Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/407,017

DYNAMIC OUTLIER BIAS REDUCTION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 19, 2011 — continuation of 9069725 +3 more
Examiner
AISAKA, BRYCE M
Art Unit
2851
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
647 granted / 740 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
747
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 740 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 2 recites “iteratively reining”, which appears to be a typo. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites multiple limitations with insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, e.g., at least “the at least one processor”, “the at least one machine learning model”, “the training data set”, and “the at least one operational variable”. Claims 6 and 7 both recite the limitation "the first improvement error values". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the set of error values”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the one or more performance outlier facilities”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-12 are dependent on claim 1, and are rejected for similar reasons. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the objections and rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action, and if nonelected claims 13-21 are cancelled. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not teach or suggest a method/system/apparatus for data set analysis having the combination of steps/elements in the claims including, among other elements, operation standard determination according to the outlier and outlier bias analysis of the claims. Mitra US 2011/0246409 A1 discloses data set analysis including analysis of outliers. Peace US 2004/0172401 discloses data set analysis including use of a random data set and identification of outliers. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRYCE M AISAKA whose telephone number is (571)270-5808. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 6:30AM-5:00PM PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Chiang can be reached at (571)272-7483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRYCE M AISAKA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2851
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12632638
USING PIXEL-BASED DEFINITION OF AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN TO PERFORM MACHINE-TRAINED ROUTING
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625745
OPTIMIZED PLACEMENT FOR EFFICIENCY FOR ACCELERATED DEEP LEARNING
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626176
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCALABLE QUANTUM COMPUTING
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619809
METHOD FOR FAULT DETECTION IN SAFETY MECHANISMS
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620641
BATTERY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 740 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month