Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/440,992

FOOD ASSESSMENT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Feb 14, 2024
Examiner
DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN
Art Unit
2666
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hcl Technologies Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
504 granted / 653 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
685
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 653 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. IT is noted that claims 1-20 are considered eligible subject matter. The claims do not describe an abstract idea, but even if they did, they rely on a particular machine/ configuration of sensors incorporated into a lid with a turntable plate. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 9/1/2025 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. The lined through reference has not been considered. Claim Objections Claims 10 and 19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 10 and 19 (and some of the recitations in the specification) recite the limitation “lightning panel”, where the examiner believes the applicant intends to claim “lighting panel”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 6, 8, 10 and 16-19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4 and 16 lists items in a report, but lacks a conjunction between the listed items. Therefore, it is unclear if the applicant intends that all the items are comprised in the report, or some of the items. Please provide a conjunction between the listed items. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the data" in line 2. It appears if the applicant is referring to “data” claimed in claim 5 (which claim 6 does not rely on), but also previously claims “video data” and “image data” in claim 1. Therefore, it is unclear as to which data the applicant is referring to. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the nutritional content" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the at least one weight sensor" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the display screen" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the report" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the user device" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the power button" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the set of buttons" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the controller" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 16 and 17 recite the limitation "the nutritional content" in lines 2 and 2-3, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the at least one weight sensor" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the display screen" in lines3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the report" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the user device" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the power button" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 18 recites the limitation "the set of buttons" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 19 recites the limitation "the controller" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 9, 11-15 and 20 are allowed. Claims 4, 6, 8, 10, 16-19 would be allowed if the above rejections are overcome. Claim 1 contains allowable subject matter regarding the claimed food assessment device comprising both of a turn table plate which is rotational and accommodates a food item, and a lid enclosing the turntable plate, wherein the surface of the lid comprises all three of the claimed AI enabled camera to capture video or image data of the food item for identifying the food item, the claimed set of NIRED sensors for determining chemical composition of the food item, and The claimed LIDAR sensor for determining volume of the food item, wherein each of the camera and sensors scan the food item until the turntable plate completes a rotation. Claim 11 contains allowable subject matter regarding the claimed method with the claimed food assessment device with the claimed rotational turn table plate that is enclosed with the claimed lid, the method comprising receiving a user input for assessing the food item placed on the turntable plate, wherein the lid comprises all three of the claimed AI enabled camera, the claimed set of NIRED sensors, and the claimed LIDAR sensor, starting by the food assessment device, a rotation of the turntable plate accommodating the at least one food item in a predefined direction, wherein the turntable plate rotates for a predefined time, and simultaneously scanning by the food assessment device, the at least one food item until the turntable late completes the rotation, the scanning comprising the claimed capturing of the video or image data to identify the at least one food item through the AI enabled camera, determining a chemical composition by the set of NIRED sensors, and determining volume of the food item by the LIDAR sensor. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHLEEN YUAN DULANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-2902. The examiner can normally be reached M1:9am-5pm, th1:9am-1pm, fri1 9am-3pm, m2: 9am-5pm, t2:9-5 th2:9am-5pm, f2: 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emily Terrell can be reached at 5712703717. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHLEEN Y DULANEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2666 12/15/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602801
IMAGE PROCESSING CIRCUITRY AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD FOR DEPTH ESTIMATION IN A TIME-OF-FLIGHT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602930
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTINUOUSLY TRACKING HUMANS IN AN AREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593019
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS USING PARALLAX IN IMAGES CAPTURED FROM A PLURALITY OF DIRECTIONS, METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586242
Method, System, And Computer Program For Recognizing Position And Attitude Of Object Imaged By Camera
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586165
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RECONSTRUCTING IMAGE USING MOTION DEBLURRING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 653 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month