Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/422,365

BATTERY SENSING UNIT AND BATTERY MODULE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Jan 25, 2024
Examiner
MILLER, DANIEL R
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK On Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
669 granted / 812 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
843
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 812 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-6 and 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is directed to a battery sensing unit and, as best understood by the examiner in light of the disclosure, has a scope that includes a battery sensing unit in planar form, e.g., a sheet-shaped flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) such as shown and described in connection with Fig. 5. For example, the battery sensing unit 400 of Fig. 5 (duplicated below) is characterized by a planar geometry and includes a sensing body 410 including a first end and a second end that oppose each other and extending from the first end to the second end in a transverse direction of the battery sensing unit, a first sensing bridge 421 extending forward from the first end of the sensing body 410, a second sensing bridge 422 extending forward from the second end of the sensing body 410, a first sensing connector 431 forming a shape extending from an end of the first sensing bridge 421 toward the second sensing bridge 422, and a second sensing connector 432 forming a shape extending from an end of the second sensing bridge 422 toward the first sensing bridge 421, with the first sensing connector 431 being positioned between the sensing body 410 and the second sensing connector 432. Fig. 5 also shows a fold line FL on each of the first and second sensing bridges 421, 422. PNG media_image1.png 482 520 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2 depends from claim 1 and recites “wherein upon folding of each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge, each of the first sensing connector and the second sensing connector forms a shape extending in a longitudinal direction of the battery sensing unit”. The scope of claim 2 is unclear in view of the phrase “wherein upon folding of each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge”. Under a first interpretation, claim 2 might be intended to affirmatively require a folding step(s) to obtain a battery sensing unit such as shown in Fig. 4 (duplicated below) as battery sensing unit 400. PNG media_image2.png 496 482 media_image2.png Greyscale Under the first interpretation the examiner notes that the folding step(s) in claim 2 would appear to remove affirmatively-required structural limitations of claim 1, e.g., “a first sensing connector forming a shape extending from an end of the first sensing bridge toward the second sensing bridge”, “a second sensing connector forming a shape extending from an end of the second sensing bridge toward the first sensing bridge” and “wherein the first sensing connector is positioned between the sensing body and the second sensing connector”, which is contrary to the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(d) (“A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers”). Under a second interpretation, the language “wherein upon folding of each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge” could mean that the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge are foldable (i.e., capable of being folded) into a state in which each of the first sensing connector and the second sensing connector forms a shape extending in a longitudinal direction of the battery sensing unit. If this meaning is intended, clarification of the claim language “wherein upon folding of each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge” is necessary. Under the second interpretation, the examiner points out that prior art meeting the structural requirements of claim 1 and further capable of being folded/bent in a way that would meet the required configuration of claim 2 may read on claim 2 and claims depending from claim 2. Clarification is required so that the scope of claim 2 is clear. For purposes of the present examination, the second interpretation discussed above is applied. Claims 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) by virtue of their dependence from claim 2. Claim 5 recites “wherein in a state in which each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge is bent, the first sensing connector and the second sensing connector face each other”. The scope of claim 5 is unclear in view of the phrase “wherein in a state in which each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge is bent” for reasons analogous to those discussed above in connection with claim 2, i.e., it is unclear whether claim 5 is intended to affirmatively require bending of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge or merely that the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge are capable of being bent such that the recited orientation of the first and second sensing connectors could be obtained. Clarification is required so that the scope of claim 5 is clear. For purposes of the present examination, the latter interpretation (i.e., the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge are capable of being bent such that the recited orientation of the first and second sensing connectors could be obtained) is applied. