Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/413,097

HEALTH CULTIVATION WINE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
AXTELL, ASHLEY
Art Unit
1792
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Changde Jizhi Biological Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
13%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 9m
To Grant
38%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 13% of cases
13%
Career Allow Rate
36 granted / 280 resolved
-52.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
335
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 280 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II claims 2-18 and 20 in the reply filed on 12/03/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 2, claim 2 recites “a preparation method of a health cultivation wine, wherein the health cultivation wine comprising the following raw materials calculated by weight percentage…..0.05-1% Panax quinquefolius; 0.75-1% Lyceum chinense; 0.25%-1% jujube; 0.75-1% Angelica sinensis; and 0.75-1% Rehmannia glutinosa”. However, claim 2 also requires in lines 33-42 that all the these claimed ingredients are mixed together and subjected to an extraction process to obtain an extraction product that is filtered and turned into a paste and then added to the wine mixture to produce the wine. It is unclear if the wine comprises the recited materials or extraction product from the recited materials, or both, since the claim requires in lines 1-5 that the wine comprises the ingredients in the recited amounts, but lines 33-42 require the extraction product from the recited materials and not the materials themselves. It is noted that the recited ingredients in lines 33-34 refer back to the same ingredients in lines 1-5. Additionally, lines 1-5 require proportions and line 34 requires “in proportion” it is unclear if the proportions in lines 1-5 apply to line 34. “where there is a great deal of confusion and uncertainty as to the proper interpretation of the limitations of a claim, it would not be proper to reject such a claim on the basis of prior art” (MPEP 2173.06). Regarding claim 2, claim 2 recites “the stored product” in lines 45. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Regarding claim 20, claim 20 is rejected for the same reasons given above as for claim 2. Claims 3-18 are rejected by virtue of their dependence on a rejected base claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY AXTELL whose telephone number is (571)270-0316. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00- 5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ERIK KASHNIKOW can be reached at 571-270-3475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.A/ Ashley AxtellExaminer, Art Unit 1792 /ERIK KASHNIKOW/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12564204
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STEAM FLAKING OF GRAINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12466630
FIBER-BASED SEPARATOR FOR COMPARTMENTALIZED COMPOSITE CAN
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12324537
BEVERAGE APPLIANCE WITH POD RECOGNITION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 10, 2025
Patent 12251054
Butter Products and Methods of Forming and Packaging Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 18, 2025
Patent 12245608
COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
13%
Grant Probability
38%
With Interview (+24.6%)
4y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 280 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month