Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/424,688

STACK TYPE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 23, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0142090
Examiner
GRAY, AARON J
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
422 granted / 514 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
547
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II in the reply filed on 05/13/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-8 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/13/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 9-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hu et. Al. (US 20230025541 A1 hereinafter Hu). Regarding claim 9, Hu teaches in Figs. 1A-1C with associated text a stack type semiconductor device comprising: a first semiconductor structure (lowest chip 102) having a first surface (upper surface S2) and a second surface (lower surface S1) opposite to the first surface, the first semiconductor structure including at least one memory component 106 on the first surface [0039] and a logic circuit layer 150 on the second surface (Fig. 1A, [0054]); and a second semiconductor structure (102 over the first semiconductor structure) having a third surface S1 and a fourth surface S2 opposite to the third surface, the second semiconductor structure including a control circuit layer 104 integrated on the third surface to control the at least one memory component (Fig. 1C, [0050]), wherein the first semiconductor structure and the second semiconductor structure are hybrid-bonded to face the at least one memory component and the control circuit layer (Fig. 1C, [0050]). Regarding claim 10, Hu teaches the at least one memory component comprises a plurality of capacitors 106 (Fig. 1C, [0047]), and the control circuit layer comprises a plurality of access transistors configured to selectively transmit data to the plurality of capacitors (Fig. 1C, [0050]). Regarding claim 11, Hu teaches the first semiconductor structure further comprises a first bonding layer (146, 142 and 144) positioned on the at least one memory component and hybrid-bonded to the second semiconductor structure (Fig. 1C, [0051]), and wherein the first bonding layer comprises: a plurality of first bonding pads 142 electrically connected to the at least one memory component (Fig. 1C, [0049]); and a first bonding insulation layer 146 configured to electrically isolate the plurality of first bonding pads from each other (Fig. 1C, [0049]). Regarding claim 12, Hu teaches the second semiconductor structure further comprises a second bonding layer (130 and 126) positioned on the control circuit layer (Fig. 1C, [0046]), and wherein the second bonding layer comprises: a plurality of second bonding pads 126 electrically connected to the control circuit layer and bonded to the plurality of first bonding pads (Fig. 1C, [0051]); and a second bonding insulation layer 130 configured to electrically isolate the plurality of second bonding pads from each other (Fig. 1C, [0046]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hu as applied to claim 9 and further in view of Yokoyama et. Al. (US 20190363129 A1 hereinafter Yokoyama). Regarding claim 13, Hu teaches in Fig. 1 with associated text a the stack type semiconductor device of claim 10. Hu does not specify the logic circuit layer comprises at least one of an arithmetic and logic circuit for calculating data in the at least one memory component, a data pipeline circuit, an interface circuit for receiving and processing an external signal, and at least one analog element. Yokoyama teaches in Fig. 1 with associated text a logic circuit layer 200 similar to that of Hu wherein the logic circuit layer comprises at least one of an arithmetic and logic circuit for calculating data in the at least one memory component, a data pipeline circuit, an interface circuit for receiving and processing an external signal, and at least one analog element (analog circuit [0100]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use at least one of an arithmetic and logic circuit for calculating data in the at least one memory component, a data pipeline circuit, an interface circuit for receiving and processing an external signal, and at least one analog element in the logic circuit of Hu as taught by Yokoyama because according to Yokoyama a logic circuit block and an analog circuit that configure a functional circuit are typically mounted as the other circuits 220 in addition to the peripheral circuit 210 [0100]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON J GRAY whose telephone number is (571)270-7629. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toledo Fernando can be reached on 5712721867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON J GRAY/Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707853
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707869
DISPLAY INCLUDING POLARIZING AND RETARDATION STRUCTURE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707805
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE AND A DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701849
LIGHT EMITTING STRUCTURE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701799
SOLID STATE IMAGING DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month