Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/406,831

FLEXIBLE CABLE TIE, ELECTRICAL CONNECTION STRUCTURE AND BATTERY

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Jan 05, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022070303
Examiner
CULLEN, SEAN P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
865 granted / 1251 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
1279
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1251 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims and Other Notes Claims 1–17 are pending. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The paragraph numbers cited in this Office Action in reference to the instant application are referring to the paragraph numbering of the PG-Pub of the instant application. See US 2024/0182217 A1. Drawings Applicants' amendments have overcome the objections to the drawings. Specification Applicants' amendments have overcome the objections to the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1–17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the length direction" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2–12 are directly or indirectly dependent from claim 1 and include all the limitations of claim 1. Therefore, claims 2–12 are also indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation "wherein in the direction perpendicular to the cable tie body." A cable tie body is a three-dimensional object with an unknown number of surfaces or cross sections that can be chosen to have a direction to be perpendicular to. It is unclear what encompasses "the direction perpendicular to the cable tie body." Claim 14 recites the limitation “the cable tie according to any one of claims 1 to 13” and may include all the limitations of claim 1 and claim 13. Therefore, claim 14 is also indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 15 and 16 are directly dependent from claim 14 and include all the limitations of claim 14. Therefore, claims 15 and 16 are also indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites the limitation “the electrical connection structure according to claim 14” and includes all the limitation of claim 14. Therefore, claim 17 is also indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1–5, 7, 8, and 10–13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hu et al. (CN 207001248 U, hereinafter Hu). Regarding claim 1, Hu discloses a cable tie (FIG. 1, [0018]), comprising: a cable tie body (1, 2; [0018]), wherein the cable tie body (1, 2) is provided with a plurality of first locking teeth (9) arranged in the length direction (FIG. 1, [0019]) of the cable tie body (1, 2); and a first snapping portion (3) and a second snapping portion (4), which are two snapping portions (3, 4) and arranged at a first end (1) of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 1, [0018]), wherein the first snapping portion (3) is provided with a first snapping hole (10, [0019]), the second snapping portion (4) is provided with a second snapping hole (11, [0019]), and the first snapping hole (10) is internally provided with a second locking tooth (12), the second snapping hole (11) is internally provided with a third locking tooth (12), and the cable tie body (1, 2) has an unfolded state and a wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (1, 2) in the unfolded state (FIG. 1, [0018]); and a second end (2) of the cable tie body (1, 2) is connected to the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) in the wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and both the second locking tooth (12) and the third locking tooth (12) are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole (10) and the second snapping hole (11), respectively (FIG. 2, [0018]). Regarding claim 2, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the plurality of first locking teeth (9) are in snap-fit with the first snapping portion (3) through the first snapping hole (10) and in snap-fit with the second snapping portion (4) through the second snapping hole (11, [0020]). Regarding claim 3, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the plurality of first locking teeth (9) are arranged on a side surface of the cable tie body (1, 2; FIG. 1, [0019]), the side surface is provided with the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4, [0019]). Regarding claim 4, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a cross section of the cable tie body (1, 2) is in an arc shape in a width direction of the cable tie body (FIG. 1, [0019]), and the first snapping portion (3), the second snapping portion (4) and the first locking teeth (9) are all arranged on a concave side of the cable tie body (FIG. 1, [0019]). Regarding claim 5, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the second locking tooth (12) IS matched with the first locking teeth (9, [0019]); and/or, the third locking tooth (12) is matched with the first locking teeth (9, [0019]). Regarding claim 7, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a width of the first locking tooth (9) is greater than a width of the second locking tooth (12) in a width direction of the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0019]); and/or, the width of the first locking tooth (9) is greater than the width of the third locking tooth (12) in the width direction of the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0019]). Regarding claim 8, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a portion, opposite to the second locking tooth (12), of the first snapping hole (3) is in an arc shape (FIG. 1, [0019]); and/or, a portion, opposite to the third locking tooth (12), of the second snapping hole (4) is in an arc shape (FIG. 1, [0019]). Regarding claim 10, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the first snapping portion (3) is arranged at a position closer to the first end (1) of the cable tie body than to the second end of the cable tie body (FIG. 1, [0018]), and the second snapping portion (4) is arranged between the first snapping portion (3) and the first locking teeth (9, [0018]). Regarding claim 11, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a width of the second snapping hole (11) is smaller than a width of the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0019]). Regarding claim 12, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a width of the first snapping hole (10) is greater than or equal to a width of the second snapping hole (11, [0019]), and two sides of the cable tie body are attached to a side wall of the first snapping hole (10) respectively (FIG. 1 [0019]). Regarding claim 13, Hu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a distance between a top wall of the first snapping hole (10) and a top surface of the first snapping portion (3) is smaller than a distance between a top wall of the second snapping hole (11) and a top surface of the second snapping portion (4) in the direction perpendicular to the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0019]). Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ando (JP 2007-089364 A). Regarding claim 1, Ando discloses a cable tie (1, [0012]), comprising: a cable tie body (10, 20; [0012]), wherein the cable tie body (10, 20) is provided with a plurality of first locking teeth (120) arranged in the length direction of the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0012]); and a first snapping portion (13) and a second snapping portion (12), which are two snapping portions and arranged at a first end (10) of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 1, [0012]), wherein the first snapping portion (13) is provided with a first snapping hole (13b, [0016]), the second snapping portion (12) is provided with a second snapping hole (12a, [0015]), and the first snapping hole (13b) is internally provided with a second locking tooth (162, [0016]), the second snapping hole (12a) is internally provided with a third locking tooth (152, [0016]), and the cable tie body (10, 20) has an unfolded state (FIG. 1, [0012]) and a wrapping state (FIG. 3, [0012]), and the first snapping portion (13) and the second snapping portion (12) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (10, 20) in the unfolded state (FIG. 1, [0012]); and a second end (20) of the cable tie body (10, 20) is connected to the first snapping portion (13) and the second snapping portion (12) in the wrapping state (FIG. 3, [0012]), and both the second locking tooth (162) and the third locking tooth (152) are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole (13b) and the second snapping hole (12a), respectively (FIG. 3, [0012]). Regarding claim 2, Ando discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the plurality of first locking teeth (120) are in snap-fit with the first snapping portion (13) through the first snapping hole (13b, [0016]) and in snap-fit with the second snapping portion (12) through the second snapping hole (12a, [0015]). Regarding claim 5, Ando discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein the second locking tooth (162) is matched with the first locking teeth (120, [0016]); and/or, the third locking tooth (152) is matched with the first locking teeth (120, [0015]). Regarding claim 6, Ando discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a height of the first locking tooth (120) is greater than a distance between a top of the second locking tooth (162) in the first snapping hole (13b) and a top wall of the first snapping hole (13b) in a direction perpendicular to the length direction of the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0014]); and/or, a height of the first locking tooth (120) is greater than a distance between the top of the third locking tooth (152) in the second snapping hole (12a) and a top wall of the second snapping hole (12a) in a direction perpendicular to the cable tie body (FIG. 2, [0014]). Regarding claim 9, Ando discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a cable tie: wherein a side surface of the first locking tooth (120) is in a right triangle shape (FIG. 2, [0012]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 14–17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu (DE 102006035100 A1) in view of Hu (CN 207001248 U). Regarding claim 14, Wu discloses an electrical connection structure (FIG. 13, [0033]) comprising: a first connecting element (54), comprising a first connecting portion (54) and a second connecting portion (54, [0026]); a second connecting element (52), comprising a third connecting portion (52) and a fourth connecting portion (52, [0027]); a first connecting structure (53), through which the first connecting portion (54) and the third connecting portion (52) are electrically connected (FIG. 8, [0025]); a second connecting structure (53), through which the second connecting portion (54) and the fourth connecting portion (52) are electrically connected (FIG. 8, [0025]), wherein the first connecting structure (53) and the second connecting structure (53) are located on two sides of a second snapping portion (63a) respectively (FIG. 13, [0033]); and a cable tie (60c) comprising a cable tie body (61a); and a first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a), which are arranged at a first end of the cable tie body (61a) and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 12. [0033]), wherein the cable tie body (61a) has an unfolded state (FIG. 12, [0033]) and a wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]), and the first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (61a) in the unfolded state (FIG. 12, [0033]); and a second end of the cable tie body (61a) is connected to the first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a) in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]); wherein the first connecting structure (53) is caused to be located among the first snapping portion (63a), the second snapping portion (63a) and the cable tie body (61a) when the cable tie body (61a) is in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]), and the second connecting structure (53) is caused to be located between the second snapping portion (63a) and the cable tie body (61a) when the cable tie body (61a) is in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]). Wu does not explicitly disclose a cable tie comprising: a first snapping portion and a second snapping portion, which are two snapping portions and arranged at a first end of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance, wherein the first snapping portion is provided with a first snapping hole, the second snapping portion is provided with a second snapping hole, and the first snapping hole is internally provided with a second locking tooth, the second snapping hole is internally provided with a third locking tooth, and