Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/410,362

METHOD FOR LAYING SUBMARINE CABLE SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2023 — JP 2023-054974
Examiner
ANDRISH, SEAN D
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
801 granted / 1120 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1168
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
76.0%
+36.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1120 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1 and 9 - 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites “the branching apparatus in the first trunk submarine cable” in lines 8 - 9 and “the branching apparatus included in the second trunk submarine cable” in lines 10 - 11. However, the specification does not describe a single branching apparatus in both the first trunk submarine cable and the second trunk submarine cable. As described in the original disclosure, one branching apparatus is included in the first trunk submarine cable and a second branching apparatus is included in the second trunk submarine cable. Therefore, the aforementioned limitation represents new matter. Regarding claim 10, the original disclosure does not describe “optical communication over the first and second trunk submarine cables is maintained during and after operations (b) and (c)”. Therefore, the aforementioned limitation represents new matter. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 9 - 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, it is unclear how many branching apparatuses are recited in the claim. A single branching apparatus is recited in lines 4, 9, and 10 - 11 but the claim also recites “each of the branching apparatuses” in line 12 which indicates that a plurality of branching apparatuses. Therefore, it is unclear whether the claim recites one branching apparatus or a plurality of branching apparatuses. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the branching apparatuses" in line 12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the fourth” (switch circuit) in lines 4 - 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the fifth” (switch circuit) in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the sixth” (switch circuit) in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 9 - 15 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN D ANDRISH whose telephone number is (571)270-3098. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 6:30 AM - 4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at 571-270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN D ANDRISH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678 SA 10/30/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637822
SLUICE GATE FOR A HYDROPOWER STATION
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624514
Woven Silt Fences Including Integrally Woven Pockets For Support Posts
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612753
PILING HAMMER AND METHOD FOR STRIKING PILE
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606974
SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR OFFSHORE WIND POWER GENERATOR AND METHOD OF INSTALLING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12601132
FISH TRANSFER SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1120 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month