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) by virtue of its dependence from claim 5. Claim 15 depends from claim 11 and recites “wherein the battery sensing unit further includes a first sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the first sensing connector”. As best understood by the examiner in light of the disclosure, “a first sensing extension” may be, for example, first sensing extension 451 such as shown in Fig. 11 (folded state of battery sensing unit 400) and Fig. 5 (unfolded state of battery sensing unit 400). The examiner notes that the position of the first sensing extension in claim 15 (“positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the first sensing connector”) seems to be reflected in the unfolded state of Fig. 5 in which the first sensing extension (unlabeled in Fig. 5) extends from the first sensing connector 431 and is positioned between the sensing body 410 and the first sensing connector 431. In the folded state of Fig. 11, the examiner notes that first sensing extension 451 does not appear to be positioned between the sensing body 410 and the first sensing connector 431. The examiner raises this as a potential issue for clarification because in claim 11 the battery sensing unit is clearly not in a planar/unfolded state, whereas claim 15, as best understood in light of the disclosure, appears to recite a position of the first sensing extension that is only present when the battery sensing unit in in a planar/unfolded state. Claims 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) by virtue of their dependence from claim 15. Claim 16 depends from claim 11 and recites “wherein the battery sensing unit further includes a second sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the sensing body”. As best understood by the examiner in light of the disclosure, “a second sensing extension” may be, for example, second sensing extension 452 such as shown in Fig. 11 (folded state of battery sensing unit 400) and Fig. 5 (unfolded state of battery sensing unit 400). The examiner notes that the position of the second sensing extension in claim 16 (“positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the sensing body”) seems to be reflected in the unfolded state of Fig. 5 in which the second sensing extension (unlabeled in Fig. 5) extends from the sensing body 410 and is positioned between the sensing body 410 and the first sensing connector 431. In the folded state of Fig. 11, the examiner notes that second sensing extension 452 does not appear to be positioned between the sensing body 410 and the first sensing connector 431. The examiner raises this as a potential issue for clarification because in claim 11 the battery sensing unit is clearly not in a planar/unfolded state, whereas claim 16, as best understood in light of the disclosure, appears to recite a position of the first sensing extension that is only present when the battery sensing unit in in a planar/unfolded state. In claim 17, “the second sensing extension” lacks antecedent basis, rendering the scope of the claim unclear. It appears that claim 17 may have been intended to depend from claim 16 (which would provide the necessary antecedent basis support) instead of claim 15. This dependence is presumed for purposes of the present examination. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) by virtue of its dependence from claim 17. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2023/0261332 to Fukushima et al. (Fukushima). Regarding claim 1, Fukushima discloses a battery sensing unit (relay FPC 150 of Fig. 9 as annotated below) for sensing a status of a battery module, comprising: a sensing body including a first end and a second end that oppose each other and extending from the first end to the second end in a transverse direction of the battery sensing unit (see annotated Fig. 9 below, extension part 54B having first (left) end and second (right) end that oppose each other and extends from the first end to the second end in a transverse direction of the battery sensing unit); a first sensing bridge extending forward from the first end of the sensing body (see annotated Fig. 9 below, intersection part 155A); a second sensing bridge extending forward from the second end of the sensing body (see annotated Fig. 9 below, intersection part 55B); a first sensing connector forming a shape extending from an end of the first sensing bridge toward the second sensing bridge (see annotated Fig. 9 below, extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A); and a second sensing connector forming a shape extending from an end of the second sensing bridge toward the first sensing bridge (see annotated Fig. 9 below, at least extension part 54D in combination with second counterpart connector 51B), wherein the first sensing connector is positioned between the sensing body and the second sensing connector (see annotated Fig. 9 below, noting that first sensing connector (extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A) is positioned between the sensing body (extension part 54B) and the second sensing connector (at least extension part 54D in combination with second counterpart connector 51B)). PNG media_image3.png 596 716 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Fukushima discloses wherein upon folding of each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge, each of the first sensing connector and the second sensing connector forms a shape extending in a longitudinal direction of the battery sensing unit (Fukushima, e.g., Fig. 9, noting bending parts 56A and 56B which are bent/folded to produce the configuration of Fig. 10 in which first sensing connector (extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A) and second sensing connector (at least extension part 54D in combination with second counterpart connector 51B) forms a shape extending in a longitudinal direction of the battery sensing unit). Regarding claim 3, Fukushima discloses wherein the battery sensing unit includes a first face and a second face formed opposite the first face (Fukushima, e.g., Fig. 9, FPC 150 necessarily includes a