both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively. Hu discloses a cable tie (FIG. 1, [0018]), comprising a cable tie body (1, 2; [0018]), wherein the cable tie body (1, 2) is provided with a plurality of first locking teeth (9) arranged in the length direction (FIG. 1, [0019]) of the cable tie body (1, 2); and a first snapping portion (3) and a second snapping portion (4), which are two snapping portions (3, 4) and arranged at a first end (1) of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 1, [0018]), wherein the first snapping portion (3) is provided with a first snapping hole (10, [0019]), the second snapping portion (4) is provided with a second snapping hole (11, [0019]), and the first snapping hole (10) is internally provided with a second locking tooth (12), the second snapping hole (11) is internally provided with a third locking tooth (12), and the cable tie body (1, 2) has an unfolded state and a wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (1, 2) in the unfolded state (FIG. 1, [0018]); and a second end (2) of the cable tie body (1, 2) is connected to the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) in the wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and both the second locking tooth (12) and the third locking tooth (12) are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole (10) and the second snapping hole (11), respectively (FIG. 2, [0018]) to improve the binding effect of the cable tie (see binding, [0011]). Wu and Hu are analogous because they are directed to cable ties. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the electrical connection structure of Wu with the cable tie of Hu in order to improve the binding effect of the cable tie. Regarding claim 15, modified Wu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrical connection structure, further comprising: a first fixing element (44) and a second fixing element (44, [0032]), wherein the first fixing element (44) is used to fix the first connecting structure (53) to the cable tie body (61a, [0032]), and the second fixing element (44) is used to fix the second connecting structure (53) to the cable tie body (61a, [0032]). Regarding claim 16, modified Wu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrical connection structure: wherein the cable tie body (61a) is provided with a first connecting hole (64a) and a second connecting hole (64a, [0033]), the first connecting hole (64a) is arranged between the first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a, [0033]), the second connecting hole (64a) is arranged on the side, away from the first snapping portion (63a), of the second snapping portion (63a, [0033]), the first fixing element (44) penetrates through the first connecting structure (53) and the first connecting hole (64a) so as to connect the first connecting portion (54), the third connecting portion (52) and the cable tie body (61a, [0033]), and the second fixing element (44) penetrates through the second connecting structure (63a) and the second connecting hole (64a) so as to connect the second connecting portion (54), the fourth connecting portion (62) and the cable tie body (61a, [0033]). Regarding claim 17, Wu discloses a battery (FIG. 8, [0021]) comprising a case (20) internally provided with an accommodating cavity (FIG. 8, [0021]), wherein a side wall (22) of the case (20) is provided with a first through hole (221) communicating with the accommodating cavity (FIG. 8, [0022]); a battery body (40) arranged in the accommodating cavity (FIG. 8, [0021]); and an electrical connection structure (FIG. 13, [0033]) comprising: a first connecting element (54), comprising a first connecting portion (54) and a second connecting portion (54, [0026]); a second connecting element (52), comprising a third connecting portion (52) and a fourth connecting portion (52, [0027]); a first connecting structure (53), through which the first connecting portion (54) and the third connecting portion (52) are electrically connected (FIG. 8, [0025]); a second connecting structure (53), through which the second connecting portion (54) and the fourth connecting portion (52) are electrically connected (FIG. 8, [0025]), wherein the first connecting structure (53) and the second connecting structure (53) are located on two sides of a second snapping portion (63a) respectively (FIG. 13, [0033]); and a cable tie (60c) comprising a cable tie body (61a); and a first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a), which are arranged at a first end of the cable tie body (61a) and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 12. [0033]), wherein the cable tie body (61a) has an unfolded state (FIG. 12, [0033]) and a wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]), and the first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (61a) in the unfolded state (FIG. 12, [0033]); and a second end of the cable tie body (61a) is connected to the first snapping portion (63a) and the second snapping portion (63a) in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]); wherein the first connecting structure (53) is caused to be located among the first snapping portion (63a), the second snapping portion (63a) and the cable tie body (61a) when the cable tie body (61a) is in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]), and the second connecting structure (53) is caused to be located between the second snapping portion (63a) and the cable tie body (61a) when the cable tie body (61a) is in the wrapping state (FIG. 13, [0033]); and wherein the first connecting element (54) is electrically connected to the battery body (40, [0030]), the second connecting element (52) is arranged outside the case (20, [0027]), and the third connecting portion (52) and the fourth connecting portion (52) penetrate through the first through hole (221) to be connected to the first connecting element (54, [0027]), and the electrical connection structure (FIG. 13, [0033]) is arranged in the accommodating cavity (FIG. 8, [0033]). Wu does not explicitly disclose a cable tie comprising: a first snapping portion and a second snapping portion, which are two snapping portions and arranged at a first end of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance, wherein the first snapping portion is provided with a first snapping hole, the second snapping portion is provided with a second snapping hole, and the first snapping hole is internally