Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/426,868

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Apr 24, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0053491
Examiner
FAN, SU JYA
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
723 granted / 953 resolved
+7.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1008
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 953 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of species A, fig. 1, claims 1-20, in the reply filed on 6/18/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-9, 15-17 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 10-13, 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kanno, US Publication No. 2021/0066340 A1. Kanno anticipates: 1. A semiconductor device comprising (see figs. 5, 6, 8 and 19): a first substrate (30); a wire portion (D0/C2/D1) on the first substrate; a second substrate (41) on the wire portion; a first gate stacking structure (e.g. lower 45) on the second substrate; a second gate stacking structure (e.g. upper 45) on the first gate stacking structure; and a channel structure (MP) passing through the first gate stacking structure and the second gate stacking structure and connected to the second substrate, wherein the second substrate (41B/41A in fig. 8; 41D/41A in fig. 19) includes a first material layer (41B; 41D) and a second material layer on the first material layer, the first material layer (41B; 41D) includes polysilicon including a first material, the second material layer (41A) includes polysilicon including a second material different from the first material, and an insulation layer (E1) is disposed between the wire layer and the second substrate. See Kanno at para. [0001] – [0144], figs. 1-21. 3. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the first material layer (41Dc) includes polysilicon doped with carbon, and the second material layer (41A) includes n-doped polysilicon, para. [0082], [0109], fig. 19. 10. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the channel structure (MP) includes a channel layer (61), and a gate dielectric layer (62) disposed between the channel layer and the first and second gate stacking structures (45), fig. 5. 11. The semiconductor device of claim 10, further comprising a horizontal conductive layer (41C) disposed on the second substrate, wherein the horizontal conductive layer electrically connects the second substrate (41B/41A in fig. 8; 41D/41A in fig. 19) and the channel layer (41C), figs. 5, 8 and 19. 12. The semiconductor device of claim 11, wherein the channel structure (MP) further includes a core insulation layer (60) surrounded by the channel layer (61), and the gate dielectric layer (62) includes a tunneling layer (63), a charge storage layer (64), and a blocking layer (65) sequentially stacked on the channel layer, fig. 6. Regarding claim 13: Kanno teaches the limitations as applied to claims 1 and 3 above. Kanno further teaches the added limitations: where the wire portion (D0/C2/D1) includes a wire layer (D0, D1) and an insulation layer (E1) covering the wire layer, fig. 5. Regarding claim 18: Kanno teaches the limitations as applied to claim above. Kanno further teaches the added limitations: a controller (2 in fig. 1) electrically connected to the semiconductor device on the main substrate, (see fig. 5) wherein the semiconductor device includes a circuit region (PE) and a cell region (40) disposed in the circuit region. Regarding claim 19: Kanno teaches the limitations as applied to claim 3 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kanno, as applied to claims 1 and 13 above. Regarding claim 2: Kanno teaches all the limitations of claim 1 above but does not expressly teach: wherein the first material layer and the second material layer have different values of etching selectivity. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form “the first material layer (e.g. 41Dc) and the second material layer (41A) have different values of etching selectivity” because they comprise different materials at para. [0082], [0109], fig. 19. Furthermore, Kanno teaches materials for the first material layer and the second material layer that is substantially identical to Applicant’s materials. Therefore, the property of “different values of etching selective” is necessarily present. See MPEP 2112: “Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.” A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990) Regarding claim 14: Kanno teaches the limitations as applied to claim 2 above. Relevant Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Shioda, US 20190067317 A1 (Shioda teaches in fig. 18 a second substrate comprising a first material layer (12) and second material layer (84).) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michele Fan whose telephone number is 571-270-7401. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F from 7:30 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jeff Natalini, can be reached on (571) 272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michele Fan/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818 28 August 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 24, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751165
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733296
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND LIGHT-EMITTING APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727310
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721137
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713990
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 953 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month