Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/414,748

APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATION AUDIO GROUPING AND POSITIONING

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jan 17, 2024
Priority
Jan 26, 2023 — GB 2301108.3
Examiner
MOHAMMED, ASSAD
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
434 granted / 592 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
612
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
96.9%
+56.9% vs TC avg
§102
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 2. Claim(s) 1, 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Meade et al. (US 11,523,244) in view of Brown et al. (US 2018/0359294). Regarding claim 1, Meade teaches a method for generating spatial reproduction of communication audio, the method comprising: obtaining at least one communication audio signal from at least one communication channel; obtaining at least one acoustic parameter based on the at least one communication audio signal (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61. The speech signal is produced and a noise suppressor in a virtual conference. The spatializer may perform binaural rendering by applying the spatial filters (e.g., head-related transfer functions (HRTFs)) to the input audio signal(s) of the audio file(s) to produce spatially rendered input audio signals or binaural signals (e.g., a left audio signal for a left ear of the user, and a right audio signal for a right ear of the user). The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space.); obtaining a spatial audio position at least in part based on the at least one acoustic parameter (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space. The audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. In one aspect, the spatializer may apply at least one spatial filter upon the generated output audio channels to produce the spatially rendered input audio signal.). Meade discloses an audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. However Meade is vague on generating the spatial reproduction of communication audio using the spatial audio position while the at least one communication channel is in use. Brown teaches generating the spatial reproduction of communication audio using the spatial audio position while the at least one communication channel is in use (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). The combination of the Brown to Meade provides the spatial audio according to the position of the audio signal being generated. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 11, Meade teaches an apparatus for generating spatial reproduction of communication audio, the apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: obtain at least one communication audio signal from at least one communication channel; obtain at least one acoustic parameter based on the at least one communication audio signal (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61. The speech signal is produced and a noise suppressor in a virtual conference. The spatializer may perform binaural rendering by applying the spatial filters (e.g., head-related transfer functions (HRTFs)) to the input audio signal(s) of the audio file(s) to produce spatially rendered input audio signals or binaural signals (e.g., a left audio signal for a left ear of the user, and a right audio signal for a right ear of the user). The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space.); obtain a spatial audio position at least in part based on the at least one acoustic parameter (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space. The audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. In one aspect, the spatializer may apply at least one spatial filter upon the generated output audio channels to produce the spatially rendered input audio signal.). Meade discloses an audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. However Meade is vague on generate the spatial reproduction of communication audio using the spatial audio position while the at least one communication channel is in use. Brown teaches generate the spatial reproduction of communication audio using the spatial audio position while the at least one communication channel is in use (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). The combination of the Brown to Meade provides the spatial audio according to the position of the audio signal being generated. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. 3. Claim(s) 2, 4, 5, 6, 12, 14, 15, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Meade et al. (US 11,523,244) in view of Brown et al. (US 2018/0359294) in further view of Rollow, IV (US 2020/0145753). Regarding claim 2, Meade and Brown do not teach the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein obtaining the spatial audio position comprises determining an updated spatial position, and wherein the updated spatial position is independent of an input spatial position of the communication audio signal. Rollow teaches wherein obtaining the spatial audio position comprises determining an updated spatial position, and wherein the updated spatial position is independent of an input spatial position of the communication audio signal (see fig. 2, ¶ 0054. Directional information creates a spatial audio signal which can be reproduced by the plurality of speakers. The binaural rendering engine is used to render at the receiving side an audio signal at a virtual audio source position that corresponds to a speaker's position in the conference room. A continuous stream enabling a specification of updated locations of the participants or talkers in the conference room. This would be independent of the audio signal.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade and Brown to incorporate position of the spatial audio being updated during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being updated during a call. Regarding claim 4, Meade teaches method as claimed in claim 2, further comprising receiving the input spatial position of the communication audio signal from the at least one communication channel (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61. The speech signal is produced and a noise suppressor in a virtual conference. The spatializer may perform binaural rendering by applying the spatial filters (e.g., head-related transfer functions (HRTFs)) to the input audio signal(s) of the audio file(s) to produce spatially rendered input audio signals or binaural signals (e.g., a left audio signal for a left ear of the user, and a right audio signal for a right ear of the user). The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space.). Regarding claim 5, Meade teaches the method as claimed in claim 2, further comprising updating the input spatial position of the communication audio signal further based on the at least one acoustic parameter (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space. The audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. In one aspect, the spatializer may apply at least one spatial filter upon the generated output audio channels to produce the spatially rendered input audio signal.). Regarding claim 6, Meade and Rollow do not teach the method as claimed in claim 2, further