Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/396,510

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 26, 2023
Priority
Dec 28, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0187101
Examiner
FREY, KIMBERLY NEWMAN
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
17 granted / 22 resolved
+9.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
91
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
85.0%
+45.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 22 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A, Claims 1-10 in the reply filed on 03/17/26 is acknowledged. Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR10-2022-0187101, filed on 12/28/2022. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/10/2024 and 12/26/2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Jang et al. ( US 2023/0282650 A1; hereinafter Jang ) Regarding claim 1, Jang ( ‘650 ) teaches a display device ( Fig. 2 display device 10 ), comprising: a substrate ( SUB1 ) in which a plurality of sub pixels ( Fig. 2 LA1, LA2, and LA3 ) is defined; a light emitting diode ( Fig. 2 light-emitting elements ED ) disposed on the substrate ( Fig. 2: SUB1 ) in each of the plurality of sub pixels ( [0065] In each of the first to third light-emitting areas LA1, LA2 and LA3, light generated by light-emitting elements ED of the display devices 10 exits out of the display devices 10 ); and a planarization layer ( Fig. 2 a first planarization layer OC1 ) which covers the light emitting diode ( Fig. 2: ED ) and includes a first contact hole ( Fig. 2 first contact hole CNT1 ) overlapping the light emitting diode ( [0094] The first planarization layer OC1 may be provided on the first protective layer PV1 to planarize an upper side of the thin film transistor layer TFTL. For example, the first planarization layer OC1 may include a contact hole through which the first electrode RME1passes ), wherein the first contact hole ( Fig. 2: CNT1 ) is formed to have a width which is narrowed from an upper portion of the first contact hole toward a lower portion of the first contact hole ( [0068] a width of a lower portion of the first contact hole CNT1 may be greater than a width of an upper portion of the first contact hole CNT1 ) Regarding claim 2, Jang ( ‘650 ) teaches the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above), further comprising: a pixel electrode ( Fig. 2 first electrode RME1 ) disposed on the light emitting diode ( [0097] The first electrode RME1 may be disposed on the protrusion pattern BP disposed on a side of the light emitting element ED ) in each of the plurality of sub pixels ( Fig. 2 LA1, LA2, and LA3 ), wherein the light emitting diode ( Fig. 2: ED ) disposed in the plurality of the sub pixels ( Fig. 2: LA1, LA2, and LA3 ) is electrically connected to the pixel electrode ( Fig. 2 RME1 ) through the first contact hole ( Fig. 2 CNT1; [0094] the first planarization layer OC1 may include a contact hole through which the first electrode RME1 passes ). Regarding claim 3, Jang ( ‘650 ) teaches the display device according to claim 2( as discussed above ), wherein the pixel electrode ( Fig. 2: RME1 ) and the light emitting diode ( Fig. 2: ED ) are in contact with each other in only a partial area ( as shown in Fig. 2 ) of the first contact hole ( [0094] the first planarization layer OC1 may include a contact hole through which the first electrode RME1 passes ). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 6 are rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Nakajima; US 2018/0090511 A1; 03/2017 Claim 4: Jang ( ‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Jang ( ‘650 ) does not appear to disclose an inner side surface of the first contact hole is formed to have a step shape. However, Nakajima teaches an inner side surface of the first contact hole ( Fig. 15 contact 32 ) is formed to have a step shape ( [0073] the upper portion 32b of the contact 32 is shifted toward the source region 34 side in the X-direction with respect to the lower portion 32a ) . It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Nakajima with Jang to implement an inner side surface of the first contact hole is formed to have a step shape because this approach ensures stable electrical connectivity Claim 6: Jang ( ‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Jang ( ‘650 ) does not appear to disclose the closer to a center of the first contact hole, the deeper a depth of the first contact hole. However, Nakajima teaches the closer to a center ( as shown in Fig. 15 ) of the first contact hole ( Fig. 15 contact hole 32 ), the deeper a depth ( as shown in Fig. 15 ) of the first contact hole ( Fig. 15 #32 ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Nakajima with Jang to implement the closer to a center of the first contact hole, the deeper a depth of the first contact hole because this could be due to manufacturing processes that cause thickness variations, such as spin coating or slit coating techniques. Claim 5 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Jang et al.; US 2023/0057649 A1; 11/2022 Claim 5: Jang ( ‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Jang ( ‘650 ) does not appear to disclose only an upper portion of the light emitting diode is exposed through the first contact hole. However, Jang ( ‘649 ) teaches only an upper portion of the light emitting diode ( [0138] The contact part includes a first contact part 20C to apply the light emitting signal to the first epitaxial stack 20 ) is exposed through the first contact hole ( Fig. 2 #20C). