Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/435,699

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Priority
Feb 17, 2023 — JP 2023-023609
Examiner
SALERNO, SARAH KATE
Art Unit
2814
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
644 granted / 878 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
84.6%
+44.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 878 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A, Figures 4-10 in the reply filed on 5/20/26 is acknowledged. Claims 10-11 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 5/20/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 12, and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jan (US PGPub 2019/0206980). Claim 1: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate (104); an element insulating layer (871), disposed on the substrate; and a semiconductor resistive layer (110), disposed within the element insulating layer, wherein the semiconductor resistive layer extends along a first direction perpendicular to a thickness direction of the substrate and includes an uneven portion along the thickness direction. Claim 2: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) the uneven portion is multiply disposed and spaced apart from each other along the first direction. Claim 3: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) the plurality of uneven portions are disposed in the same pitch along the first direction. Claim 4: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) the uneven portion includes: a first resistive portion, extending along the first direction; a second resistive portion, located at a position shifted from the first resistive portion along the first direction and closer to the substrate than the first resistive portion, wherein the second resistive portion extends along the first direction; and a connecting portion, extending along a direction intersecting the first direction and connecting an end of the first resistive portion along the first direction to an end of the second resistive portion along the first direction. Claim 5: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a length of the second resistive portion is less than a length of the first resistive portion. Claim 6: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a length of the connecting portion is greater than a thickness of the first resistive portion. Claim 7: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a length of the connecting portion is greater than a length of the second resistive portion. Claim 8: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a direction perpendicular to both the first direction and the thickness direction is set as a second direction, and the connecting portion extends obliquely with respect to the thickness direction when viewed from the second direction. Claim 12: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) [0035-0041] a wiring layer, electrically connected to the semiconductor resistive layer; and a connecting wiring, connecting the semiconductor resistive layer to the wiring layer, wherein the semiconductor resistive layer is disposed at a position different from a position of the uneven portion along the first direction, and includes a resistive end portion to which the connection wiring is connected. Claim 15: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a semiconductor module, comprising: the semiconductor device of Claim 1; a support member, supporting the semiconductor device; and a sealing resin, sealing the semiconductor device and the support member. Sealing resins and support modules (interposers PCBs etc.) are common components in semiconductor modules. Claim 16: Jan teaches (Fig. 6, 8A-8B) a semiconductor module, comprising: the semiconductor device of Claim 2; a support member, supporting the semiconductor device; and a sealing resin, sealing the semiconductor device and the support member. Sealing resins and support modules (interposers PCBs etc.) are common components in semiconductor modules. Claims 9, and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious by Jan (US PGPub 2019/0206980), as applied to claim 1 above and further in view of Tanaka et al. (US PGPub 2024/0339490/ PCT/JP2022/ 041560) Regarding claim 9, as described above, Jan substantially reads on the invention as claimed, and Jan teaches a wiring layer electrically connected to the semiconductor resistive layer. Jan does not teach the wiring layer is disposed closer to the substrate than the semiconductor resistive layer along the thickness direction. Tanaka teaches the wiring layer is disposed closer to the substrate than the semiconductor resistive layer along the thickness direction to connect the resistors to each other within the device [0173] Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the device taught by Jan to have had the wiring layers between the resistor and substrate to connect the resistors to other as taught by Tanaka [0173] Claim 13: Tanaka teaches the semiconductor resistive layer is multiply disposed, a direction perpendicular to both the first direction and the thickness direction is set as a second direction, and the plurality of semiconductor resistive layers are spaced apart along the second direction[0173]. Multiple instances of the same device within a semiconductor chip is common. Claim 14: Tanaka teaches the element insulating layer (22) includes: a substrate-side insulating layer (31), disposed on the substrate (21); and a front-side insulating layer, laminated on the substrate-side insulating layer, wherein the substrate-side insulating layer (31) is formed by a plurality of first insulating films (31A) and a plurality of second insulating films (31B) alternately stacked with each other, the second insulating films are configured for relieving stress [0171] of the plurality of first insulating films, and the semiconductor resistive layer is embedded in the surface-side insulating layer. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SARAH KATE SALERNO whose telephone number is (571)270-1266. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30am-2:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wael Fahmy can be reached at 5712721705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SARAH K SALERNO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2814
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677417
THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) MEMORY DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672281
Memory Arrays Comprising Strings Of Memory Cells And Methods Used In Forming A Memory Array Comprising Strings Of Memory Cells
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666777
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE HAVING PLURALITY OF LIGHT EMITTING CELLS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660717
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12635190
FinFET Device and Method of Forming Same
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 11m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 878 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month