Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/411,009

DETERMINATION OF UNDERCUT SIDEWALLS BASED ON AN IMAGE OF A SEMICONDUCTOR SPECIMEN

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 11, 2024
Examiner
WILBURN, MOLLY K
Art Unit
2666
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Applied Materials Israel Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
424 granted / 470 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 470 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-2, 4-11, 14, 16, and 20 are currently pending. Claims 3, 12-13, 15, and 17-19. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments I. Objections Examiner agrees the current amendment overcomes all previous objections to the drawings, specification, and claims. The original objections are withdrawn. New claim objections with response to claim 1 are below. II. 35 U.S.C. 112(b) Examiner agrees the current amendment overcomes all rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), the rejections are withdrawn. However, upon further consideration there are new rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) are below. III. 35 U.S.C. 101 Examiner agrees the current amendment overcomes all rejections under 35 U.S.C. 101, the rejections are withdrawn. IV. Prior art Examiner agrees the current amendment overcomes the prior art of record, all previous rejections are withdrawn. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to for the following typographical error, there is an errant period in line 15. Correction is required. Screenshot provided for clarity. PNG media_image1.png 62 727 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4-11, 14, 16, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the term “most values” in lines 18 and 20 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “most values” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner is interpreting this as values of the given attribute, or plurality of given attributes. Claims 2, 4-11, 14 and 16 depend from claim 1 and fail to remedy the indefiniteness of claim 1. Regarding claim 20, the term “most values” in lines 19 and 21 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “most values” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner is interpreting this as values of the given attribute, or plurality of given attributes. Allowable Subject Matter The claims are not rejected under the prior art and would be in condition for allowance if the above objections and rejections were overcome. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Molly K Wilburn whose telephone number is (571)272-3589. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Terrell can be reached at (571) 270-3717. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Molly Wilburn/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2666
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 03, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749156
PROGRESSIVE EXPLOITATION OF MULTI-ENERGY AND PHOTON COUNTING MODALITIES
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743881
Methods And Systems For Use In Identifying Features Of Crops
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727779
Techniques Implementing MRI for Cancer Classification
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12705765
OBJECT TRACKING USING OPTICAL FLOW
5y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702912
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROBOTIC CAMERA CALIBRATION
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 470 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month