafter refer to Jang) in view of Yamashita et al. (U.S. 2024/0038815 A1, hereinafter refer to Yamashita). Regarding Claim 1: Jang discloses an image sensor (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown below and ¶ [0002]) comprising: PNG media_image1.png 516 736 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 366 297 media_image2.png Greyscale a first structure and a second structure, each having at least one pixel and sequentially stacked in a vertical direction (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above), each of the pixels (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above) comprising a photodiode portion (PD) in the first structure (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); and a pixel circuit portion (RX, SF, DX, and SX) connected to the photodiode portion (PD) in the first structure (360) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above), the photodiode portion (PD) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above) comprising a photoelectric conversion region (note: the Jang’s PD region is equivalent to the claimed limitation of regions “photodiode portion” and “photoelectric conversion region” because it refers to exactly identical structure) in a first substrate (310) of the first structure (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and ¶ [0035]); a floating diffusion region (FD) spaced apart from the photoelectric conversion region (PD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); a gate (TG) including a transfer channel between the photoelectric conversion region (PD) and the floating diffusion region (FD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); and a device isolation layer (360) surrounding the photoelectric conversion region (PD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above). Jang is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the device isolation layer comprising a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view. Before effective filing date of the claimed invention the disclosed device isolation layer were known to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. For support see Yamashita, which teaches wherein the device isolation layer (110) comprising a first isolation layer (110a2), surrounding the photoelectric conversion region (PD), and a second isolation layer (110a1), having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer (110a2) and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region (FD), when viewed in plan view (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown below and ¶ [0532]). PNG media_image3.png 627 624 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 507 615 media_image4.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jang and Yamashita to enable the Jang device isolation layer to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view as taught by Yamashita in order to isolate each unit pixel in the pixel region in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. Regarding Claim 2: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the first substrate (102) has a first surface and a second surface opposing the first surface, the first isolation layer (110a2) is a deep trench isolation layer penetrating through the first surface and the second surface, and the second isolation layer (110a1) is a shallow trench isolation layer depressed by a depth from the first surface (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above). Regarding Claim 3: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches a ground voltage or a negative voltage is applied to the first isolation layer (110a2) (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above). Note: a claim containing a “recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus” if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Regarding Claim 4: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 2 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches the first isolation layer (110a2) and the second isolation layer (110a1) are stacked in the vertical direction in a region adjacent to the floating diffusion region (FD), and only the first isolation layer (110a2) is in a region other than the region adjacent to the floating diffusion region (FD) (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above). Regarding Claim 5: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein each of the pixels comprises a plurality of transistors (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above), and the photodiode portion comprises a portion of the plurality of transistors, and the pixel circuit portion comprises a remaining portion of the plurality of transistors (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 6: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 5 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the photodiode portion comprises a transfer transistor (TG), and the gate is a transfer gate (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 7: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 6 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the transfer gate (TG) is a vertical transfer gate formed in a recess extending inwardly of the first substrate (310) from the first surface of the first substrate (310) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 8: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 6 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the gate (TR) is a planar transfer gate on the first surface of the substrate with a gate insulating layer interposed therebetween (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above). Regarding Claim 9: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 6 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the pixel circuit portion comprises at least one of a reset transistor, a source follower transistor, a select transistor, or a dual conversion gain transistor (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 10: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein a bonding portion (610) connecting the first structure and the second structure to each other (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and Fig.12C). Regarding Claim 11: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 10 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the bonding portion (610) comprises copper-copper bonding (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above, Fig.12C, and ¶ [0068]). Regarding Claim 14: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 5 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein a third structure stacked to oppose the first structure with the second structure interposed therebetween (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 15: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 14 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the third structure comprises a logic circuit (130) connected to the first structure and the second structure to drive transistors of each of the pixels (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and ¶ [0084]). Regarding Claim 16: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 15 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein at least a portion of the remaining transistors, other than a transfer transistor, is provided in the third structure (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 17: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 14 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein the second structure comprises a second substate (210), a conductive pattern provided on the second substrate (210), and a through-via (510 or 520) penetrating through the second substrate (210), and the first structure and the third structure are connected to each other through the through-via (510 or 520) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and Fig.9). Regarding Claim 18: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 1 as above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita further teaches wherein a ground region provided between the gate (TG) and the device isolation layer (360) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and ¶ [0035]), wherein the ground region (310) includes impurities of a first conductivity type, and the photoelectric conversion region and the floating diffusion region include impurities of a second conductivity type opposite to the first