Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

HCL Technologies Limited

20 pending office actions • 17 art units • 20 examiners • 0 of 20 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 30 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

20
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (40%)
10
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (15%)
§101 + other1 (5%)
§103 only9 (45%)
§102 only1 (5%)
§112 only2 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
40% of docket
2
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
35% of docket
3
Business / Other
15% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

200 h
Manual time on pending OAs
40 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
70 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUSSEIN, HASSAN A 1 58.7% +53.0%
REN, ZHUBING 1 71.6% +42.3%
GRUBY, RANDALL A 1 62.5% +43.6%
ESONU, VICTOR CHIGOZIRIM 1 16.7% +0.0%
MORRISON, JAY A 1 81.0% +23.9%
SHIMELES, BEZAWIT NOLAWI 1 100.0% +0.0%
UNG, LANNY N 1 71.2% +25.7%
DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 1 77.1% +24.0%
MELARAGNO, MICHAEL 1 67.3% +11.6%
LUU, CUONG V 1 71.7% +36.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18633589 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING APPLICATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SHIMELES, BEZAWIT NOLAWI 5d overdue

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18663168 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING CANDIDATES THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODELS ESONU, VICTOR CHIGOZIRIM 4d overdue
18422044 PORTABLE BEVERAGE DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF MELARAGNO, MICHAEL 21d
19006474 LIQUID DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF GRUBY, RANDALL A
18640028 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODEL MORRISON, JAY A
18396758 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF AN EXISTING APPLICATION LUU, CUONG V
18544526 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF OPTIMIZING DEPLOYMENT OF RESOURCES ON CLOUD PROVIDERS LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE
18536742 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TEST SCRIPT GENERATION AND EXECUTION LIN, KATHERINE Y
18097342 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVELY CREATING, EXECUTING, AND MANAGING DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE (DFX) RULES HOCKER, JOHN PAUL

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18440992 FOOD ASSESSMENT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 14d
18422044 PORTABLE BEVERAGE DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF MELARAGNO, MICHAEL 21d
18609499 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VISUALLY INSPECTING COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY CODE UNG, LANNY N 27d
19077233 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING INDIRECT VISUALIZATION ACCESS OF A DATA-LAKE HUSSEIN, HASSAN A
19037135 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING TRAINING DATA FOR FINE-TUNING OF MACHINE LEARNING MODEL REN, ZHUBING
19006474 LIQUID DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF GRUBY, RANDALL A
18640028 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODEL MORRISON, JAY A
18396758 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF AN EXISTING APPLICATION LUU, CUONG V

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 1
2151 1
2673 1
2197 1
2666 1
3754 1
2192 1
3631 1
2195 1
2113 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19077233 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING INDIRECT VISUALIZATION ACCESS OF A DATA-LAKE HUSSEIN, HASSAN A §103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 12, 2025
19037135 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING TRAINING DATA FOR FINE-TUNING OF MACHINE LEARNING MODEL REN, ZHUBING §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 25, 2025
19006474 LIQUID DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF GRUBY, RANDALL A §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 31, 2024
18663168 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING CANDIDATES THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODELS ESONU, VICTOR CHIGOZIRIM 3629 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending May 14, 2024
18640028 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODEL MORRISON, JAY A 2151 §101 Final Rejection Pending Apr 19, 2024
18633589 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING APPLICATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SHIMELES, BEZAWIT NOLAWI 2673 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Apr 12, 2024
18609499 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VISUALLY INSPECTING COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY CODE UNG, LANNY N 2197 §112 Final Rejection 27d Pending Mar 19, 2024
18440992 FOOD ASSESSMENT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF DULANEY, KATHLEEN YUAN 2666 §112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Feb 14, 2024
18422044 PORTABLE BEVERAGE DISPENSING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOF MELARAGNO, MICHAEL 3754 §102§103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Jan 25, 2024
18396758 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF AN EXISTING APPLICATION LUU, CUONG V 2192 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 27, 2023
18393722 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COLLECTING OBJECTS HAWN, PATRICK D 3631 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 22, 2023
18544526 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF OPTIMIZING DEPLOYMENT OF RESOURCES ON CLOUD PROVIDERS LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE 2195 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 19, 2023
18536742 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TEST SCRIPT GENERATION AND EXECUTION LIN, KATHERINE Y 2113 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 12, 2023
18510715 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING APPROACH AND SCOPE OF HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION FOR MEDICAL DEVICES LEGGETT, ANDREA C. 2171 §102 Final Rejection Pending Nov 16, 2023
18385019 DEVICE AND METHOD TO REMOVE OBSTRUCTION FROM THROAT OF A USER DANG, ANH TIEU 3771 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 30, 2023
18384399 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INDOOR NAVIGATION PALMARCHUK, BRIAN KEITH 3669 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 27, 2023
18243686 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTOXICATION EXAMINATION OF OPERATORS FOR ASSET OPERATION AUTHORIZATION HERRERA, MICHAEL J 3668 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 08, 2023
18097342 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVELY CREATING, EXECUTING, AND MANAGING DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE (DFX) RULES HOCKER, JOHN PAUL 2188 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 16, 2023
17524764 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTING AND CLASSIFYING MANUFACTURING FEATURES FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF PRODUCT BENOURAIDA, AMINA MORENO 2129 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Nov 12, 2021
17202926 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPERS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BOLEN, NICHOLAS D 3624 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 16, 2021

Managing HCL Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month