Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/428,718

PACKAGE CONDUCTIVE TERMINALS WITH REDUCED PALLADIUM VOLUMES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, TAN N
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
957 granted / 1104 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
76.4%
+36.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1104 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restriction Applicant's election without traverse of Group I, claims 9 - 20 is acknowledged. Claims 1 - 8 withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner, 37 CFR. 1.142(b), as being drawn to non-elected invention. Claim Objections 2. Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 11, line 1, 2, “the top surface of the palladium member is within 2 microns of the top surface of the insulative layer” should be changed to “the top surface of the palladium member is approximately flush with the top surface of the insulative layer within 2 microns” for a clarity. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9, 11, 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537). With regard to claim 9, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) disclose a semiconductor package (fig. 4O), comprising: a semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die) including a circuit (204); a first copper member (306; for example, see paragraph [0034]) coupled to the circuit (204) and having a first maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a first maximal horizontal area); a second copper member (334; for example, see paragraph [0041]) coupled to the first copper member (306), the second copper member (334) having a second maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a second maximal horizontal area) that is smaller than the first maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the first maximal horizontal area); a nickel member (332; for example, see paragraph [0041]) contacting the second copper member (334) and having a third maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a third maximal horizontal area) that is smaller than the first maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the first maximal horizontal area); a conductive member (330) contacting the nickel member (332) and having a fourth maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a fourth maximal horizontal area) that is smaller than the first maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the first maximal horizontal area), the conductive member (330) having a top surface facing away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as the semiconductor die); an insulative layer (insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as an insulative layer) contacting the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as the semiconductor die) and the first copper member (306), the second copper member (334), the nickel member (332), and the conductive member (330), a top surface of the insulative layer (insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as the insulative layer) facing away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die) and approximately flush with the top surface of the conductive member (330); a bond wire (a metallization layer 324 functions as a bond wire in order to provide an electrical connection) coupled to the top surface of the conductive member (330); and a mold compound (a layer 320 functions as a mold compound) covering the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as the semiconductor die), the bond wire (324), the insulative layer (the insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as the insulative layer), and the first copper member (306), the second copper member (334), the nickel member (332), and the conductive member (330). PNG media_image1.png 511 587 media_image1.png Greyscale Yu et al. (2022/0285323) do not clearly disclose the conductive member is a palladium member. However, YU et al. (2023/0395537) disclose the conductive member (34) is a palladium member (for example, see paragraph [0027], fig. 3). PNG media_image2.png 360 894 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al. (2022/0285323)’s device to have the conductive member is a palladium member as taught by YU et al. (2023/0395537) in order to improve the structural strength and electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. With regard to claim 11, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) disclose the top surface of the conductive member (330) is flush with the top surface (the top surface of the region 326) of the insulative layer (304, 308, 310, 326). Therefore, the top surface of the conductive member (330) is coplanar with the top surface of the insulative layer (304, 308, 310, 326) wherein 0 micron is within a range of 0 - 2 microns. With regard to claim 12, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) disclose the fourth maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the fourth maximal horizontal area of the conductive member 330) is greater than the third maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the third maximal horizontal area of the nickel member 322). PNG media_image1.png 511 587 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537) and further in view of SEKIKAWA (20190198453). With regard to claim 10, Yu et al. do not clearly disclose the insulative layer comprises polyimide. However, SEKIKAWA discloses the insulative layer (PI) comprises polyimide (for example, see paragraph [0102], fig. 4). PNG media_image3.png 489 825 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al.’s device to have the insulative layer comprises polyimide as taught by SEKIKAWA in order to minimize the signal interference for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Claims 13, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537) and further in view of Mishra et al. (11450638). With regard to claim 13, Yu et al. do not clearly disclose the third maximal horizontal area is greater than the second maximal horizontal area. However, Mishra et al. disclose the third maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area of the layer 108) is greater than the second maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area of the layer 110)). (for example, see fig. 1A). PNG media_image4.png 572 739 media_image4.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al.’s device to have the third maximal horizontal area is greater than the second maximal horizontal area as taught by Mishra et al. in order to improve a high electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. With regard to claim 16, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) and YU et al. (2023/0395537) do not clearly disclose titanium-tungsten between the first and second copper members. However, Mishra et al. disclose titanium-tungsten (110; for example, see column 3, lines 39 - 41) between the first and second copper members (104, 108). PNG media_image4.png 572 739 media_image4.