first face, e.g., bottom face, and a second face, e.g., top face, opposite the first face), and wherein in a state in which each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge is folded, a first portion of the first face corresponding to the sensing body faces upward (Fukushima, e.g., Fig. 10, in folded state a first portion of the first face corresponding to extension part 54B faces upward), and each of a second portion of the first face corresponding to the first sensing connector and a third portion of the first face corresponding to the second sensing connector faces downward (Fukushima, e.g., Fig. 10, in folded state each of a second portion of the first face corresponding to the first sensing connector (extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A) and a third portion of the first face corresponding to the second sensing connector (at least extension part 54D in combination with second counterpart connector 51B) faces downward due to the folds at bending parts 56A and 56B). Regarding claim 4, Fukushima discloses wherein in a state in which each of the first sensing bridge and the second sensing bridge is folded, the sensing body is disposed between the first sensing connector and the second sensing connector (Fukushima, e.g., Fig. 10, noting that sensing body (extension part 54B) is disposed between first sensing connector (extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A) and second sensing connector (at least extension part 54D in combination with second counterpart connector 51B)). Regarding claim 9, Fukushima discloses wherein the sensing body, the first sensing bridge, the second sensing bridge, the first sensing connector, and the second sensing connector are formed as a unibody (Fukushima, e.g., paragraph 84, “In the foregoing embodiments, the FPCs 60 and 160 are divided. However, the present disclosure is not limited to this, and an FPC may be provided as a single body”). Regarding claim 10, Fukushima discloses wherein the sensing body, the first sensing bridge, the second sensing bridge, the first sensing connector, and the second sensing connector includes a flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) (Fukushima, e.g., paragraph 84, “In the foregoing embodiments, the FPCs 60 and 160 are divided. However, the present disclosure is not limited to this, and an FPC may be provided as a single body”; also see Fig. 9 and paragraphs 76-80, with FPC 150 being a flexible printed circuit board). Claims 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2019/0348720 to Oh et al. (Oh). Regarding claim 11, Oh discloses a battery module comprising: a battery cell assembly including a plurality of battery cells arranged in a front-rear direction of the battery cell assembly, each of the plurality of battery cells including a first electrode lead and a second electrode lead that protrude in a first direction and are formed opposite to each other (Oh, e.g., Fig. 11 (annotated below), cell assembly 300 of the battery module 1); a first bus bar unit coupled to the first electrode lead (Oh, e.g., Fig. 11, bus bars 500 on left side of Fig. 11); a second bus bar unit coupled to the second electrode lead (Oh, e.g., Fig. 11, corresponding bus bars 500 on right side of Fig. 11); and a battery sensing unit configured to connect the first bus bar unit and the second bus bar unit and operable to sense a status of the battery cell assembly (Oh, e.g., Fig. 11, flexible circuit board 100; also see paragraph 142, flexible circuit board 100 disposed along the upper plate 410 and the side plates 420 to sense voltages of the battery cells), wherein the battery sensing unit includes: a first sensing connector coupled to the first bus bar unit (Oh, e.g., Figs. 7 (annotated below) and 11, and paragraph 134, third connection circuit portion 150 as shown in annotated Fig. 7 on left side of Fig. 11); a second sensing connector coupled to the second bus bar unit (Oh, e.g., Figs. 7 (duplicated below) and 11, corresponding third connection circuit portion 150 on right side of Fig. 11); a sensing body extending in the first direction (Oh, e.g., Figs. 7 (annotated below) and 11, central portion 110); a first sensing bridge configured to connect a first end of the sensing body to the first sensing connector, the first sensing bridge being folded and bent (Oh, e.g., Figs. 7, 11, first connection circuit portions 120 in combination with second connection circuit portions 130 on left side of Fig. 11; also see Fig. 5 (annotated below), disclosing a fold and a bend); and a second sensing bridge configured to connect a second end of the sensing body to the second sensing connector, the second sensing bridge being folded and bent (Oh, e.g., Figs. 7, 11, corresponding first connection circuit portions 120 in combination with corresponding second connection circuit portions 130 on right side of Fig. 11; also see Fig. 5, disclosing a fold and a bend). PNG media_image4.png 790 684 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 774 691 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, Oh discloses wherein the battery sensing unit includes a flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) (Oh, e.g., paragraph 142, flexible circuit board 100). Regarding claim 13, Oh discloses wherein the sensing body, the first sensing bridge, the second sensing bridge, the first sensing connector, and the second sensing connector are formed as a unibody (Oh, e.g., Fig. 2 and paragraph 117, first connection circuit portions 120, the second connection circuit portions 130 and the overlapped portions 140 may correspond to portions of the flexible circuit board 100 and may be integrally formed with the central portion 110 to constitute one flexible circuit board). Regarding claim 14, Oh discloses wherein the first sensing bridge is bent between a folded portion of the first sensing bridge and the first sensing connector, and wherein the second sensing bridge is bent between a folded portion of the second sensing bridge and the second sensing connector (Oh, e.g., Fig. 5 as annotated above, noting bend between folded portion and first sensing connector; note that this feature will also be present in the second sensing bridge on the right side of Fig. 11). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukushima in view of US 2021/0184379 to Jung et al. (Jung). Regarding claims 7 and 8, Fukushima is not relied upon as explicitly disclosing a first sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the first sensing connector (claim 7) and a second sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the sensing body (claim 8). In related art, Jung discloses in Fig. 4 (see below) an FPCB assembly 10 for use with a battery module in a manner substantially identical to that of Fukushima (compare FPCB assembly 10 of Jung, Fig. 4 with relay FPC 50 of Fukushima, Fig. 1). Jung discloses that the FPCB assembly 10 includes sensing extensions in the form of temperature sensors distributed over its length for sensing temperatures of battery cells (Jung, e.g., Figs. 3-4 and paragraph 42, temperature sensors 25). As shown in the comparison of Fig. 4 of Jung with Fig. 10 of Fukushima reoriented to the view of Jung, Jung’s temperature sensors are distributed over the length of the FPCB assembly 10, with at least two of the sensors generally coinciding with the first sensing connector (extension part 54A in combination with first counterpart connector 51A) and the sensing body (extension part 54B) of Fukushima, respectively. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify Fukushima such that Fukushima’s relay FPC 150 of Fig. 9 includes a first sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the first sensing connector (claim 7) and a second sensing extension positioned between the sensing body and the first sensing connector and extending from the sensing body (claim 8). In this way, when Fukushima’s FPC 150 of Fig. 9 is folded to obtain the FPC 150 of Fig. 10, a first sensing extension in the form of a first temperature sensor on Fukushima’s first sensing connector and a second extension in the form of a second temperature sensor on Fukushima’s sensing body can be obtained in order to obtain the benefit of battery cell temperature sensing disclosed by Jung. PNG media_image6.png 694 683 media_image6.png Greyscale Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Oh. Regarding claim 19, Oh discloses that the flexible circuit board 100 is configured to sense a voltage of a battery cell (Oh, e.g., Fig. 2 and paragraph 113). Oh is not relied upon as explicitly disclosing wherein the battery sensing unit includes a battery sensor that generates a signal indicative of a battery charge status or a battery discharge status of the battery cell assembly. The examiner takes Official notice of the fact that the use of voltage sensors and current sensors in battery modules of the type disclosed by Oh for the purpose of generating a signal indicative of a battery charge status or a battery discharge status was well-known and conventional before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to modify Oh such that Oh’s flexible circuit board 100 includes a battery sensor that generates a signal indicative of a battery charge status or a battery discharge status of the battery cell assembly for at least the reason that this would enable a battery management system (BMS) to manage the charging and discharging of each battery cell in the manner disclosed by Oh in paragraphs 4 and 158, for example. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2013/0078487 to Shin et al. relates to a battery module including a battery cell stack having a plurality of battery cells or unit modules connected in series and/or in parallel to each other in a state in which the battery cells or the unit modules are stacked in the lateral direction, voltage sensing members provided at ends thereof with connection terminals electrically connected to electrode terminal connection parts of the battery cells disposed at the front and rear of the battery cell stack to sense voltages of the battery cells or the unit modules, an upper case provided with mounting parts, in which the voltage sensing members are mounted, and a lower case provided at the front thereof with external input and output terminals; see, e.g., Fig. 9. US 2016/0141712 to Choi et al. relates to a battery module array including battery modules, which may have improved space utilization; see, e.g., Fig. 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL R MILLER whose telephone number is (571) 270-1964. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CATHERINE T RASTOVSKI can be reached on (571) 270-0349. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL R MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2863
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601801
A MAGNETIC SHIELD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12578397
METHOD, APPARATUS, MEDIUM AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING VOLTAGE INFLECTION POINT OF CELL CORE IN LFP BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566226
ELECTRICAL CONNECTION FOR USE IN CRYOGENIC APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566227
SHIM COILS FOR A COMPACT MRI GRADIENT SYSTEM BASED ON MULTILAYER FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND ARRANGEMENT SCHEME OF CONDUCTOR LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560662
MAGNETIC PARTICLE IMAGING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 812 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month