comprising determining the input spatial position of the communication audio signal based on analysing the at least one communication audio signal. Brown teaches the method as claimed in claim 2, further comprising determining the input spatial position of the communication audio signal based on analysing the at least one communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 12, Meade and Brown do not teach the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the apparatus being caused to obtain the spatial audio position comprises the apparatus being caused to determine an updated spatial position, wherein the updated spatial position is independent of an input spatial position of the communication audio signal. Rollow teaches wherein the apparatus being caused to obtain the spatial audio position comprises the apparatus being caused to determine an updated spatial position, wherein the updated spatial position is independent of an input spatial position of the communication audio signal (see fig. 2, ¶ 0054. Directional information creates a spatial audio signal which can be reproduced by the plurality of speakers. The binaural rendering engine is used to render at the receiving side an audio signal at a virtual audio source position that corresponds to a speaker's position in the conference room. A continuous stream enabling a specification of updated locations of the participants or talkers in the conference room. This would be independent of the audio signal.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade and Brown to incorporate position of the spatial audio being updated during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being updated during a call. Regarding claim 14, Meade teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the apparatus is further caused to receive an input spatial position of the communication audio signal from the at least one communication channel (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61. The speech signal is produced and a noise suppressor in a virtual conference. The spatializer may perform binaural rendering by applying the spatial filters (e.g., head-related transfer functions (HRTFs)) to the input audio signal(s) of the audio file(s) to produce spatially rendered input audio signals or binaural signals (e.g., a left audio signal for a left ear of the user, and a right audio signal for a right ear of the user). The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space.). Regarding claim 15, Meade teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 14, wherein the apparatus is caused to update the input spatial position of the communication audio signal further based on the at least one acoustic parameter (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The spatially rendered audio signals produced by the spatializer are configured to cause speakers (e.g., speaker 20) to produce spatial audio cues to give a user the perception that sounds are being emitted from a particular location within an acoustic space. The audio source device may display the CGR session from a (e.g., first-person) perspective of an avatar associated with the user of the device. The controller may adjust the spatial and/or visual rendering of the VR session according to changes in the avatar's position and/or orientation. Audio spatializer can process an input audio signal (e.g., of audio file) using the estimated model and the measured acoustic parameters, and generate output audio channels (e.g., signal) having a virtual sound source that may have a virtual location in the virtual (or MR) environment. In one aspect, the spatializer may apply at least one spatial filter upon the generated output audio channels to produce the spatially rendered input audio signal.). Regarding claim 16, Meade and Rollow do not teach the apparatus as claimed in claim 12, wherein the apparatus is caused to determine the input spatial position of the communication audio signal based on analysing the at least one communication audio signal. Brown teaches wherein the apparatus is caused to determine the input spatial position of the communication audio signal based on analysing the at least one communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. 4. Claim(s) 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Meade et al. (US 11,523,244) in view of Brown et al. (US 2018/0359294). Regarding claim 3, Meade does not teach the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein obtaining the spatial audio position comprises determining an updated spatial position, and wherein the updated spatial position is at least in part further based on an input spatial position of the communication audio signal. Brown teaches wherein obtaining the spatial audio position comprises determining an updated spatial position, and wherein the updated spatial position is at least in part further based on an input spatial position of the communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 7, Meade teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one acoustic parameter relates to a background audio characteristic of the at least one communication audio signal (see col. 6, lines 36-, col. 7, line 19, col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The voice of a user who is participating in a CGR session, such as a VR session, while attenuating background ambient noises from the physical environment in order to provide a more immersive and acoustically accurate experience.). Regarding claim 8, Meade teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the spatial reproduction of communication audio assists in the generation of an immersive communication audio scene (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The controller includes an audio spatializer that is configured to spatially render audio file(s) associated with the VR session to produce spatial audio in order to provide an immersive audio experience to the user of the audio source device and/or audio receiver device.). Regarding claim 9, Meade does not teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein obtaining the at least one communication audio signal comprises obtaining a plurality of communication audio signals and the method further comprises determining respective at least one acoustic parameter from each communication audio signal to update a respective spatial audio position of each communication audio signal. Brown teaches wherein obtaining the at least one communication audio signal comprises obtaining a plurality of communication audio signals and the method further comprises determining respective at least one acoustic parameter from each communication audio signal to update a respective spatial audio position of each communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 10, Meade does not teach the method as claimed in claim 9, further comprises at least one of: grouping communication audio signals that have similar acoustic parameters close to each other; providing the communication audio signals of the group with close spatial audio positions with respect to each other; or providing communication audio signals having dissimilar acoustic parameters that are spatially positioned further apart from each other. Brown teaches the method as claimed in claim 9, further comprises at least one of: grouping communication audio signals that have similar acoustic parameters close to each other; providing the communication audio signals of the group with close spatial audio positions with respect to each other; or providing communication audio signals having dissimilar acoustic parameters that are spatially positioned further apart from each other (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0023-0024, 0036, claim 2. Each of the audio signals with a group based on the corresponding metadata, wherein the group of audio signals is associated with a similar type of spatial position in the virtual representation of the conference call).