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al.’s device to have titanium-tungsten between the first and second copper members as taught by Mishra et al. in order to improve a high electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537) and further in view of Tanaka (12183701). With regard to claim 14, Yu et al. do not clearly disclose the nickel member has a thickness of at least 1 micron. However, SEKIKAWA discloses the nickel member (55) has a thickness of about 5 microns (for example, see column 10, lines 12, 13, fig. 4). PNG media_image5.png 662 588 media_image5.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al.’s device to have the nickel member has a thickness of at least 1 micron as taught by SEKIKAWA in order to improve a high electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Claims 17, 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537) and further in view of Mishra et al. (11450638). With regard to claim 17, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) disclose a semiconductor package (fig. 4O), comprising: a semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die) including a circuit (204); a first copper member (306; for example, see paragraph [0034]) coupled to the circuit (204) and having a top surface facing away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die), the first copper member (306) having a first maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a first maximal horizontal area); a nickel member (332; for example, see paragraph [0041]) contacting the second copper member (334; for example, see paragraph [0041]); a conductive member (330) contacting a surface of the nickel member (332) that faces away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die), the conductive member (330) having a second maximal horizontal area (a cross-sectional area functioning as a second maximal horizontal area) that is smaller than the first maximal horizontal area (the cross-sectional area functioning as the first maximal horizontal area); an insulative layer contacting the semiconductor die and the first copper, second copper, nickel, and palladium members an insulative layer (insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as an insulative layer) contacting the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as the semiconductor die) and the first copper member (306), the second copper member (334), the nickel member (332), and the conductive member (330), a top surface of the insulative layer (insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as the insulative layer) facing away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die); and positioned within 2 microns (the top surface of the conductive member 330 is coplanar with the top surface region 326 in the insulative layer 304, 308, 310, 326 wherein 0 micron is within a range of 0 - 2 microns ) of a top surface of the conductive member (330) that faces away from the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as a semiconductor die); a bond wire (a metallization layer 324 functions as a bond wire in order to provide an electrical connection) coupled to the top surface of the conductive member (330); and a mold compound (a layer 320 functions as a mold compound) covering the semiconductor die (layers 302, 204 functions as the semiconductor die), the bond wire (324), the insulative layer (the insulating layers 304, 308, 310, 326 functions as the insulative layer), and the first copper member (306), the second copper member (334), the nickel member (332), and the conductive member (330). PNG media_image1.png 511 587 media_image1.png Greyscale Yu et al. (2022/0285323) do not clearly disclose the conductive member is a palladium member. However, YU et al. (2023/0395537) disclose the conductive member (34) is a palladium member (for example, see paragraph [0027], fig. 3). PNG media_image2.png 360 894 media_image2.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al. (2022/0285323)’s device to have the conductive member is a palladium member as taught by YU et al. (2023/0395537) in order to improve the structural strength and electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Yu et al. do not clearly disclose do not clearly disclose titanium-tungsten contacting the top surface of the first copper member; a second copper member contacting the titanium-tungsten. However, Mishra et al. disclose titanium-tungsten (110; for example, see column 3, lines 39 - 41) contacting the top surface of the first copper member (104); a second copper member (108) contacting the titanium-tungsten (110). (for example, see fig. 1A). PNG media_image4.png 572 739 media_image4.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al.’s device to have titanium-tungsten contacting the top surface of the first copper member; a second copper member contacting the titanium-tungsten as taught by Mishra et al. in order to improve a high electrically conductive efficiency of the pads for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. With regard to claim 18, Yu et al. (2022/0285323) disclose the second copper member (334) has a maximal horizontal area less than that (combined area) of the first copper member (306), the nickel member (332), and the conductive member (330). Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al. (2022/0285323) in view of YU et al. (2023/0395537) and Mishra et al. (11450638) further in view of SEKIKAWA (20190198453). With regard to claim 20, Yu et al. and Mishra et al. do not clearly disclose the insulative layer comprises polyimide. However, SEKIKAWA discloses the insulative layer (PI) comprises polyimide (for example, see paragraph [0102], fig. 4). PNG media_image3.png 489 825 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the Yu et al. and Mishra et al.’s device to have the insulative layer comprises polyimide as taught by SEKIKAWA in order to minimize the signal interference for enhancing a stability operation of the semiconductor device, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 15, 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 15, 19 are allowable over the prior art of record, because none of these references disclose or can be combined to yield the claimed invention such as a minimum horizontal area of the palladium member is at least 1200 microns2 as recited in claims 15, 19. Conclusion 11. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAN N TRAN whose telephone number is (571) 272 - 1923. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached on (571) 272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAN N TRAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677447
THIN FILM TRANSISTOR SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677463
HIGH ELECTRON MOBILITY TRANSISTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660687
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660688
FLEXIBLE LED DISPLAY HAVING AN OPTIC OPTICALLY COUPLED WITH AN LED CHIP
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660438
ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY PANEL
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1104 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month