Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/413,813

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 19, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0094022
Examiner
LI, MEIYA
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 933 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 933 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species I, claims 1-20, in the reply filed on May 29, 2026 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on January 16, 2024 and August 30, 2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings (Figs. 9A and 9B) are objected to because “FN” and “GC” have both been pointed to a same layer. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: “22 to 33E” should read “22-24, 25A-25E, 26, 27A-27E, 28, 29A-29E, 30, 31A-31E, 32 and 33A-33E” (first occurrence: [0035]); “34 to 39C” should read “34-38 and 39A-39C” (first occurrence: [0036]); “41 to 44D” should read “41, 42A-42D, 43 and 44A-44D” (first occurrence: [0038]); “48 to 51C” should read “48, 49A-49C, 50 and 51A-51C” (first occurrence: [0041]); “53 to 56C” should read “53, 54A-54C, 55, 56A-56C” (first occurrence: [0043]); “3A to 21” should read “3A-3F, 4, 5, 6A-6D, 7A-7B, 8, 9A-9B, 10A-10B, 11, 12A-12D, 13, 14A-14E, 15, 16A-16D, 17, 18, 19A-19E, 20 and 21” (first occurrence: [0096]); “5 to 6D” should read “5 and 6A-6D” (first occurrence [0108]); “8 to 9B” should read “8, 9A and 9B” (first occurrence [0110]); “11 to 12D” should read “11 and 12A-12D” (first occurrence: [0122]); “13 to 14E” should read “13 and 14A-14E” (first occurrence [0126]); “1A to 2E” should read “1A, 1B and 2A-2E” (first occurrence [0129]); “15 to 19E” should read “15, 16A-16D, 17, 18 and 19A-19E” (first occurrence [0134]); “15 to 16D” should read “15 and 16A-16D” (first occurrence [0136]); “18 to 19E” should read “18 and 19A-19E” (first occurrence [0138]); “22 to 59C” should read “22-24, 25A-25E, 26, 27A-27E, 28, 29A-29E, 30, 31A-31E, 32, 33A-33E, 34-38, 39A-39C, 40, 41, 42A-42D, 43, 44A-44D, 45A-45B, 46-48, 49A-49C, 50, 51A-51C, 52A-52E, 53, 54A-54C, 55, 56A-56C, 57, 58 and 59A-59C” (first occurrence [0149]); “23A” should read “23” ([0150]); “26 to 27E” should read “26 and 27A-27E” (first occurrence [0159]); “28 to 29E” should read “28 and 29A-29E” (first occurrence [0162]); “30 to 31E” should read “30 and 31A-31E” (first occurrence [0164]); “32 to 33E” should read “32 and 32A-32E” (first occurrence [0169]); “24 to 25E” should read “24 and 25A-25E” (first occurrence [0180]); “38 to 39C” should read “38 and 39A-39C” (first occurrence [0182]); “41 to 42D” should read “41 and 42A-42D” (first occurrence: [0188]); “28A to 29D” should read “28 and 29A-29E” (first occurrence [0189]); “43 to 44D” should read “43 and 44A-44D” (first occurrence [0191]); “48 to 49C” should read “48 and 49A-49C” (first occurrence [0201]); “50 to 51C” should read “50 and 51A-51C” (first occurrence [0202]); “55 to 56C” should read “55 and 56A-56C” (first occurrence [0218]). Appropriate correction is required. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claimed limitation of “a first word line … extending in a second direction”, as recited in claims 1, 10 and 17, is unclear as to which dimension of the first word line extending in a second direction applicant refers. The claimed limitation of “a bit line … extending in a third direction”, as recited in claims 1, 10 and 17, is unclear as to which dimension of the bit line extending in a third direction applicant refers. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not teach or suggest, singularly or in combination, at least the limitations of “the first edge portion comprises a first top surface and a second top surface, wherein the second top surface of the first edge portion is closer to the second edge portion than the first top surface of the first edge portion, and wherein the first top surface of the first edge portion is at a level that is higher than a level of the second top surface of the first edge portion”, as recited in claim 1; “the first edge portion comprises an upper portion and a lower portion, and wherein the upper portion of the first edge portion is recessed in the second direction such that a width of the upper portion of the first edge portion in the second direction is less than a width of the lower portion of the first edge portion in the second direction”, as recited in claim 10; and “the first edge portion comprises a first side surface and a second side surface, wherein the second side surface of the first edge portion is closer to the second edge portion than the first side surface of the first edge portion, wherein the first side surface of the first edge portion has a linear profile, and wherein the second side surface of the first edge portion has a stepwise profile”, as recited in claim 17. Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ref's A-F are cited as being related to a semiconductor device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEIYA LI whose telephone number is (571)270-1572. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-3PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LYNNE GURLEY can be reached at (571)272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEIYA LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 14, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707642
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696455
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684903
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12660313
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660436
LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+25.4%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 933 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month