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate grouping similar signals based on parameters of the audio signals. The modification provides for wherein the group of audio signals is associated with a similar type of spatial position in the virtual representation of the conference call. Regarding claim 13, Meade does not teach the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the apparatus being caused to obtain the spatial audio position comprises the apparatus being caused to determine an updated spatial position, wherein the updated spatial position is at least in part further based on an input spatial position of the communication audio signal. Brown teaches wherein the apparatus being caused to obtain the spatial audio position comprises the apparatus being caused to determine an updated spatial position, wherein the updated spatial position is at least in part further based on an input spatial position of the communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 17, Meade teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the at least one acoustic parameter relates to a background audio characteristic of the at least one communication audio signal (see col. 6, lines 36-, col. 7, line 19, col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The voice of a user who is participating in a CGR session, such as a VR session, while attenuating background ambient noises from the physical environment in order to provide a more immersive and acoustically accurate experience.). Regarding claim 18, Meade teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the spatial reproduction of communication audio assists in the generation of an immersive communication audio scene (see col. 12, lines 5-col. 13. lines 29, 56-61, col. 16, lines 31-38. The controller includes an audio spatializer that is configured to spatially render audio file(s) associated with the VR session to produce spatial audio in order to provide an immersive audio experience to the user of the audio source device and/or audio receiver device.). Regarding claim 19, Meade does not teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, wherein the obtained at least one communication audio signal comprises a plurality of communication audio signals and the apparatus is caused to determine a respective at least one acoustic parameter from each communication audio signal to update a respective spatial audio position of each communication audio signal. Brown teaches wherein the obtained at least one communication audio signal comprises a plurality of communication audio signals and the apparatus is caused to determine a respective at least one acoustic parameter from each communication audio signal to update a respective spatial audio position of each communication audio signal (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0010-0011, 0018. The position of the caller in the virtual audio environment being assigned based on groupings of the callers. Callers belonging to the same group may be clustered together and assigned spatial positions of a similar type, such that listener may intuitively know to associate a particular type of spatial position (e.g., direction) with a description. The groupings may be based on metadata, such as affiliation (e.g., company, family), geographic location, call signal quality, etc., or any combination thereof. In a situation where metadata indicates that there are 2 distinct groups, callers from the first group may be assigned to spatial positions to the left of listener. These callers may be assigned at any position to the left of listener (e.g., any position to the left side of axis) or along a particular axis to the left of listener. Callers from the second group may be assigned to spatial positions to the right of listener (e.g., any position to the right side of axis).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate position of the spatial audio being generate during conference call. The modification provides for spatial audio position for audio being generated from a direction during a call. Regarding claim 20, Meade does not teach the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, is further caused to at least one of: group communication audio signals that have similar acoustic parameters close to each other; provide the communication audio signals of the group with close spatial audio positions with respect to each other; or provide communication audio signals having dissimilar acoustic parameters that are spatially positioned further apart from each other. Brown teaches the apparatus as claimed in claim 11, is further caused to at least one of: group communication audio signals that have similar acoustic parameters close to each other; provide the communication audio signals of the group with close spatial audio positions with respect to each other; or provide communication audio signals having dissimilar acoustic parameters that are spatially positioned further apart from each other (see fig.1-2, ¶ 0023-0024, 0036, claim 2. Each of the audio signals with a group based on the corresponding metadata, wherein the group of audio signals is associated with a similar type of spatial position in the virtual representation of the conference call).). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Meade to incorporate grouping similar signals based on parameters of the audio signals. The modification provides for wherein the group of audio signals is associated with a similar type of spatial position in the virtual representation of the conference call. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASSAD MOHAMMED whose telephone number is (571)270-7253. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASSAD MOHAMMED/Examiner, Art Unit 2691 /DUC NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 11, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12632613
SEGMENTED BLURRING IN A CONFERENCE ROOM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621413
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UPDATING A SECURITY USER INTERFACE BASED ON SCHEDULED MODES
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12604149
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF FOR OUTPUTTING AUDIO DATA
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598441
AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587801
RE-MIXING A COMPOSITE AUDIO PROGRAM FOR PLAYBACK WITHIN A REAL-WORLD VENUE
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+11.2%)
3y 1m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month