Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/397,904

LIFT ASSEMBLY FOR ELECTRIFIED REFUSE VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 27, 2023
Examiner
SNELTING, JONATHAN D
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Oshkosh Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
587 granted / 855 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
873
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 855 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 18 recites “the sides” which lacks proper antecedent basis in the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 6, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dodds et al. (US 2017/0341860 A1), hereafter referred to as Dodds. Consider claims 1 and 6. Dodds teaches an electrified refuse vehicle comprising: a chassis (12); a cab (16) coupled to the chassis; a body (14) coupled to the chassis; an on-vehicle electrical power source (see paragraph [0020], lines 23-32); and a lift assembly (40) coupled to the body and extending in front of the cab, the lift assembly including: a first lift arm (one 42); a second lift arm (other 42); and two lift actuators (46) powered by the on-vehicle electrical power source, the two lift actuators coupled to the lift arms and positioned to pivot the lift arms (see fig. 1 and paragraph [0022], lines 9-12). Dodds does not explicitly teach that the lift actuators are electric lift actuators. Dodds teaches that pneumatic actuators, hydraulic actuators, and electric actuators are interchangeable (see paragraph [0025], lines 9-10). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the lift actuators of Dodds to be electric lift actuators in order to reduce moving parts to improve serviceability and reliability. Consider claim 2. Dodds teaches a controller (510) configured to at least one of (a) perform a loadsense function to determine a weight of a refuse container being lifted by or coupled to the lift assembly or (b) perform an object impact detection function (via accelerometer; see paragraph [0030], lines 1-3) to determine that a component or portion of the lift assembly has encountered or run into an object based on a signal acquired from the one or more electric lift actuators. Consider claim 16. Dodds teaches an electrified refuse vehicle comprising: a chassis (12); a cab (16) coupled to the chassis; a body (14) coupled to the chassis; a battery pack (see paragraph [0020], lines 23-32); and a lift assembly (40) coupled to the body and extending in front of the cab, the lift assembly including: a first lift arm (one 42); a second lift arm (other 42); a first lift actuator (one 46) powered by the battery pack, the first lift actuator coupled to the body and the first lift arm; and a second lift actuator (other 46) powered by the battery pack, the second electric lift actuator coupled to the body and the second lift arm. Dodds does not explicitly teach that the lift actuators are electric lift actuators. Dodds teaches that pneumatic actuators, hydraulic actuators, and electric actuators are interchangeable (see paragraph [0025], lines 9-10). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the lift actuators of Dodds to be electric lift actuators in order to reduce moving parts to improve serviceability and reliability. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 7-15, and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 19 and 20 are allowable. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN D SNELTING whose telephone number is (571)270-7015. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00-4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571)272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN SNELTING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595125
AUTOMATED WAREHOUSE SYSTEM AND RETREAT MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595122
Powered industrial truck
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598947
SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583671
REFUSE TRUCK WITH HELICAL PUMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577090
CONTAINER LIFTING DEVICES AND METHODS FOR LIFTING CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 855 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month