Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/402,895

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 03, 2024
Examiner
DINH, TUAN T
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Magnolia White Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
916 granted / 1165 resolved
+10.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1165 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Abstract Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano et al. (WO 2021/131265A1 same as Sano 2022/0320259) in view of Kimura et al. (U.S. Patent 7,710,739). As to claim 1, Sano discloses an electronic device (AS, figure 1, para-0030) as shown in figures 1-6 comprising: a base material (flexible substrate 100 or insulating base material 4, para-0030, 0032) that has a meander structural part (Aa, Ad, and Aa, Af, para-0033+) and an element area part (Aa); a wiring (1 or 2, para-0032+) that is positioned at the meander structural part; and an element (3, para-0032+) that is positioned at the element area part (Aa) and connected to the wiring (1, 2), wherein the electronic device (AS) has an active area (Aa, the area where the electrical elements 3 located) and a terminal area (Ab), in the active area, a plurality of element area parts (3) is provided, and the meander structural part (1, 2) is formed so as to connect the element area parts (3) to each other, a plurality of terminals (p1 or TL) aligned in a first direction is formed in the terminal area (Ab). Sano does not specifically disclose the base material (4) has a connecting part in the terminal area, the plurality of terminals is positioned at the connecting part, and the connecting part is continuously formed in the first direction. Kimura teaches a semiconductor device and display device as shown in figures 34 and 36 comprising base material (a substrate 101) has a connecting part (3601) in the terminal area (see figure 36, connection terminal portion), the plurality of terminals (113a, 113b) is positioned at the connecting part (3601), and the connecting part is continuously formed in the first direction. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Kimura employed in the device of Sano in order to provide a bridge structure to reduce power consumption. Regarding claim 2, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the width of the connecting part (3601) in a second direction (vertical or y direction) intersecting the first direction (horizontal or x direction) is (approximately) the same as that of the terminal (113) in the second direction. Regarding claim 3, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the width of the connecting part (3601) in a second direction intersecting the first direction is smaller than that of the terminal (113) in the second direction. Regarding claim 4, Sano as modified by Kimura discloses the base material (4) is formed of polyimide (figure 2). Regarding claim 5, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches in figures 39A-39B, the connecting part (the element 3903 is made from insulating film) has an insulating layer positioned between the plurality of terminals (3901a-3901b), and the insulating layer is formed of a material different from the base material (101). Regarding claim 6, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches in figure 39B that the thickness of the insulating layer (3903) is smaller than that of the base material (101). Regarding claim 7, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches a Young's modulus of the insulating layer (transparent conductive film or ITO) is larger than that of the base material (polyimide). Regarding claim 8, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the width of the insulating layer (3903) in a second direction (vertical) intersecting the first direction (horizontal) is the same as that of each of the plurality of terminals (3901a, 3901b) in the second direction. Regarding claim 9, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the plurality of terminals (113a, 113b) has a first line aligned in the first direction and a second line separated in a second direction intersecting the first line and the first direction. As to claim 10, Sano discloses an electronic device (AS) in which an active area (Aa) and a terminal area (Ab) are continuously formed, the device (AS) as shown in figure 1 comprising: a base material (flexible substrate 100 or insulating base material 4) that has a meander structural part (Aa, Ad, and Aa, Af) and an element area part (Aa); a wiring (1 or 2) that is positioned at the meander structural part; and an element (3) that is positioned at the element area part (Aa) and connected to the wiring (1, 2), wherein in the active area (Aa), a plurality of element area parts is provided, and the meander structural part (Aa, Ab, and Aa, Af) is formed so as to connect the element area parts to each other, see figure 2, a plurality of terminals (p1, or TL) aligned in a first direction is formed in the terminal area (Ab), the plurality of terminals (p1 or TL) is formed on one surface of the base material (100 or 4), on the other surface of the base material, except for a connecting part is formed in parts corresponding to the plurality of terminals, and the connecting part is formed of a material having a Young's modulus larger than the base material. Kimura teaches a semiconductor device and display device as shown in figures 34 and 36 comprising base material (a substrate 101) has a connecting part (3601) corresponding to the terminal area (see figure 36, connection terminal portion), and the connecting part (3601 made from metal) is formed of a material having a Young's modulus larger than the base material (the polyimide). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date to have a teaching of Kimura employed in the device of Sano in order to provide a bridge structure to reduce power consumption. Regarding claim 11, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches in figure 39B the thickness of the connecting part (3903) is smaller than that of the base material (101). Regarding claim 12, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches in figure 36 the width of the connecting part (3601) in a second direction intersecting the first direction is the same as that of each of the plurality of terminals (113a, 113b). Regarding claim 13, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the connecting part (3601) is metal (same material f the electrode 113). Regarding claims 14-15, Sano as modified by Kimura teaches the connecting part is indium tin oxide (ITO), or an inorganic insulating film (transparent conductive film). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN T DINH whose telephone number is (571)272-1929. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 8AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN T DINH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598704
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POWER MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581591
POWER REGULATOR INTERFACES FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581599
PACKAGING MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581743
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571469
CONTROL MODULE OF A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1165 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month