Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/407,428

STACKED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 08, 2024
Priority
Feb 09, 2023 — provisional 63/444,345
Examiner
BRECHT, CHARLES MATTHEW
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Micron Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-68.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
17
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
98.2%
+58.2% vs TC avg
§102
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 8-13 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected method invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on May 18, 2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Invention 1 in the reply filed on May 18, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that there is overlapping subject matter. This is found persuasive and the examiner withdraws the restriction of claims 14-20. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sano et al. (2022/0285320, hereafter Sano). Regarding claim 1, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly, comprising: a redistribution layer (100, Fig. 1, par. 0038) having a first side and a second side opposite the first side; a first semiconductor die (200, Fig. 1, par. 0038) electrically coupled with the redistribution layer at the first side through first conductive structures (210, Fig. 1, par. 0038); and a stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 1, par. 0038) mounted on the first semiconductor die and electrically coupled with the redistribution layer, the stack of semiconductor dies including: a base semiconductor die (50U, Fig. 1, par. 0045) mounted on the first semiconductor die and electrically coupled with the redistribution layer at the first side through second conductive structures (70, Fig. 1, par. 0038); and one or more wires (17, Fig. 18, par. 0160) electrically coupling respective semiconductor dies of the stack of semiconductor dies. Regarding claim 2, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly wherein: each semiconductor die of the stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 1, par. 0038) includes an active side (F50a, Fig. 1, par. 0047) and a back side (F50b, Fig. 1, par. 0047) opposite the active side; and the stack of semiconductor dies is mounted on the first semiconductor die (200, Fig. 1, par. 0038) such that the active side of each semiconductor die of the stack of semiconductor dies faces the redistribution layer (100, Fig. 1, par. 0038). Regarding claim 3, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly wherein the first conductive structures (210, Fig. 1) or the second conductive structures (70, Fig. 1) include stud bump interconnects or pillar interconnects (par. 0038). Regarding claim 4, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly wherein the redistribution layer (100, Fig. 1) includes polyimide (par. 0075). Regarding claim 5, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly further comprising a mold (90, Fig. 1, par. 0038) disposed around the first semiconductor die (200, Fig. 1, par. 0038), the stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 1, par. 0038), the first conductive structures (210, Fig. 10, par. 0038), and the second conductive structures (70, Fig. 1, par. 0038), wherein the redistribution layer (100, Fig. 1, par. 0038) is in contact with the mold. Regarding claim 6, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly further comprising a substrate (2, Fig. 12, par. 0062) adhered directly to a topmost semiconductor die (50, Fig. 12, par. 0062) in the stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 12, par. 0062). Regarding claim 7, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the first semiconductor die (200, Fig. 1) comprises a logic die (par. 0052); and the stack of semiconductor dies (50, Fig. 1) includes a stack of memory dies (par. 0047). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sano in view of Leow et al. (2023/0268327, hereafter Leow). Regarding claim 14, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly, comprising: a redistribution layer (100, Fig. 1, par. 0038) having a first side and a second side opposite the first side; a first semiconductor die (200, Fig. 1, par. 0038) electrically coupled with the redistribution layer at the first side through first interconnects (210, Fig. 1, par. 0038); a stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 1, par. 0038) mounted on the first semiconductor die such that an active side (F50a, Fig. 1, par. 0047) of each semiconductor die of the stack of semiconductor dies faces the redistribution layer, the stack of semiconductor dies including: a base semiconductor die (50U, Fig. 1, par. 0038) mounted on the first semiconductor die and electrically coupled with the redistribution layer at the first side through second interconnects (70, Fig. 1, par. 0038); and one or more wires (17, Fig. 18, par. 0160) electrically coupling respective semiconductor dies of the stack of semiconductor dies; and an additional stack of semiconductor dies (S1, Fig. 1, par. 0038) mounted on and electrically coupled to the redistribution layer at the first side through third interconnects (30, Fig. 1, par. 0038) such that an active side (F10a, Fig. 1, par. 0040) of each semiconductor die of the additional stack of semiconductor dies faces the redistribution layer. Sano fails to disclose the additional stack of semiconductor dies including one or more additional wires electrically coupling respective semiconductor dies of the additional stack of semiconductor dies. However, Leow teaches the additional stack of semiconductor dies (125a/b/c/d, Fig. 1A, par. 0025) including one or more additional wires (130a, Fig. 1A, par. 0026) electrically coupling respective semiconductor dies of the additional stack of semiconductor dies. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify Sano with Leow by including wire coupling respective dies in the additional stack in order to allow universal communication while minimizing physical space. Regarding claim 15, Sano fails to disclose a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies comprises memory dies of a first type; and the additional stack of semiconductor dies comprises memory dies of a second type different from the first type. However, Leow teaches a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies (325, Fig. 3) comprises memory dies of a first type (par. 0041); and the additional stack of semiconductor dies (370, Fig. 3) comprises memory dies of a second type different from the first type (par. 0041). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify Sano with Leow by implementing stacks with a different memory type in order to optimize performance by implementing multiple modes of memory execution. Regarding claim 16, Sano fails to disclose a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies comprises one of: dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) dies and NOT-AND (NAND) dies; and the additional stack of semiconductor dies comprises another of: DRAM dies and NAND dies. However, Leow teaches a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies comprises (325, Fig. 3) one of: dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) dies and NOT-AND (NAND) dies (par. 0041); and the additional stack of semiconductor dies (370, Fig. 3) comprises another of: DRAM dies and NAND dies (par. 0041). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify Sano with Leow by implementing stacks with different memory types, DRAM and NAND, in order to optimize performance by utilizing active data processing alongside the capacity for permanent storage. Regarding claim 17, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly wherein the first interconnects (210, Fig. 1), the second interconnects (70, Fig. 1), or the third interconnects (30, Fig. 1) comprise stud bump interconnects or conductive pillar interconnects (par. 0038). Regarding claim 18, Sano fails to disclose a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies is shingled along a first direction; and the additional stack of semiconductor dies is shingled along a second direction different from the first direction. However, Leow teaches a semiconductor device assembly wherein: the stack of semiconductor dies is shingled along a first direction (225, Figs. 4A, 4B, 5A; par. 0032); and the additional stack of semiconductor dies is shingled along a second direction different from the first direction (325, Figs. 4A, 4B, 5A; par. 0040). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to modify Sano with Leow by providing stacks shingled in different directions in order to allow efficient connection without blocking access between chips, thus maximizing perimeter for wiring. Regarding claim 19, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly further comprising a mold (90, Fig. 1, par. 0038) disposed around the first semiconductor die, the stack of semiconductor dies, the additional stack of semiconductor dies, the first interconnects, the second interconnects, and the third interconnects, wherein the redistribution layer is in contact with the mold. Regarding claim 20, Sano discloses a semiconductor device assembly further comprising a substrate (2, Fig. 12, par. 0062) adhered directly to a topmost semiconductor die (50, Fig. 12) in the stack of semiconductor dies (S2, Fig. 12) and an additional topmost semiconductor die (10, Fig. 12) in the additional stack of semiconductor dies (S1, Fig. 12). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Shin (20220045010), in reference to claims in general; Huang (10276545), in reference to claims in general. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES M BRECHT whose telephone number is (571)272-9634. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon Fletcher can be reached at (572) 272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.M.B./ Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /MARLON T FLETCHER/ Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month