Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/432,182

METHOD OF FORMING PHOTORESIST PATTERNS AND BAKING EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, HUNG
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
1313 granted / 1449 resolved
+22.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1480
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1449 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I (claims 1-18) in the reply filed on February 10, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang et al (U.S.Pat. 7,845,868 B1). PNG media_image1.png 303 391 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 1, Huang discloses a method of forming a photoresist pattern (107-108) and comprising all features of the instant claim such as: forming a photoresist layer (104) on a substrate (100) ; performing an exposure process on the photoresist (see figures 1a-1b and col.3, lines 19-40); performing a post exposure baking (PEB) process on the photoresist layer with a temperature gradient (202; see col.3 lines 60-65) in the photoresist layer in a vertical direction substantially perpendicular to an upper surface of the substrate (see figure 3B as re-produced above) and performing a development process on the photoresist layer (see col.5, lines 60-65). As to claim 4, it is apparent that a temperature difference between upper and lower surfaces of the photoresist layer is greater than 0°C and up to about 300°C (see col.3, lines 54-63). As to claim 8, prior to performing the exposure process, performing a pre-baking process on the photoresist (see col.1, lines 13-20). As to claim 9, the photoresist layer (104) is a chemical amplified resist (CAR). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al (U.S.Pat. 7,845,868 B1) in view of Cheng et al (U.S.Pat. 8,828,493 B2). With respect to claims 2-3, Huang discloses a method of forming a photoresist pattern and comprising substantially all limitations of the instant claims as discussed above. Huang does not expressly disclose the photoresist layer (104) having photo acid generators (PAGs). This feature is well known in the art. For example, Cheng discloses a photoresist layer on a substrate wherein the photoresist layer has photo acid generator (PAGs) (see col.11, lines 14-17). It would have been obvious to a skilled artisan to apply photo acid generator (PAGs) as suggested by Cheng into the photoresist layer of Huang for at least the purpose of forming a treated layer on the substrate and improving the quality of the substrate as intended by Huang. Claims 5-7 and 10-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al (U.S.Pat. 7,845,868 B1) in view of Rangarajan et al (U.S.Pat. 6,573,480 B1). With respect to claims 5-7, Huang discloses a method of forming a photoresist and comprising substantially all limitations of the instant claims as discussed. Huang does not expressly disclose a heat source over an upper surface of the photoresist layer on the substrate and a heat sink under a lower surface of the photoresist layer on the substrate and the heat sink has a chill plate. These features are well known per se. Rangarajan discloses a system for controlling the temperature of the photoresist of a substrate having a heat source (240) placed over an upper surface of the photoresist layer on the substrate and a heat sink/a chill plate (230) placed under a lower surface of the photoresist layer on the substrate (see figure 2). It would have been obvious to a skilled artisan to incorporate the teachings of Huang and Rangarajan to obtain the claimed invention as specified in claims 5-7 of the present invention. It would have been obvious to employ the system having a heat source, a heat sink/chill plate as suggested by Rangarajan into the baking system of Huang for the purpose of controlling the temperature of the substrate and thereby preventing the substrate from thermal expansion as intended by Huang. As to claim 10, as discussed Huang teaches a photolithography process including forming a photoresist layer on a substrate, exposing the photoresist layer to radiation through a mask, performing a post-exposure bake (PEB) process, and subsequently developing the exposed photoresist layer (see Huang, col.1 and col.4, describing the standard photolithography process including coating a photoresist layer, exposing the photoresist layer, performing post-exposure baking and developing the exposed photoresist layer). Huang further teaches controlling the temperature distribution of the wafer during baking in order to control the critical dimension of the patterned resist features. However, Huang does not explicitly disclose that the substrate is provided into a space between a heat source and a heat sink/cool plate of a baking chamber during the baking process. PNG media_image2.png 402 578 media_image2.png Greyscale Rangarajan teaches a heat system for processing a photoresist layer in which the substrate (220) is positioned between a heat source (240) and a heat sink/cooling plate (230) positioned below the substrate (see figure 2; re-produced above) thereby establishing a temperature gradient through the substrate (see Rangarajan col.5-6). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to configure the baking system of Huang so that the substrate is positioned between a heat source and a heat sink/cooling plate as taught by Rangarajan in order to provide improved control of temperature distribution across the photoresist layer during the baking process, which is known to improve photoresist profile and critical dimension control. As to claims 11-12, as demonstrated, Rangarajan discloses a heating system (figure 2) in which the heat source/lamp heater (240) is located above the substrate (220) and a cooling plate (230) is located below the substrate. As to claim 13, as shown in figure 2, a lower surface of the substrate (220) contacts an upper surface of the chill plate (230). As to claims 14 and 18, Huang teaches that the photoresist used in the photolithography process may be a chemically amplified resist which inherently includes photo acid generators used to generate acid during exposure. As to claim 15, Huang teaches the use of chemically amplified photoresist and the performance of a post-exposure bake process, during which acid generated during exposure diffuses through the resist to induce chemical and amplification reactions. As to claim 16, Huang discloses that during the PEB process a temperature difference between upper and lower surfaces of the photoresist layer is greater than 0°C and up to about 300°C (see col.3, lines 54-63). As to claim 17, Huang teaches that photolithography process typically includes a pre-bake (soft bake) step prior to exposure in order to remove solvent from the photoresist layer. Prior Art Made of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lai (U.S.Pat. 9,354,521) discloses photoresist system and method and has been cited for technical background. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG HENRY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2124. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Minh Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HUNG HENRY NGUYEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2882 Hvn 3/4/26 /HUNG V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 25, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601980
STAGE APPARATUS, EXPOSURE APPARATUS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FLAT PANEL DISPLAY, AND DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601979
MULTI-COLUMN LARGE FIELD OF VIEW IMAGING PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601984
METROLOGY METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591180
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585182
OVERLAY CORRECTION FOR ADVANCED INTEGRATED-CIRCUIT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1449 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month