Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/415,693

ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND TRACTION BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 18, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2021 — CN 202122970315.7 +1 more
Examiner
CULLEN, SEAN P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
861 granted / 1246 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1275
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1246 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims and Other Notes Claims 1–14 are pending. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The paragraph numbers cited in this Office Action in reference to the instant application are referring to the paragraph numbering of the PG-Pub of the instant application. See US 2024/0154263 A1. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 18 January 2024 and 30 April 2025 were filed before the mailing of a first Office Action on the merits. The submissions comply with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to because: The numbers, letters, and/or reference characters of FIGS. 1, 3, 6, and 10 are not at least 0.32 cm (1/8 inch) in height. Numbers, letters, and reference characters must measure at least 0.32 cm. (1/8 inch) in height. See 37 CFR 1.84 (p)(3). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY HAVING TAB WITH BENT PORTION AT FREE END, AND TRACTION BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Reference character 220 is referred to as an outermost bent section in paragraph [0058]. Reference character 220 is used to designate a bent portion. Reference character 220 should not be used to designate an outermost bent portion. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 7, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the bent free end" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the at least one tab" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "a weld spot." Claim 12, which claim 13 is directly dependent, recites the limitation "a weld spot." It is unclear if "a weld spot" recited in claim 13 is further limiting or referencing "a weld spot" recited in claim 12. Claim 12 has provided antecedent basis for the term "weld spot." However, claim 13 does not include a modifier (e.g., the or said) indicating the term "weld spot" is further limiting or referencing "a weld spot" recited in claim 12. Claim Interpretation The pending claims must be "given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification." Under a broadest reasonable interpretation, words of the claim must be given their plain meaning, unless such meaning is inconsistent with the specification. See MPEP § 2111. Claim 14 recites the limitation "wherein the tape has a slit corresponding to the weld spot." The plain meaning of the term "slit" is a long narrow cut or opening (see slit, New Oxford American Dictionary). The broadest reasonable interpretation of a tape having a slit does not require an opening. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a tape having a slit is a tape having a long, narrow cut; and the cut may be formed along an entire side and would not form an opening. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1–8, 11, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Brown (US 4,098,966 A). Regarding claim 1, Brown discloses an electrode assembly, comprising: a plurality of tabs (28) stacked to each other (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), at least one of the plurality of tabs (28) comprising a tab body and a free end (32) connected to the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), the free end (32) being formed into a bent portion (32) through at least a single bending (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), and the bent portion (32) being stacked at a side of the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 2, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the bent portion (32) comprises a first bent section and a second bent section (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), the first bent section being stacked at the side of the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), and the second bent section being stacked at a side of the first bent section away from the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 3, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the first bent section is a bent section formed through a single bending of the free end of the at least one tab (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), wherein after the first bent section is further bent inwards, the first bent section is sandwiched between the tab body and the bent free end (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), and the second bent section is an outermost bent section (FIG. 3, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 4, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the plurality of tabs (28) comprises a tab (28) with the bent portion (32) and a plurality of tabs without the bent portion (FIG. 3, C2/L46–C3/L21), wherein the tab (28) with the bent portion (32) is arranged between the plurality of tabs (28) without the bent portion; or the tab (28) with the bent portion (32) is arranged at a side of the plurality of tabs (28) without the bent portion (FIG. 3, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 5, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the plurality of tabs (28) comprises a plurality of positive tabs (28') and a plurality of negative tabs (28", C2/L46–C3/L21), a quantity of the plurality of positive tabs (28') being identical to a quantity of the plurality of negative tabs (28", C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 6, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein a quantity of tabs (28) with the bent portions (32) in the plurality of positive tabs (28') is identical to a quantity of tabs (28) with the bent portions (32), in the plurality of negative tabs (28", C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 7, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the at least one tab (28) is a first tab (28') or a second tab (28"), the first tab (28') and the second tab (28") having opposite polarities (FIG. 1, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 8, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the bent portion (32) has a rectangular shape or a trapezoidal shape (FIG. 4, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 11, Brown discloses a traction battery, comprising at least one electrode assembly (FIG. 1, C2/L28–45), the at least one electrode assembly comprises: a plurality of tabs (28) stacked to each other (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), at least one of the plurality of tabs (28) comprising a tab body and a free end (32) connected to the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), the free end (32) being formed into a bent portion (32) through at least a single bending (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21), and the bent portion (32) being stacked at a side of the tab body (FIG. 2, C2/L46–C3/L21). Regarding claim 12, Brown discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a traction battery, further comprising: an adapting member (6) connected to the plurality of tabs (28) of the electrode assembly through welding (FIG. 4, C2/L46–C3/L21), wherein the bent portion (32) of the at least one tab (28) is located at a side of the tab body away from the adapting member (6, C2/L46–C3/L21), wherein a weld spot at a connection (34) between the adapting member (6) and the at least one tab (28) is located at the bent portion (32, C2/L46–C3/L21). Claims 1 and 9–14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US 2021/0083256 A1, hereinafter Liu). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses an electrode assembly (10, [0048]), comprising: a plurality of tabs (20) stacked to each other (FIG. 4, [0094]), at least one of the plurality of tabs (20) comprising a tab body (201) and a free end (202) connected to the tab body (201, [0054]), the free end (202) being formed into a bent portion (201) through at least a single bending (FIG. 5, [0054]), and the bent portion (201) being stacked at a side of the tab body (201, [0054]). Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly, further comprising: a protection sheet (70) sandwiched between two adjacent ones of the plurality of tabs (20) and/or located at a side of the bent portion (201) away from the tab body (201, [0094]). Regarding claim 10, Liu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses an electrode assembly: wherein the protection sheet (70) covers the bent portion (201, [0094]). Regarding claim 11, Liu discloses a traction battery (100), comprising at least one electrode assembly (10, [0048]), the at least one electrode assembly comprises: a plurality of tabs (20) stacked to each other (FIG. 4, [0094]), at least one of the plurality of tabs (20) comprising a tab body (201) and a free end (202) connected to the tab body (201, [0054]), the free end (202) being formed into a bent portion (201) through at least a single bending (FIG. 5, [0054]), and the bent portion (201) being stacked at a side of the tab body (201, [0054]). Regarding claim 12, Liu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a traction battery, further comprising: an adapting member (40) connected to the plurality of tabs (20) of the electrode assembly through welding (FIG. 5, [0096]), wherein the bent portion (201) of the at least one tab (20) is located at a side of the tab body away from the adapting member (40, [0049]), wherein a weld spot (71) at a connection between the adapting member (40) and the at least one tab (20) is located at the bent portion (201, [0096]). Regarding claim 13, Liu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a traction battery, further comprising: a tape (60) adhering to a surface of a weld spot (71) formed through the welding (FIG. 3, [0076]). Regarding claim 14, Liu discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and further discloses a traction battery: wherein the tape (60) has a slit corresponding to the weld spot (FIG. 3, [0097]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Sean P Cullen, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1251. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 6:00 am to 4:00 pm CT, Friday 6:00 am to 12:00 pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia A Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Sean P Cullen, Ph.D./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706323
LITHIUM-ION SOLID STATE CONDUCTOR, ELECTRODE AND BATTERY INCLUDING THE CONDUCTOR, METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706350
COMPOSITE SEPARATOR, LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE COMPOSITE SEPARATOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695164
TRACTION BATTERY PACK TAB TERMINAL SECURING SYSTEM AND SECURING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683243
SEPARATOR FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES WITH IMPROVED ADHESIVE FORCE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12646799
BATTERY SEPARATOR INCLUDING ZEOLITE COATING POSITIONED WITHIN INTER-PARTICLE PORES OF SUBSTRATE, LITHIUM-ION BATTERY, AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+28.2%)
3y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1246 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month