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Jang ( ‘649 ) with Jang ( ‘650 ) to implement only an upper portion of the light emitting diode is exposed through the first contact hole because this approach optimizes electrical contact, prevents short circuits, and aligns with structural isolation layers. Claim 7 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Fujiyoshi; US 2022/0293871 A1; 03/2022 Claim 7: Jang ( ‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 6 ( as discussed above). Jang ( ‘650 ) does not appear to disclose the light emitting diode is exposed at a center of the first contact hole from the planarization layer, and the planarization layer covers the light emitting diode at an outside of the first contact hole. However, Fujiyoshi teaches the light emitting diode ( Fig. 3 light emitting layer 74 ) is exposed at a center of the first contact hole ( [0044] the first through portion 51h and the second through portion 61h function as contact holes ) from the planarization layer ( Fig. 3 first planarization layer 51 ), and the planarization layer ( Fig. 3 #51 ) covers the light emitting diode ( Fig. 3 #74 ) at an outside of the first contact hole ( as shown in Fig. 3 ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Fujiyoshi with Jang ( ‘650 ) to implement the light emitting diode is exposed at a center of the first contact hole from the planarization layer, and the planarization layer covers the light emitting diode at an outside of the first contact hole because this approach will provide electrical interconnection, passivation, and structural stability. Claim 8 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Baek et al.; US 2021/0135166 A1; 11/2020 Claim 8: Jang ( ‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Jang ( ‘650 ) does not appear to disclose in plan view, an area of the first contact hole is larger than an area of the light emitting diode and an area of the light emitting diode exposed through the first contact hole is smaller than the area of the first contact hole. However, Baek teaches in plan view, an area of the first contact hole ( Fig. 11 ; [0144] Further, the insulating film 1140 can include a contact hole spaced apart from the concave portion 1143 ) is larger than an area of the light emitting diode ( Fig. 11: OLED 760 ) and an area of the light emitting diode ( Fig. 11 #760 ) exposed through the first contact hole is smaller than the area of the first contact hole ( as shown in Fig. 11 ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Baek with Jang ( ‘650 ) to implement in plan view, an area of the first contact hole is larger than an area of the light emitting diode and an area of the light emitting diode exposed through the first contact hole is smaller than the area of the first contact hole because this will improve electrical connection and reliability. Claim 9 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Baek et al.; US 2021/0135166 A1; 11/2020 as it related to claim 8 and further in view of Park; US 2020/0395388 A1; 09/2020 Claim 9: Jang ( ‘650 ) and Baek disclose the display device according to claim 8 ( as discussed above ). Neither Jang ( ‘650 ) nor Baek appear to disclose in plan view, an area of the light emitting diode exposed through the first contact hole is smaller than an overall area of the light emitting diode. However, Park teaches in plan view, an area of the light emitting diode ( Fig. 5 light emitting element 150 ) exposed through the first contact hole ( Fig. 5 first electrode contact hole ECH1 ) is smaller than an overall area ( as shown in Fig. 5 ) of the light emitting diode ( Fig. 5 #150 ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Park with Jang ( ‘650 ) and Baek to implement in plan view, an area of the light emitting diode exposed through the first contact hole is smaller than an overall area of the light emitting diode because this enhances efficiency, increases structural stability, and improves manufacturing yield. Claim 10 is rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al.; US 2023/0282650 A1; 10/2022 in view of Park; US 2020/0395388 A1; 09/2020 Claim 10: Jang (‘650 ) discloses the display device according to claim 1 ( as discussed above ). Jang (‘650 ) does not appear to disclose a center of the first contact hole corresponds to a center of the light emitting diode. However, Park teaches a center of the first contact hole ( Fig. 5: ECH1 ) corresponds to a center ( as shown ins Fig. 5 ) of the light emitting diode ( Fig. 5 #150 ). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to utilize the teachings of Park with Jang ( ‘650 ) and Baek to implement a center of the first contact hole corresponds to a center of the light emitting diode because this ensures uniform light emission, optimal electrical connection, and accurate assembly. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY N FREY whose telephone number is (571)272-5068. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at (571)272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.N.F./Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /MARLON T FLETCHER/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2023
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661007
INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE SENSOR
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651713
THIN FILM CAPACITOR AND ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT SUBSTRATE HAVING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641965
DISPLAY PANEL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12610787
DESIGN FOR ASYMMETRIC PADS STRUCTURE AND TEST ELEMENT GROUP MODULE
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12578441
SENSING DEVICE AND DISTANCE MEASURING APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 4m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 22 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month