Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/393,221

MICRO-ELECTRONIC COMPONENT COMBINING POWER DELIVERY AND COOLING FROM THE BACK SIDE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 21, 2023
Examiner
KIM, SU C
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Imec Vzw
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
695 granted / 899 resolved
+9.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -12% lift
Without
With
+-12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
947
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.6%
+17.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 11-14, & 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 is indefinite because an independent claim form is depended on another independent claim (“A method of producing - -“, also, an independent method claim cannot be depended on an independent device claim). Claims 12-14 are indefinite since claim 11 is improperly dependent on claim 1. Claims 3 & 13, reciting “is able to” is indefinite whether the limitations following the phrase are or are not required by the claim. Claim 15 is indefinite because it is an independent claim form and also it is depended on claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 & 11-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chainer (US 20170186728 ). Regarding claim 1, Chainer discloses that a micro-electronic component having a front side and a back side, the component comprising: at the front side of the component 1206-1, a front end of line (FEOL) portion comprising a plurality of semiconductor devices 110 & 108, and, on the FEOL portion, a back end of line (BEOL) portion comprising multiple interconnect levels 118 (Fig. 11 & 12); at the back side of the component, a power delivery network (PDN) comprising multiple interconnect levels 118 (a top and bottom surfaces), and power supply terminals electrically connected to the upper interconnect level (Fig. 11 & 12); and a plurality of via connections 1216 (through-silicon vias as TSVs) for electrically connecting the semiconductor devices 110 & 108 to the power delivery network, wherein the first and a number of subsequent levels of the PDN 108 (para. 0041-0042, note: TSV would require an insulating structure around each TSV) are formed of electrical conductors embedded in a dielectric material, and at least the two upper levels of the PDN 108 & 1216 include electrical conductors which are part of a manifold structure 1226 configured to receive therein a flow of cooling fluid flowing into and out of the manifold structure, in order to remove heat generated by the plurality of semiconductor devices in the FEOL portion (Fig. 11 & 12). Reclaim 2, Chainer discloses that the manifold structure comprises an input port and an output port 1226 configured to direct respective input and output flows in a direction that is oriented essentially perpendicularly to the back to front direction of the component (Fig. 11 & 12, note: from an end to an another end). Reclaim 3, Chainer discloses that the at least two upper levels of the PDN 1216 each comprise an array of parallel line-shaped conductors interconnected by via connections, so that the spacing between each pair of parallel conductors forms a fluid channel 1206-1, the conductors of each pair of adjacent levels are arranged in crosswise fashion, so that a cooling fluid is able to flow from one level to an adjacent level and back, and the manifold structure further comprises guiding elements configured to guide a cooling fluid towards and away from the at least two upper levels of conductors (Fig. 11 & 12, note: at least 3 upper levels of the PDN). Reclaim 4, Chainer discloses that the guiding elements include a floor portion at the same level as at least the lowest level of parallel conductors, a wall portion on the floor portion comprising wall elements which define a flow path for cooling fluid towards and from the conductors of one or more upper levels, and a cover on the wall portion (Fig. 11 & 12) Reclaim 5, Chainer discloses that the input and output ports are at the same level as the upper level of conductors of the manifold structure, and wherein the guiding elements are configured so that a cooling fluid flowing from the inlet port to the outlet port is forced to flow between first selected pairs of upper-level conductors, thereafter downwards between conductors of one or more lower levels and again upwards so as to flow towards the outlet port between second selected pairs of upper-level conductors (Fig. 11 & 12). Reclaim 6, Chainer discloses that the guiding elements are formed of a non-electrically conductive material (dielectric fluid, R1234Zw or R245a refrigerants). Reclaim 7, Chainer discloses that the guiding elements are formed of an electrically conductive material, and wherein an electrically non-conductive material separates the parallel conductors from the guiding elements (para. 0042, conductive fluid such as water). Reclaim 8, Chainer discloses that the contact terminals comprise contact pads on the upper surface of the conductors of the upper level of the manifold structure (Fig. 11 & 12, solder ball requires contact pads). Reclaim 9, Chainer discloses that the guiding elements include a cover, and wherein the cover is provided with openings configured to allow the passage of the contact pads (Fig. 11 & 12) Regarding claim 11, Chainer discloses that a method of producing a component according to claim 1, comprising: producing the front end of line (FEOL) portion on the front side of a semiconductor substrate 1206-1 (Fig. 11 & 12); producing the back end of line (BEOL) portion on the front end of line portion; thereafter, attaching the front side of the substrate to a carrier 1202 (Fig. 11 & 12); thereafter, thinning or removing the substrate from the back side (para. 0073, note chip carrier may include); thereafter, producing a plurality of levels of the back side PDN, the plurality of levels being embedded in a dielectric material (para. 0042), then producing a planar hybrid surface formed of the dielectric material with patches of a conductive material coplanar 108 with the dielectric material (Fig. 11 & 12); and producing the manifold structure 1226 on the planar hybrid surface, wherein the levels of the PDN included in the manifold structure are contacting the patches of conductive material on the hybrid surface (Fig. 11 & 12). Reclaim 12 , Chainer discloses that density of the via connections the manifold structure is produced by one or more 3D printing steps (para. 0073). Reclaim 13, Chainer discloses that the at least two upper levels of the PDN 1206-2 1206-3 each comprise an array of parallel line-shaped conductors, so that the spacing between each pair of parallel conductors forms a fluid channel, wherein the conductors of each pair of adjacent levels are arranged in crosswise fashion, so that a cooling fluid is able to flow from one level to an adjacent level and back, the manifold structure further comprising guiding elements for guiding a cooling fluid towards and away from the at least two upper levels of conductors, and wherein the conductors of the at least two upper levels are produced on the hybrid surface by a first 3D printing step, and at least some of the guiding elements are produced on the hybrid surface by a second 3D printing step (Fig. 11 & 12). Reclaim 14, Chainer discloses that depositing a non-electrically conductive layer 1206 (dielectric fluid is passing through TSVs) on all exposed surfaces of electrical conductors of the PDN which are part of the manifold structure (Fig. 11 & 12). Regarding claim 15, Chainer discloses that stack of interconnected semiconductor chips, wherein the upper chip is a component in accordance with claim 1, and wherein the manifold structure and the power supply terminals are oriented upwards so as to allow the supply of power to the stack via the power supply terminals (Fig. 11 & 12). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chainer (US 20170186728 ). Reclaim 10, Chainer discloses that the electrical conductors of the PDN embedded in a dielectric material include crosswise arranged levels of line-shaped electrical conductors interconnected by via connections wherein the density of the via connections (Fig. 11-12). Chainer fails to specify that the density of the via connections is between 10% and 50%. However, notwithstanding, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to the recited dimensions through routine experimentation and optimization. Before effective filing date of the invention it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use a certain density of the via connections, because it would have been to obtain a certain density of the via connections to achieve better functionality by controlling electro-magnetic with controlling a density of vias. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SU C KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-5972. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571-270-7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SU C KIM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604570
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585001
OPTICAL DETECTION APPARATUS AND OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581776
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE WITH HIGH LUMINOUS EFFICIENCY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581914
OPTICAL METROLOGY WITH NUISANCE FEATURE MITIGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563981
METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-12.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month