DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Priority
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on December 20, 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 1 recites the limitation "electrode distinguishing marks" in lines 13-14 of claim 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 1 recites the limitation "vicinities of two adjacent angles of the rectangular outer shape" in lines 14-15 of claim 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claim 1 recites the limitation "two adjacent angles of the rectangular outer shape" in lines 14-15 of claim 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Claims 2-13 are rejected based on their dependency upon rejected claim 1.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 1-13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action.
The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art of Aruga et al (US Pub 2016/0293813) either singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or render obvious a light-emitting device, comprising: a light-emitting element; a base member having a rectangular outer shape in a top view and having a first surface, wherein the light-emitting element is disposed at the first surface, a second surface opposite to the first surface, a lateral wall defining a frame surrounding the first surface in the top view, and an upper surface of the lateral wall; a light-transmissive member disposed over the base member to cover the first surface in the top view; and a bonding member disposed between a lower surface of the light-transmissive member and the upper surface of the lateral wall to bond the base member and the light- transmissive member together, wherein the base member includes a first electrode portion on the second surface, a second electrode portion spaced apart from the first electrode portion, and electrode distinguishing marks respectively provided in vicinities of two adjacent angles of the rectangular outer shape on the upper surface, wherein a portion of the light-transmissive member overlaps with at least a portion of each of the electrode distinguishing marks in the top view, and wherein the bonding member is not disposed at least in the vicinities of the two adjacent angles on the upper surface as recited in claim 1.
Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.”
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY HO whose telephone number is (571)270-1432. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM - 5PM, Monday-Friday.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at 571-272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ANTHONY HO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Prosecution Insights