conductivity type (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above and ¶ [0035]). Regarding Claim 19: Jang discloses an image sensor (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above and ¶ [0002]) comprising: a photoelectric conversion region (PD) in a first substrate (310) having a first surface and a second surface (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); a floating diffusion region (FD) in the first substrate (310) to be spaced apart from the photoelectric conversion region (PD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); a gate of a transfer transistor (TG) on a side of the first surface of the first substrate (310) as a transfer channel between the photoelectric conversion region (PD) and the floating diffusion region (FD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above); and a device isolation layer (360) surrounding the photoelectric conversion region (FD) (see Jang, Fig.6 as shown above). Jang is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the device isolation layer comprising a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view. Before effective filing date of the claimed invention the disclosed device isolation layer were known to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. For support see Yamashita, which teaches wherein the device isolation layer (110) comprising a first isolation layer (110a2), surrounding the photoelectric conversion region (PD), and a second isolation layer (110a1), having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer (110a2) and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region (fd), when viewed in plan view (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above and ¶ [0532]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jang and Yamashita to enable the Jang device isolation layer to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view as taught by Yamashita in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. Regarding Claim 20: Jang discloses an image sensor (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above and ¶ [0002]) comprising: a pixel comprising a plurality of transistors (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above), a first structure, a second structure, and a third structure sequentially stacked in vertical direction, the first structure comprising a transfer transistor (TG) among the plurality of transistors, the second structure comprising remaining transistors other than the transfer transistor, and the third structure a logic circuit (130) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above), the first structure comprising a device isolation layer (360) surrounding an active region in a first substrate (310) having the first surface and the second surface (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above); a photoelectric conversion region (PD) in the active region (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above); a floating diffusion region (FD) in the active region and spaced apart from the photoelectric conversion region (PD) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above); and a gate of the transfer transistor (TG) in the active region on a side of the first surface of the first substrate (310) as a transfer channel between the photoelectric conversion region (PD) and the floating diffusion region (FD) (see Jang, Figs.3 and 6 as shown above). Jang is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein the device isolation layer comprising a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer, when viewed in plan view, the first isolation layer and the second isolation layer stacked in a vertical direction in a first region adjacent to the floating diffusion region, and the second isolation layer is in the vertical direction in a region other than the first region. Before effective filing date of the claimed invention the disclosed device isolation layer were known to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer, when viewed in plan view, the first isolation layer and the second isolation layer stacked in a vertical direction in a first region adjacent to the floating diffusion region, and the second isolation layer is in the vertical direction in a region other than the first region in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. For support see Yamashita, which teaches wherein the device isolation layer (110) comprising a first isolation layer (110a2), surrounding the photoelectric conversion region (PD), and a second isolation layer (110a1), having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer (110a2), when viewed in plan view, the first isolation layer (110a2) and the second isolation layer (110a1) stacked in a vertical direction in a first region adjacent to the floating diffusion region (FD), and the second isolation layer (110a1) is in the vertical direction in a region other than the first region (see Yamashita, Figs.51 and 53 as shown above and ¶ [0532]). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jang and Yamashita to enable the Jang device isolation layer to comprise a first isolation layer, surrounding the photoelectric conversion region, and a second isolation layer, having a smaller depth than the first isolation layer and adjacent to only a side of the floating diffusion region, when viewed in plan view as taught by Yamashita in order to electrically and optically isolates the pixels adjacent to each other in a two-dimensional plane. Claim(s) 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al. (U.S. 2023/0030489 A1, hereinafter refer to Jang) and Yamashita et al. (U.S. 2024/0038815 A1, hereinafter refer to Yamashita) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of JIN et al. (U.S. 2022/0406825 A1, hereinafter refer to JIN). Regarding Claim 12: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as applied to claim 1 above. The combination of Jang and Yamashita is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein each of the pixels comprises a first pixel and a second pixel adjacent to each other, and the floating diffusion region is shared by the first pixel and the second pixel. Before effective filing date of the claimed invention the disclosed each of the pixels comprises a first pixel and a second pixel adjacent to each other, and the floating diffusion region is shared by the first pixel and the second pixel in order to obtain an image sensor with increased integration. For support see JIN, which teaches wherein each of the pixels comprises a first pixel and a second pixel adjacent to each other (see JIN, Figs. 2B and 7 as shown below and ¶ [0002]), and the floating diffusion region (CFD) is shared by the first pixel and the second pixel (see JIN, Figs. 2B and 7 as shown below and ¶ [0002]). PNG media_image5.png 494 514 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 498 573 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 452 528 media_image7.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Jang, Yamashita, and JIN to enable each of the pixels of the combination of Jang’s and Yamashita’s to comprises a first pixel and a second pixel adjacent to each other, and the floating diffusion region to be shared by the first pixel and the second pixel as taught by JIN in order to obtain an image sensor with increased integration. Regarding Claim 13: Jang as modified teaches an image sensor as set forth in claim 12 as above. The combination of Jang, Yamashita, and JIN further teaches wherein the first pixel and the second pixel are symmetrically provided with the first isolation layer (PIS), between the first pixel and the second pixel, interposed therebetween (see JIN, Fig.6 as shown above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BITEW A DINKE whose telephone number is (571)272-0534. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571)272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BITEW A DINKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604598
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588484
BACKSIDE DIFFUSION BREAK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575303
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563797
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556275
Display Substrate, Display Apparatus, and Visible Light Communication System
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 748 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month