Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/433,725

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REGULATING POWER USAGE BY A MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM BASED ON THE TIME OF DAY TO SAVE POWER COST

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
KASENGE, CHARLES R
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
GE Precision Healthcare LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1092 granted / 1297 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1330
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1297 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-13 and 15-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Farrell WO 2023/073335 (hereinafter “Farrell”) in view of Abenaim et al. U.S. PGPub 2012/0027161 (hereinafter “Abenaim”). Regarding claims 1, 10 and 19, Farrell discloses a power distribution unit for a medical device (e.g. pg. 22, 1st ¶, “To put…”; Fig. 1 and 6), comprising: a battery system powering a medical device, wherein the battery system is configured to receive electrical power from an electrical grid and to store the electrical power (e.g. pg. 21, last ¶ - pg. 22, 1st ¶, “For appliances”); and a time of day tariff controller (i.e. controller) configured to communicate with a smart meter (i.e. smart meter) to determine both a non-peak period (i.e. lower cost tariff period) of a day and a peak period (i.e. higher cost tariff period) of the day for usage of the electrical power from the electrical grid and related tariff information, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured to regulate utilization of the electrical power from both the electrical grid and the battery system based on a time of the day and the related tariff information (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Regarding claims 1, 10 and 19, Farrell discloses a battery system powering a medical device, but does not explicitly disclose the battery system being integrated within a medical imaging system. Regarding claims 9, 18 and 20, Farrell does not disclose the medical device being a computed tomography imaging system. Abenaim discloses a battery system integrated within a computed tomography imaging system, wherein the imaging system is powered by the grid or the battery system (e.g. ¶29 and 44; Fig. 1 and 6). At the time the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to use Farrell’s method of managing power distribution for a computed tomography imaging system with an integrated battery. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this in order to power the imaging system for the lowest cost. Therefore, it would have been obvious to modify Farrell with Abenaim to obtain the invention as specified in claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15-20. Regarding claims 2 and 11, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 1, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is being utilized during the non-peak period both to cause utilization of the electrical power directly from the electrical grid to power one or more components of the medical imaging system and to cause charging of the battery system (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Regarding claims 3 and 12, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 2, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is being utilized during the non-peak period to cause utilization of the electrical power stored in the battery system to power the one or more components of the medical imaging system to provide peak power shaving during peak power operation of the medical imaging system (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Regarding claims 4 and 13, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 1, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is not being utilized during the non-peak period to cause charging of the battery system (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Regarding claims 6 and 15, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 1, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is not being utilized during the peak period both to cause stopping of charging of the battery system and to cause the electrical power stored in the battery system to be fed back to the electrical grid (e.g. pg. 8, 1st ¶, “Alternatively…”; pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some…”). Regarding claims 7 and 16, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 1, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is being utilized during the peak period both to cause stopping of charging of the battery system and to cause utilization of the electrical power stored in the battery system to power one or more components of the medical imaging system (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Regarding claims 8 and 17, Farrell discloses the power distribution unit of claim 1, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured when the medical imaging system is being utilized during the peak period both to cause utilization of the electrical power stored in the battery system to power one or more components of the medical imaging system and to cause charging of the battery system (e.g. pg. 23, 2nd ¶ - pg. 24, 4th ¶, “In use…”; pg. 27, last ¶ - pg. 28, 3rd ¶, “In some”; Fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Relevant Prior Art Regarding claims 1, 10 and 18, Boss et al. U.S. PGPub 2011/0320828 discloses a power distribution unit for a medical device, comprising: a battery system, wherein the battery system is configured to receive electrical power from an electrical grid and to store the electrical power (e.g. ¶28, 53, 55, 60, 66-67 and 81-89); and a time of day tariff controller (i.e. power allocation control module) configured to determine both a non-peak period of a day and a peak period of the day for usage of the electrical power from the electrical grid and related tariff information, wherein the time of day tariff controller is configured to regulate utilization of the electrical power from both the electrical grid and the battery system based on a time of the day and the related tariff information (e.g. ¶53, 55 and ¶81-89). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES R KASENGE whose telephone number is (571)272-3743. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CK March 6, 2026 /CHARLES R KASENGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638016
Concrete Pump Water Box Level Sensor
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636735
WELD QUALITY INSPECTION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632039
DATA ANALYSIS DEVICE AND METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628310
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FAN SPEED, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12613758
METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DETECTING ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR OF PROCESS EQUIPMENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1297 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month