Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/396,340

CHIP PACKAGING METHOD AND CHIP PACKAGE BASED ON PANEL FORM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Examiner
LE, THAO P
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
740 granted / 800 resolved
+24.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 800 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/26/23 was filed after the mailing date of the application. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al., U.S.Pub. No. 2021/0104490. Regarding claim 1, Li discloses a chip packaging method comprising: preparing a plurality of chip package units, each of the plurality of chip package units having a panel form and including a plurality of dies 312, 314 (Figs. 2A-2B), sequentially stacking the plurality of chip package units on a substrate, and using a thermal compression bonding process [0003], [0013] to electrically connect the plurality of chip package units to each other and electrically connect the plurality of chip package units and the substrate to each other, to obtain a stack (Figs. 2B-2C), and cutting the stack to form single packages (Figs. 2C-2D). Regarding claim 9, Li discloses a chip packaging method comprising: a plurality of chip package units, each of the plurality of chip package units having a panel form and including a plurality of dies (Figs. 2A-2B), wherein each chip package comprises: a carrier, a plurality of dies on the carrier, an encapsulation layer, of a molding material, on side surfaces of dies, wherein the plurality of chip package units is electrically connected to each other and connected to the substrate by a thermal compression bonding process [0003], [0013], Figs. 2B-2C. Claims 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bhushan et al., U.S. Pub. No. 2023/0048311 (this reference qualifies as a 102(a)(1) until a certified English translation is submitted of the foreign priority application). Regarding claim 14, Bhushan et al. discloses a method of preparing a chip package unit comprising: scribing (line 115) an original wafer to obtain the plurality of dies 110 that correspond to the chip package unit (Fig. 1) [0033], mounting the plurality of dies that correspond to the chip package unit on a carrier [0003], [0033], and using a molding material to encapsulate the plurality of dies that are mounted on the carrier, to obtain an encapsulator, thinning the encapsulator to obtain a preliminary chip package unit, the preliminary chip package unit having the panel form ([0016], removing the excess encapsulating material), and obtaining the chip package unit, the obtaining comprising forming an electrical connection component on the preliminary chip package unit ([0003], [0018], forming interconnects). Regarding claim 15, Bhushan et al. discloses wherein the electrical connection component includes through silicon vias and contact pads (Figs. 2A-2C, 3; [0029], [0034]). Regarding claim 16, Bhushan et al. disclose wherein the carrier includes a non-conductive film or a non-conductive paste as an under-fill material [0025]. Regarding claim 17, Bhushan discloses each of plurality of chip package is configured as a substrate structure formed of the plurality of dies, the molding materials, and the non-conductive film (Fig. 3) and wherein the substrate structure has the panel form (flat form). Regarding claim 18, it is inherent in the art that the substrate can act as barrier layer in the thermal compression bonding process because the substrate has lower thermal conductivity and acts as insulating material. Regarding claim 19, Bhushan discloses wherein thinning the encapsulator comprising partially removing the molding material to expose top surface of the die, remaining portions of the molding material are provided on side surface of each of the dies. Regarding claim 20, Bhushan discloses wherein the thinning of the encapsulator comprises partially removing the molding material such that the molding material remains on top surface of the plurality of dies ([0016], removing the excess encapsulating material, Fig. 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-9, 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al., U.S.Pub. No. 2021/0104490, in view of Bhushan et al., U.S. Pub. No. 2023/0048311. Regarding claim 2, Li fails to disclose: wherein the preparing of the plurality of chip package units comprises, for each chip package unit from among the plurality of chip package units: scribing an original wafer to obtain the plurality of dies that correspond to the chip package unit, mounting the plurality of dies that correspond to the chip package unit on a carrier, and using a molding material to encapsulate the plurality of dies that are mounted on the carrier, to obtain an encapsulator, thinning the encapsulator to obtain a preliminary chip package unit, the preliminary chip package unit having the panel form, and forming an electrical connection component on the preliminary chip package unit. Bhushan et al. discloses: wherein the preparing of the plurality of chip package units comprises, for each chip package unit from among the plurality of chip package units: scribing (line 115) an original wafer to obtain the plurality of dies 110 that correspond to the chip package unit (Fig. 1) [0033], mounting the plurality of dies that correspond to the chip package unit on a carrier [0003], [0033], and using a molding material to encapsulate the plurality of dies that are mounted on the carrier, to obtain an encapsulator, thinning the encapsulator to obtain a preliminary chip package unit, the preliminary chip package unit having the panel form ([0016], removing the excess encapsulating material), and forming an electrical connection component on the preliminary chip package unit ([0003], [0018], forming interconnects). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to apply the method of Bhushan in Li’s in order to protect the die and delicate wire bonds from damage and contaminant, improve durability during handling, shipping, and board assembly, help reduce stress during temperature cycling, prevent short circuits, expose the metal for proper soldering, remove resin covering the contacts, eliminate unwanted material bridging conductor, enable individual package separation, and to provide interconnection links from the die to the outside. Regarding claim 3, Bhushan et al. discloses wherein the electrical connection component includes through silicon vias and contact pads (Figs. 2A-2C, 3; [0029], [0034]). Regarding claim 4, Both Li and Bhushan et al. disclose wherein the carrier includes a non-conductive film or a non-conductive paste as an under-fill material (Li: abstract; Bhushan: [0025]). Regarding claim 5, Bhushan discloses each of plurality of chip package is configured as a substrate structure formed of the plurality of dies, the molding materials, and the non-conductive film (Fig. 3) and wherein the substrate structure has the panel form (flat form). Regarding claim 6, it is well known in the art that the substrate can act as barrier layer in the thermal compression bonding process because the substrate has lower thermal conductivity and acts as insulating material. Regarding claim 7, Bhushan discloses wherein thinning the encapsulator comprising partially removing the molding material to expose top surface of the die, remaining portions of the molding material are provided on side surface of each of the dies. Regarding claim 8, Bhushan discloses wherein the thinning of the encapsulator comprises partially removing the molding material such that the molding material remains on top surface of the plurality of dies ([0016], removing the excess encapsulating material, Fig. 3). Regarding claim 10, Li fails to disclose the dies are configured to be thinned (after undergoing a scribing process, a mounting process, and an encapsulating process – which directs to a method and thus not considered). Bhushan et al. discloses the plurality of chip package units are configured to be thinned [0016]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to thin the package (removing excess unwanted mold) in order to expose the metal for proper soldering, remove molding that covering the contacts, eliminate unwanted material bridging conductor, and enable individual package separation. Regarding claims 11-12, Bhushan et al. discloses wherein the electrical connection component or at least two chip package units includes through silicon vias and contact pads (Figs. 2A-2C, 3; [0029], [0034]). Both Li and Bhushan et al. disclose wherein the carrier includes a non-conductive film or a non-conductive paste as an under-fill material (Li: abstract; Bhushan: [0025]). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al., U.S.Pub. No. 2021/0104490, in view of Chiang et al., U.S. Pub. No. 2023/0035212. Regarding claim 13, Li fails to disclose wherein an uppermost one of the plurality of chip package units does not include a through silicon via. Chiang discloses the uppermost units does not include a through silicon via (Figs. 3 & 8). It has been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to not having through silicon via on the uppermost unit in order to avoid unnecessary TSVs to improve yield and reliability because the top package unit is more exposed and faces encapsulation, therefore adding TSV just to weaken structure and increase risk of mechanical failure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THAO P LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1785. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9AM-6PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Natalini can be reached on 571-272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /THAO P LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604768
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599030
Power Semiconductor Module System and Method for Producing the Power Semiconductor Module System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575380
EVALUATION METHOD FOR SILICON CARBIDE SUBSTRATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568826
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557299
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMORY DEVICES AND FABRICATING METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (-1.3%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month