Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/414,139

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0027210
Examiner
TRAN, BENJAMIN HOANG
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-68.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
1
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
100.0%
+60.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Should applicant desire to obtain the benefit of foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) prior to declaration of an interference, a certified English translation of the foreign application must be submitted in reply to this action. 37 CFR 41.154(b) and 41.202(e). Failure to provide a certified translation may result in no benefit being accorded for the non-English application. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, The specific location of the driving circuit transistor or dummy transistor (claim 3) (not shown because the layer TFT extends from the display area AA into the non-display area NA and it is unclear); and The metal layers of the transistor (claim 5) (transistor only shown as layer TFT with no metal layers specified) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation “a transistor electrically connected to a pad disposed in the pad area, and disposed in the non-display area” in lines 2-3. It is unclear as to whether the transistor itself is disposed in the non-display area or if due to the pad being disposed in the non-display area, the electrical connection to the pad area has to happen in the non-display area. For the purpose of examination, the limitation will be interpreted as “a transistor disposed in the non-display area, electrically connected to a pad disposed in the pad area”. Claim 7 recites the limitation "another metal material" in the second line. The claim is unclear as to what the ‘other’ metal material is referring to, and if the metal material stated in the claim is required to be distinctly different from that previous metal. For the purpose of examination, the limitation will be interpreted as, “a metal material”. Dependent claims 3 - 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) based on their dependency on parent claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Rejection Note: Italicized claim limitations indicate limitations that are not explicitly disclosed in the primary reference, but disclosed in the secondary reference(s) Claims 1-7, 9, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim Jaehyeong et al. (US 2021/0134931 A1; hereinafter Kim 931) in view of Kim Jae Hong et al. (KR 2021/0086029 A; hereinafter Kim 029). Regarding claim 1, Kim 931 teaches a display device (Fig. 4, 10, 11), comprising: a substrate (Fig. 11: substrate 101) including a display area (Fig. 10: AA) and a non-display area (Fig. 10: “The non-display area corresponds to the edge area of the display panel”; [0258]); a pad area (Fig. 10: lower end portion of the display panel; [0262]) disposed in the non-display area (“The non-display area includes a pad area… plurality of pads 155”; [0262]); a printed circuit board electrically connected to the pad area; an encapsulation layer (115h; [0299]) formed of a metal material (Fig. 11: 115h; "may be formed of… or aluminum oxide (AlyOz); [0143]) and disposed on the substrate (Fig. 11); a protection layer (Fig. 11: planarization layer 115e) formed of a non-metallic material (“may be formed of one or more materials selected from among acrylic resin…”; [0116]) and disposed on the encapsulation layer (Fig. 11: layers 115h and 115e shown disposed on each other); a heat dissipation plate disposed on the protection layer; and a ground member (Fig. 11: doped layer 145 and electrode 533; [0267]) positioned on the substrate and connected between the pad area and the encapsulation layer (Fig. 11: electrode 533 in contact with encapsulation layer 115h and “may be connected to the pads 145”; [0268]). Kim 029 discloses the following claim limitations not disclosed in Kim 931: a printed circuit board (Fig. 5: circuit element 161, may be a flexible printed circuit (fpc); Pg. 105, [0142]) electrically connected to the pad area (Fig. 5, “161 may be bonded to the pad part through an anisotropic conductive film”; Pg. 104, [0141]); a heat dissipation plate (Fig. 8: heat dissipation sheet 180; Pg. 126 [0178]) disposed on the protection layer (Fig. 8: back cover 101, “can serve to cushion external shocks”; [0170]); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the PCB and heat dissipation sheet of Kim 029 in order to provide signals to the display area, and to evenly dissipate heat from the display device. Regarding claim 2, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 1, further comprising a transistor (“a driver IC… can be implemented as transistors”; [0076]) electrically connected to a pad disposed in the pad area (“A driver IC, a driving circuit, or a flexible film may be connected to the pad area through the plurality of pads 155”; [0077]), and disposed in the non-display area (stated that it “may be disposed in the non-display area”; [0076]). Regarding claim 3, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 2, wherein the transistor includes a driving circuit transistor included in a gate driving circuit disposed in the non-display area or a dummy transistor disposed in the non-display area (“the driver IC may include a gate driver, a data driver, and the like”, with the driving circuit and gate driving circuit are analogous with a gate driver and the data driver respectively; [0076]). Regarding claim 4, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 2, wherein the ground member (Fig. 11: 533 and 145) includes: a ground pattern (Fig. 11: electrode 533, “extending through a plurality of contact holes 540 is electrically connected to the doped layer (or conductive layer) 145… may also be connected (or grounded) to the low-potential power supply line”) patterned on the substrate to have a preset shape and electrically connect the transistor to the pad area (Fig. 10, 4, 2: 533 “formed by extending the cathode of the light emitting element”, in which the light emitting element is stated to be 130 and connecting to the transistor through lines 117 and 116, and is also connected to the pads 155, [0053] – [0055], [0268] – [0269]); and a conductive member (Fig. 11 doped layer 145) surrounding a portion of the protection layer, the encapsulation layer, and the ground pattern (Fig. 10: doped layer 145 shown having a “quadrangular frame shape” surrounding the edge of the non-display area, thereby surrounding all other layers presently disclosed; [0271] – [0273]). Regarding claim 5, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 4, wherein: the ground pattern is formed on a same layer as at least one metal layer of the transistor (Fig. 4 and 11: ground pattern 533 