provided with a second locking tooth, the second snapping hole is internally provided with a third locking tooth, and both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively. Hu discloses a cable tie (FIG. 1, [0018]), comprising a cable tie body (1, 2; [0018]), wherein the cable tie body (1, 2) is provided with a plurality of first locking teeth (9) arranged in the length direction (FIG. 1, [0019]) of the cable tie body (1, 2); and a first snapping portion (3) and a second snapping portion (4), which are two snapping portions (3, 4) and arranged at a first end (1) of the cable tie body and spaced by a preset distance (FIG. 1, [0018]), wherein the first snapping portion (3) is provided with a first snapping hole (10, [0019]), the second snapping portion (4) is provided with a second snapping hole (11, [0019]), and the first snapping hole (10) is internally provided with a second locking tooth (12), the second snapping hole (11) is internally provided with a third locking tooth (12), and the cable tie body (1, 2) has an unfolded state and a wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) are arranged on the same side of the cable tie body (1, 2) in the unfolded state (FIG. 1, [0018]); and a second end (2) of the cable tie body (1, 2) is connected to the first snapping portion (3) and the second snapping portion (4) in the wrapping state (FIG. 1, [0020]), and both the second locking tooth (12) and the third locking tooth (12) are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole (10) and the second snapping hole (11), respectively (FIG. 2, [0018]) to improve the binding effect of the cable tie (see binding, [0011]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to make the electrical connection structure of Wu with the cable tie of Hu in order to improve the binding effect of the cable tie. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 18 August 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants argue Hu does not disclose “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” because Hu discloses the two teeth 12 are located on the top walls of the holes of the two portions 3 and 4 respectively (P9/¶5). The pending claims must be "given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification." Under a broadest reasonable interpretation (i.e., BRI), words of the claim must be given their plain meaning, unless such meaning is inconsistent with the specification. See MPEP § 2111. The plain meaning of the term “bottom” is the point or part situated not far above the ground (see bottom, New Oxford American Dictionary; see low, New Oxford American Dictionary). The plain meaning of the term “on” is located some where in the general surface area of a place. The limitation “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” does not require the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth to be in direct contact with a bottom wall of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively, based on BRI. The BRI of the limitation “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” only requires the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth to be in the general surface area of a wall that is situated not far above the ground of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively. Hu discloses two teeth 12 are in the general surface area of a wall, which is situated not far above the ground, of the holes of the two portions 3 and 4 respectively. Therefore, Hu discloses “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively.” Applicants argue Ando does not disclose “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” because Hu discloses the locking claw 162 is formed on the top wall of the inserting hole 13 and the locking claw 152 is formed on the bottom wall of the inserting hole 12 (P12/¶2). The pending claims must be "given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification." Under a broadest reasonable interpretation (i.e., BRI), words of the claim must be given their plain meaning, unless such meaning is inconsistent with the specification. See MPEP § 2111. The plain meaning of the term “bottom” is the point or part situated not far above the ground (see bottom, New Oxford American Dictionary; see low, New Oxford American Dictionary). The plain meaning of the term “on” is located somewhere in the general surface area of a place. The limitation “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” does not require the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth to be in directly contact with a bottom wall of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively, based on BRI. The BRI of the limitation “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” only requires the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth to be in the general surface area of a wall that is situated not far above the ground of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively. Ando discloses locking claw 162 and the locking claw 152 are in the general surface area of a wall, which is situated not far above the ground, of the inserting holes 12 and 13 respectively. Therefore, Ando discloses “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively.” Applicants argue Wu does not disclose “both the second locking tooth and the third locking tooth are formed on bottom walls of the first snapping hole and the second snapping hole, respectively” (P13/¶1). One cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sean P Cullen, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1251. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 6:00 am to 4:00 pm CT, Friday 6:00 am to 12:00 pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia A Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean P Cullen, Ph.D./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Aug 18, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749762
BATTERY PACK
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749766
SEPARATOR INCLUDING POLYETHYLENE WITH HIGHLY ENTANGLED POLYMER CHAINS, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744260
LITHIUM ION BATTERIES
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744283
SEPARATOR FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731862
SEPARATOR AND BATTERY INCLUDING SEPARATOR
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1251 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month