Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/414,087

BATTERY TOWER DESIGN FOR HEAVY-DUTY ELECTRIC POWERTRAINS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Examiner
SLIFKA, SARAH A
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Caterpillar Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
540 granted / 715 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group II, claims 8-20, in the reply filed on 07/28/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the inventions are capable of being used together, do not have a materially different design or mode of operation, and the inventions overlap in scope. This is not found persuasive because the inventions are mutually exclusive and have a materially different design insofar as the structure of Group I requires a compressible material whereas the structure of Group II required a first and second heat transfer device. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 8-11, and 13-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jang et al (US 2024/0347832). Regarding claim 8, Jang teaches a battery pack including a plurality of battery assemblies, and a pack of housing configured to accommodate the battery assemblies. The pack housing includes a unit frame assembly (0010). In figures 2 and 3, a plurality of battery modules 10 are shown as being installed in a pack housing 21 of a battery pack 20. Each battery module 10 is installed between partition walls 22 provided on a base plate 23 of the pack housing 21. A heat transfer member l’ made of a thermal conductive adhesive or the like may be disposed between the battery module and the base plate 23 on which the module is mounted. A cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). The heat transfer member l’ is considered to be the instantly claimed first heat transfer device and the cooling plate 24 is considered to be the second heat transfer device thermally coupled with the heat transfer device l’. Regarding claim 9, Jang teaches in figures 2 and 3, a plurality of battery modules 10 being installed in a pack housing 21 of a battery pack 20. Each battery module 10 is installed between partition walls 22 provided on a base plate 23 of the pack housing 21 (0067). Regarding claim 10, Jang teaches the batteries can be connected in series (0004). Regarding claim 11, Jang teaches the battery cells to be stacked and surfaces of adjacent battery cells may be fixed to each other through double-sided tape (0076) which is considered to be a compressible material. Regarding claim 13, Jang teaches a cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). Regarding claim 14, Jang teaches busbar assemblies 120 which are coupled to electrode leads at the front and rear end portions of the cell stack base unit 100. The busbar assembly 120 may include an inter-busbar 122 that electrically connected the battery cells (0077). Regarding claim 15, Jang shows in figure 2 the battery cells arranged with alternating positive and negative terminals along a first edge of the frame, as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12 and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang et al (US 2024/0347832) Regarding claim 12, Jang teaches a battery pack including a plurality of battery assemblies, as discussed above. A heat transfer member l’ made of a thermal conductive adhesive or the like may be disposed between the battery module and the base plate 23 on which the module is mounted. A cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). The heat transfer member l’ is considered to be the instantly claimed first heat transfer device and the cooling plate 24 is considered to be the second heat transfer device thermally coupled with the heat transfer device l’. Jang does not explicitly teach the first heat transfer device to be a metal conductor, as claimed. As Jang teaches the heat transfer member to be a thermal conductive adhesive, or the like, it is considered that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to utilize any known heat transfer device, such as a metal conductor, as such would have been well within the purview of an ordinarily skilled artisan without undue experimentation and with a reasonable expectation of success. Regarding claim 16, Jang teaches a battery pack including a plurality of battery assemblies, and a pack of housing configured to accommodate the battery assemblies. The pack housing includes a unit frame assembly (0010). In figures 2 and 3, a plurality of battery modules 10 are shown as being installed in a pack housing 21 of a battery pack 20. Each battery module 10 is installed between partition walls 22 provided on a base plate 23 of the pack housing 21. A heat transfer member l’ made of a thermal conductive adhesive or the like may be disposed between the battery module and the base plate 23 on which the module is mounted. A cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). The heat transfer member l’ is considered to be the instantly claimed first heat transfer device and the cooling plate 24 is considered to be the second heat transfer device thermally coupled with the heat transfer device l’. Jang does not explicitly teach the housing being shaped to fit within a powertrain compartment of a heavy-duty vehicle after a fuel-based powertrain is removed from a chassis of the heavy-duty vehicle, as claimed. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to shape the housing in any shape dependent upon the desired use for the housed module as a means of design choice. It is noted that the claim is drawn to the battery module and not the heavy-duty vehicle. Regarding claim 17, Jang teaches the batteries can be connected in series (0004). Jang shows in figure 2 the battery cells arranged with alternating positive and negative terminals along a first edge of the frame, as claimed. Regarding claim 18, Jang teaches the batteries can be connected in series (0004). Regarding claim 19, Jang teaches a battery pack including a plurality of battery assemblies, as discussed above. A heat transfer member l’ made of a thermal conductive adhesive or the like may be disposed between the battery module and the base plate 23 on which the module is mounted. A cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). The heat transfer member l’ is considered to be the instantly claimed first heat transfer device and the cooling plate 24 is considered to be the second heat transfer device thermally coupled with the heat transfer device l’. Jang does not explicitly teach the first heat transfer device to be a metal conductor, as claimed. As Jang teaches the heat transfer member to be a thermal conductive adhesive, or the like, it is considered that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to utilize any known heat transfer device, such as a metal conductor, as such would have been well within the purview of an ordinarily skilled artisan without undue experimentation and with a reasonable expectation of success. Regarding claim 20, Jang teaches a cooling plate 24 is disposed below the base plate 23 (0067). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH A SLIFKA whose telephone number is (571)270-5838. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5:30pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 571-272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH A. SLIFKA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759 September 23, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770957
BATTERY AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770916
ION CONDUCTIVE SOLID AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770954
Composite Heating System, and Heating Method and Heating Apparatus Thereof
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763400
BATTERY COOLING STRUCTURE FOR VEHICLE
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763389
SENSOR UNIT AND SENSOR UNIT-EQUIPPED BATTERY WIRING MODULE
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.3%)
3y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month