Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/419,654

FLUID CONNECTION ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Priority
Jan 24, 2023 — provisional 63/481,211
Examiner
KEE, FANNIE C
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Oetiker Ny Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
540 granted / 773 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
798
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-4, 6, 8 and 10-23 are pending. Examiner acknowledges Applicant’s amendments to claims 1-3, 16, 17, 19 and 20, canceled claims 5, 7, and 9 and new claims 21-23. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8 and 10-23 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13-16 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cunningham U.S. Patent No. 4,781,400. With regard to claim 1, Cunningham discloses a fluid connection assembly, comprising: a connector body (at 10), including: a first end (end near 30); a second end (end near 43); a first through-bore (bore thru 10); a first radially outward facing surface (outward facing surface of 10) including a groove (at 40, column 3, lines 29-30); and a first radially inward facing surface (at 32); and a retainer (at 15), including: a plate (at 70) including a second through-bore (bore thru 15) and an annular recess circumscribing the second through-bore (see below); at least one arm (at 71), each arm of the at least one arm including a proximal end (end next to 70) connected to the plate and a distal end (end near 73); and a projection (at 72) connected to the at least one arm at the distal end, the projection operatively arranged to engage the groove to connect the retainer to the connector body (as shown in Fig 1). PNG media_image1.png 286 332 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 6, Cunningham discloses wherein the at least one arm comprises: a first arm (at 71); and a second arm (at 71) arranged diametrically opposed to the first arm relative to the plate (see below). PNG media_image2.png 256 338 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to claim 8, Cunningham discloses wherein: the connector body (at 10) further comprises a protrusion (see below) extending radially inward from the first radially inward facing surface; the protrusion forms a first surface (see below) and a second surface (see below); and the first surface is an axially facing surface arranged perpendicular to the first radially inward facing surface (as shown below). PNG media_image3.png 318 372 media_image3.png Greyscale With regard to claim 10, Cunningham discloses further comprising a tube (at 12) including a shoulder (at 12a), wherein the plate is operatively arranged to engage the shoulder to secure the tube to the connector body (where the plate engages the shoulder operatively through the arm 71). With regard to claim 11, Cunningham discloses wherein the tube (at 16) comprises a flared section (section at 21c which flares to form the shoulder) forming the shoulder (at 12a), the flared section arranged completely within the first through-bore when the tube is secured to the connector body (as shown in Fig 1). With regard to claim 13, Cunningham discloses wherein the at least one arm (at 71) further comprises an indentation extending axially from the distal end (see below). PNG media_image4.png 318 372 media_image4.png Greyscale With regard to claim 14, Cunningham discloses wherein the at least one arm comprises: a first arm (at 71); a second arm (at 71) arranged diametrically opposed to the first arm relative to the plate; a third arm (at 71); and a fourth arm (at 71) arranged diametrically opposed to the third arm relative to the plate (see below). PNG media_image5.png 256 338 media_image5.png Greyscale With regard to claim 15, Cunningham discloses wherein the first end (end near 30) is arranged to be sealingly secured to a service valve body (wherein the first end is capable of being arranged to be secured to a service valve body via 35). Note: the service valve body is not a part of the claimed invention. With regard to claim 16, Cunningham discloses a fluid connection assembly, comprising: a connector body (at 10), including: a first end (end near 30); a second end (end near 43); a first through-bore (bore thru 10); a first radially outward facing surface (outward facing surface of 10) including a groove (at 40, column 3, lines 29-30); a first radially inward facing surface (at 32); and a protrusion (see below) extending radially inward from the first radially inward facing surface; a tube (at 12) including a shoulder (at 12a) operatively arranged to be inserted into the first through-bore (as shown in Fig 1); and a retainer (at 15), including: a plate (at 70) including a second through-bore (bore thru 15), the plate operatively arranged to engage the shoulder to secured secure the tube in the connector body (where the plate engages the shoulder operatively through the arm 71); a plurality of arms (at 71, 71), each arm of the plurality of arms being planar and including a proximal end (end next to 70) connected to the plate and a distal end (end near 73); and a projection (at 72) connected to at least one arm (at 71) of the plurality of arms at the distal end, the projection operatively arranged to engage the groove to connect the retainer to the connector body (as shown in Fig 1). PNG media_image6.png 318 372 media_image6.png Greyscale With regard to claim 19, Cunningham discloses wherein the plate (at 70) comprises a continuous recess circumscribing the second through-bore (see below). PNG media_image7.png 286 332 media_image7.