Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/419,098

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 24, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0039112 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, LONG
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1520 granted / 1660 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1690
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1660 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-9 and 12-29 in the reply filed on 5/7/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 5, it is unclear how a top surface of the second active regions is coplanar with a top surface of the first active regions if the second active regions are on the first active regions as recited in present claim 1, thus claim is indefinite. In claim 14, it is unclear how a top surface of the second active regions is coplanar with a top surface of the first active regions if the second active regions are on the first active regions as recited in present claim 9, thus claim is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yu et al. (US pub 20230066649). With respect to claim 1, Yu et al. teach a semiconductor memory device comprising (see figs. 1-8, particularly fig. 4 and associated text): a substrate having a memory cell region (areas where 208 and 216 are located) and a dummy cell region (areas not 208 and 216) surrounding the memory cell region, wherein a plurality of memory cells 208, 216 are arranged in the memory cell region; a plurality of first active regions 216 each having a bar shape in the memory cell region, the plurality of first active regions separated from each other by a first gap in a first direction (x) and extending in a second direction (y) perpendicular to the first direction; and a plurality of second active regions 208 on the plurality of first active regions, the plurality of second active regions each having a circular shape and separated from each other by a second gap (spacing between 208 in y direction) in the second direction (y). With respect to claim 2, Yu et al. teach a diameter of the circular shape is less than a width of the second gap. See fig. 4 and associated text. With respect to claim 3, Yu et al. teach a diameter of the circular shape is greater than a width of each of the plurality of first active regions. See fig. 4 and associated text. Claim(s) 9 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yu et al. (US pub 20230066649). With respect to claim 9, Yu et al. teach a semiconductor memory device comprising (see figs. 1-8, particularly fig. 4 and associated text): a substrate having a memory cell region (areas where 208 and 216 are located) and a dummy cell region (areas not 208 and 216) surrounding the memory cell region, wherein a plurality of memory cells 208, 216 are arranged in the memory cell region; a plurality of first active regions 216 each having a bar shape in the memory cell region, the plurality of first active regions separated from each other by a first gap in a first direction (x) and extending in a second direction (y) perpendicular to the first direction; and a plurality of second active regions 208 on the plurality of first active regions, the plurality of second active regions each including a curve and separated from each other by a second gap in the second direction (y). With respect to claim 13, Yu et al. teach when a greatest width of a shape of each of the plurality of second active regions is defined as a width of each of the plurality of second active regions, the width of each of the plurality of second active regions is greater than a width of each of the plurality of first active regions. See fig. 4 and associated text. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 6-8, 12, and 15-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 5 and 14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 17-20 are allowed. Examiner’s Cited References The cited references generally show the similar or related structure a dummy cell region surrounding a memory cell region, the cell region having spaced apart first active regions having bar shape and over spaced apart second active regions having circular shape as presently claimed by applicant. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1714. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469-295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LONG . PHAM Examiner Art Unit 2823 /LONG PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707635
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12708012
PACKAGE STRUCTURE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702008
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12702065
CHIP PACKAGE INTEGRATION WITH HYBRID BONDED BRIDGE DIE
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701805
PIXEL ISOLATION ELEMENTS, DEVICES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month