Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/399,030

CHIP PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 28, 2023
Examiner
WONG, TINA MEI SENG
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shanghai Xizhi Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
909 granted / 1078 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1123
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.7%
+22.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1078 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Application Publication 2022/0113483 to Kalman et al. In regards to claims 1, 11 and 20 , Kalman recites a chip package/manufacturing method (Figure 3A), comprising: an interposer (313); a plurality of semiconductor chips (first 311a & second 311b) optically connected to the interposer, wherein the plurality of semiconductor chips comprises at least four [0036] said semiconductor chips; and an optical interconnect chip (325 layer) connected to the interposer; wherein each of the plurality (first and second) of semiconductor chips is configured to be optically connected to the optical interconnect chip via the interposer, to realize optical signal communication between any two of the plurality of semiconductor chips. Although Kalman does not expressly recite the optical interconnect chip to be optically connected to the interposer, Kalman does recite an optical chip to chip interconnects [0010], the integrated circuit chips having optical components and being semiconductor chips [0011, 0015, 0036, 0039]. Since Kalman teaches optical semiconductor chips and optical chip to chip interconnectors, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have provided a completely optical system since pure optical systems offer a larger bandwidth and speed and do not require the conversion between electrical and optical signals. In regards to claims 2 and 12, modified Kalman recite the interposer is configured to carry the plurality of semiconductor chips and the optical interconnect chip. [0036, 0039] In regards to claims 3 and 13, modified Kalman does not expressly recite the interposer comprises a plurality of first waveguides, each of the plurality of semiconductor chips comprises a second waveguide optically connected to a corresponding one of the first waveguides, and the optical interconnect chip comprises a plurality of third waveguides each optically connected to two of the first waveguides, wherein the plurality of semiconductor chips comprises a first semiconductor chip and a second semiconductor chip, the second waveguide of the first semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the first semiconductor chip, the second waveguide of the second semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the second semiconductor chip, and the first waveguide corresponding to the first semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the second semiconductor chip through one of the plurality third waveguides. However, placing a waveguide in order to transmit an optical signal in the modified optical chip package in place of conversion circuitry, such as 317 and 323, would have been an obvious matter of common skill and design choice in a modified optical chip package since optical waveguides are well known components in the optical art for transmitting optical signals. In regards to claims 4-6 and 14-16, modified Kalman recites the second waveguide is optically connected to the corresponding one of the first waveguides, and the third waveguides (325) are optically connected to the first waveguides, the plurality of semiconductor chips is optically connected to the interposer and the optical interconnect chip is optically connected to the interposer. Although Kalman does not expressly recite coupling through at least one of evanescent coupling and grating coupler coupling, Kalman does recite coupling though light collection optics. Grating couplers and evanescent couplings are examples of light collection optics that provide the advantage of manipulating light and coupling light in a pure optical device. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have provided coupling through at least one of evanescent coupling and grating coupler coupling. In regards to claims 7 and 17, modified Kalman recites the interposer comprises at least one of a semiconductor substrate, a glass substrate, or a ceramic substrate. [0042] In regards to claims 8 and 18, modified Kalman recites the first waveguides of the interposer comprise at least one of polymer waveguides, glass waveguides, silicon waveguides, or silicon nitride waveguides. In regards to claims 9, 10 and 19, modified Kalman recites the plurality of third waveguides are arranged in at least two layers, wherein: the at least two layers comprise a first layer and a second layer; the plurality of semiconductor chips further comprises a third semiconductor chip [0036] and a fourth semiconductor chip [0036]; the second waveguide of the third semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the third semiconductor chip, the second waveguide of the fourth semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the fourth semiconductor chip, the first waveguide corresponding to the third semiconductor chip is optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the fourth semiconductor chip through one of the plurality third waveguides, the third waveguide optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the first semiconductor chip and the first waveguide corresponding to the second semiconductor chip is in the first layer, and the third waveguide optically connected to the first waveguide corresponding to the third semiconductor chip and the first waveguide corresponding to the fourth semiconductor chip is in the second layer. References Cited The references cited made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TINA M WONG whose telephone number is (571)272-2352. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at (571) 272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TINA WONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601874
MANAGING TEMPERATURES IN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601886
PANEL SYSTEM WITH MANAGED CONNECTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591139
CURVED LIGHTGUIDE IN A SEE-THROUGH SHELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571975
PHOTOELECTRIC HYBRID DEVICE BASED ON GLASS WAVEGUIDE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560762
REFLECTORS FOR A PHOTONICS CHIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1078 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month