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 17, 20, 22 and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kujawski, Jr. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0063656 A1. With regard to claim 2, Cunningham discloses wherein the at least one arm further comprises: a second radially inward facing surface (see below) operatively arranged to engage the first radially outward facing surface (outward facing surface of 10); and a second radially outward facing surface (see below). However, Cunningham does not disclose a rib extending radially from at least one of the second radially inward facing surface and the second radially outward facing surface, the rib arranged axially between and spaced apart from the proximal end and the distal end. Kujawski, Jr. teaches that a rib can be added to an arm to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm (paragraph 81, lines 4-9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a rib extending radially from at least one of the second radially inward facing surface and the second radially outward facing surface with a reasonable expectation of success to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm as taught by Kujawaki, Jr. and to have the rib arranged axially between and spaced apart from the proximal end and the distal end as locating the rib on the arm may be determined through the use of routine experimentation during the engineering design process to optimize the functionality of the device, suited to the intended use and desired parameters. PNG media_image8.png 258 338 media_image8.png Greyscale With regard to claim 17, Cunningham discloses wherein the at least one arm of the plurality of arms further comprises: a second radially inward facing surface (see above) operatively arranged to engage the first radially outward facing surface (outward facing surface of 10); and a second radially outward facing surface (see above). a rib extending radially from at least one of the second radially inward facing surface and the second radially outward facing surface. However, Cunningham does not disclose a rib extending radially from at least one of the second radially inward facing surface and the second radially outward facing surface. Kujawski, Jr. teaches that a rib can be added to an arm to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm (paragraph 81, lines 4-9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a rib extending radially from at least one of the second radially inward facing surface and the second radially outward facing surface with a reasonable expectation of success to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm as taught by Kujawaki, Jr. With regard to claim 20, and as shown in Figure 2, Cunningham discloses a retainer (at 15) for a fluid connection assembly, comprising: a plate (at 70) including a through-bore (bore thru 15); a first planar arm (at 71) connected to and extending from the plate; a second planar arm (at 71) connected to and extending from the plate, the second arm arranged diametrically opposed to the first arm relative to the plate (as shown below); and a projection (at 72) connected to and extending radially inward from at least one of the first arm and the second arm. However, Cunningham does not disclose a rib extending radially from at least one of the first arm and the second arm. Kujawski, Jr. teaches that a rib can be added to an arm to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm (paragraph 81, lines 4-9). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a rib extending radially from at least one of the first and second arm with a reasonable expectation of success to provide structural support while still allowing flexure of the arm as taught by Kujawaki, Jr. PNG media_image2.png 256 338 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to claim 22, Cunningham discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the rib is arranged axially between and spaced apart from the proximal end and the distal end. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the rib arranged axially between and spaced apart from the proximal end and the distal end with a reasonable expectation of success as locating the rib on the arm may be determined through the use of routine experimentation during the engineering design process to optimize the functionality of the device, suited to the intended use and desired parameters. With regard to claim 23, Cunningham discloses wherein the plate further comprises a continuous annular recess circumscribing the through-bore (see below). PNG media_image9.png 286 332 media_image9.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3, 4, 12, 18 and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment to at least claim 1 necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FANNIE KEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1820. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /F.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3679 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624783
CONNECTOR AND CONNECTING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12601439
FITTING WITH RING NUT FOR FIXING A BRANCH PIPE OF AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601429
Wear Ring
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601432
FLOATING CONNECTOR FOR LIQUID COOLING DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595865
Coupling and Circumferential Groove Shape
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.5%)
3y 4m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month