connected to layer 145 via plurality of contact holes 540, extending through layers 115f to 110, which extends past the transistor layers 115a to 115e, shown in Fig. 4 with transistor 120) Regarding claim 6, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 4, wherein the ground pattern extends to the pad area along an edge of the substrate (Fig. 10: electrode 533 shown “extend[ing] in a direction towards the non-display area as to overlap a portion of the doped layer 145”, and may be connected to the pads 155 in a “rectangular shape”; [0274] and [0296]). Regarding claim 7, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 4, wherein the ground pattern is formed by depositing another metal material on the substrate (the second electrode 533 stated that it “may be formed of a metallic material”; [0269]). Regarding claim 9, Kim 931 teaches the display device of claim 4, wherein the conductive member is formed to cover: a side rear surface of the ground pattern (Fig. 11: doped layer 145 disposed below 533); a side portion of the encapsulation layer and the protection layer (Fig. 10-11: layer 145 disposed below and covering the bottom side of layers 115h and 115e, as well has surrounding the embodiment from a planar view); and a rear surface of the protection layer (Fig. 11: a rear surface of the layer 115e is covered by the doped layer 145 “formed to overlap a portion of the display area as well as the non-display area”; [0286]). Regarding claim 11, Kim 931 does not explicitly teach the display device of claim 1, wherein the heat dissipation plate is attached to the protection layer through an adhesive. However, Kim 029 teaches the heat dissipation plate (Fig. 8: 180) is attached to the protection layer (Fig. 8: 101) through an adhesive (Fig. 8: back plate 101 is attached to cushion tape 170 by an adhesive PSA, which is then attached to heat dissipation sheet 180; Pg. 124 - 126 [0175] – [0178]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the adhesive of Kim 029 in order to connect the heat dissipation plate to the protective layer. Claims 8 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim 931 in view of Kim 029 and in further view of Kim Sang Youn et al. (KR 2008/0010108 A; hereinafter Kim 108). Regarding claim 8, Kim 931 doesn’t teach the display device of claim 4, wherein the ground pattern is formed by attaching a conductive tape to the substrate. However, Kim 108 teaches wherein the ground pattern is formed by attaching a conductive tape to the substrate (Fig. 5: A conductive tape 800 for grounding attached to the tft substrate 112 of the LCD panel 110; Pg. 16, [0071] – [0073]). Kim 108 also teaches that the conductive tape connects multiple gate drive chips and connected earths, serving to further stabilize the ground voltage of the gate drivers. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the conductive tape of Kim 108 in order to stabilize the ground voltage of the gate drivers. Regarding claim 12, Kim 931 does not explicitly teach the display device of claim 1, further comprising a chip-on-film electrically connecting the pad area to the printed circuit board. However, Kim 108 teaches a chip-on-film (Fig. 1: flexible circuit board 125, stated that a flexible circuit board could be a COF: Pg. 21) electrically connecting the pad area to the printed circuit board (Fig. 1 and 2: 125 connected to data-side and gate-side printed circuit board (130, 135) and the pad area formed of electrode pads 114: Pg. 25). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the circuit board connection of Kim 108 in order to apply external image signals and gate driving signals to the thin-film transistors. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim 931 in view of Kim 029 and in further view of Karenzos, Marcos et al. (US 2002/0127778 A1; hereinafter Karenzos). Regarding claim 10, Kim 931 does not explicitly teach the display device of claim 4, wherein the conductive member is formed of silver (Ag) and has a spherical surface. However, Karenzos teaches the conductive member (Fig. 2-3: parts 72,73, and 74) is formed of silver (Ag) (Fig. 2-3: silver plated sites 74: [0038]) and has a spherical surface (Fig. 2-3: ground ball 72: [0038]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the ground balls of Karenzos, in order to provide better conductivity to ground by filling or replacing the contact holes with the ground balls. Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim 931 in view of Kim 029 and in further view of Kim Tae Hyuck et al. (KR 2008/0021985 A; hereinafter Kim 985) Regarding claim 13, Kim 931 does not explicitly teach the display device of claim 1, further comprising: a back cover covering a rear surface of the substrate; and a conductive gasket disposed between the back cover and the printed circuit board. However, Kim 985 teaches: a back cover covering a rear surface of the substrate (Fig. 5 and 7: bottom cover 150); and a conductive gasket (Fig. 7: conductive member 140) disposed between the back cover and the printed circuit board (Fig. 7: connected between bottom cover 150 and printed circuit board 120). Kim 985 also teaches, that the conductive member creates an even gap between the PCB, and the case of the display improving the appearance quality of the display (Pg. 15, para. 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the back cover and gasket of Kim 985 in order to improve the appearance quality of the display. Regarding claim 14, Kim 931 does not teach the display device of claim 13, wherein the back cover includes a ground potential, and wherein the conductive gasket is electrically connected to the ground potential of the back cover and the printed circuit board. However, Kim 985 teaches the back cover includes a ground potential (Bottom cover is grounded and can “easily discharge the static electricity flowing from the outside”; [ Pg. 16, para. 5), and wherein the conductive gasket is electrically connected to the ground potential of the back cover and the printed circuit board (Fig. 7: “conductive member 140 electrically connects the ground pattern 124 and bottom cover of the printed circuit board 120”; Pg. 16, last paragraph). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the display device of Kim 931 with the back cover of Kim 985 in order to discharge the static electricity to the back cover of the display. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN HOANG TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-0290. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:00 am - 5:00 pm . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kretelia Graham can be reached at (571) 272-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN HOANG TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /Kretelia Graham/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month